Cargando…

Understanding the use of artificial intelligence for implant analysis in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms aimed at reviewing radiographs after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This disruptive technology is particularly promising in the context of preoperative planning for rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Aakash K., Lavu, Monish S., Hecht, Christian J., Burkhart, Robert J., Kamath, Atul F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37919812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00209-z
_version_ 1785130806768828416
author Shah, Aakash K.
Lavu, Monish S.
Hecht, Christian J.
Burkhart, Robert J.
Kamath, Atul F.
author_facet Shah, Aakash K.
Lavu, Monish S.
Hecht, Christian J.
Burkhart, Robert J.
Kamath, Atul F.
author_sort Shah, Aakash K.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms aimed at reviewing radiographs after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This disruptive technology is particularly promising in the context of preoperative planning for revision TJA. Yet, the efficacy of AI algorithms regarding TJA implant analysis has not been examined comprehensively. METHODS: PubMed, EBSCO, and Google Scholar electronic databases were utilized to identify all studies evaluating AI algorithms related to TJA implant analysis between 1 January 2000, and 27 February 2023 (PROSPERO study protocol registration: CRD42023403497). The mean methodological index for non-randomized studies score was 20.4 ± 0.6. We reported the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) for the performance of each outcome measure. RESULTS: Our initial search yielded 374 articles, and a total of 20 studies with three main use cases were included. Sixteen studies analyzed implant identification, two addressed implant failure, and two addressed implant measurements. Each use case had a median AUC and accuracy above 0.90 and 90%, respectively, indicative of a well-performing AI algorithm. Most studies failed to include explainability methods and conduct external validity testing. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the promising role of AI in recognizing implants in TJA. Preliminary studies have shown strong performance in implant identification, implant failure, and accurately measuring implant dimensions. Future research should follow a standardized guideline to develop and train models and place a strong emphasis on transparency and clarity in reporting results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-023-00209-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10623774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106237742023-11-04 Understanding the use of artificial intelligence for implant analysis in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review Shah, Aakash K. Lavu, Monish S. Hecht, Christian J. Burkhart, Robert J. Kamath, Atul F. Arthroplasty Review INTRODUCTION: In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms aimed at reviewing radiographs after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This disruptive technology is particularly promising in the context of preoperative planning for revision TJA. Yet, the efficacy of AI algorithms regarding TJA implant analysis has not been examined comprehensively. METHODS: PubMed, EBSCO, and Google Scholar electronic databases were utilized to identify all studies evaluating AI algorithms related to TJA implant analysis between 1 January 2000, and 27 February 2023 (PROSPERO study protocol registration: CRD42023403497). The mean methodological index for non-randomized studies score was 20.4 ± 0.6. We reported the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) for the performance of each outcome measure. RESULTS: Our initial search yielded 374 articles, and a total of 20 studies with three main use cases were included. Sixteen studies analyzed implant identification, two addressed implant failure, and two addressed implant measurements. Each use case had a median AUC and accuracy above 0.90 and 90%, respectively, indicative of a well-performing AI algorithm. Most studies failed to include explainability methods and conduct external validity testing. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the promising role of AI in recognizing implants in TJA. Preliminary studies have shown strong performance in implant identification, implant failure, and accurately measuring implant dimensions. Future research should follow a standardized guideline to develop and train models and place a strong emphasis on transparency and clarity in reporting results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-023-00209-z. BioMed Central 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10623774/ /pubmed/37919812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00209-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Shah, Aakash K.
Lavu, Monish S.
Hecht, Christian J.
Burkhart, Robert J.
Kamath, Atul F.
Understanding the use of artificial intelligence for implant analysis in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review
title Understanding the use of artificial intelligence for implant analysis in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review
title_full Understanding the use of artificial intelligence for implant analysis in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review
title_fullStr Understanding the use of artificial intelligence for implant analysis in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the use of artificial intelligence for implant analysis in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review
title_short Understanding the use of artificial intelligence for implant analysis in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review
title_sort understanding the use of artificial intelligence for implant analysis in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37919812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00209-z
work_keys_str_mv AT shahaakashk understandingtheuseofartificialintelligenceforimplantanalysisintotaljointarthroplastyasystematicreview
AT lavumonishs understandingtheuseofartificialintelligenceforimplantanalysisintotaljointarthroplastyasystematicreview
AT hechtchristianj understandingtheuseofartificialintelligenceforimplantanalysisintotaljointarthroplastyasystematicreview
AT burkhartrobertj understandingtheuseofartificialintelligenceforimplantanalysisintotaljointarthroplastyasystematicreview
AT kamathatulf understandingtheuseofartificialintelligenceforimplantanalysisintotaljointarthroplastyasystematicreview