Cargando…

Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review

Back pain in athletes varies with sport, age, and sex, which can impair athletic performance, thereby contributing to retirement. Studies on back pain in this population use questionnaires to assess components, such as pain intensity and location and factors associated with pain, among others. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azevedo, Vinicius Diniz, Ferreira Silva, Regina Márcia, de Carvalho Borges, Silvia Cristina, Fernades, Michele da Silva Valadão, Miñana-Signes, Vicente, Monfort-Pañego, Manuel, Silva Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E., Noll, Matias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37922315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293333
_version_ 1785130889769910272
author Azevedo, Vinicius Diniz
Ferreira Silva, Regina Márcia
de Carvalho Borges, Silvia Cristina
Fernades, Michele da Silva Valadão
Miñana-Signes, Vicente
Monfort-Pañego, Manuel
Silva Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E.
Noll, Matias
author_facet Azevedo, Vinicius Diniz
Ferreira Silva, Regina Márcia
de Carvalho Borges, Silvia Cristina
Fernades, Michele da Silva Valadão
Miñana-Signes, Vicente
Monfort-Pañego, Manuel
Silva Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E.
Noll, Matias
author_sort Azevedo, Vinicius Diniz
collection PubMed
description Back pain in athletes varies with sport, age, and sex, which can impair athletic performance, thereby contributing to retirement. Studies on back pain in this population use questionnaires to assess components, such as pain intensity and location and factors associated with pain, among others. This study aimed to review validated questionnaires that have assessed back pain in athletes. This systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) by searching the databases Embase, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and Scopus. The articles were selected regardless of language and date of publication. Titles and abstracts were independently selected by two reviewers; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. All the steps were conducted using the software Rayyan. The methodological quality of the questionnaire validation articles was assessed using a critical appraisal tool checklist proposed by Brink and Louw. The search returned 4748 articles, of which 60 were selected for this review, including 5 questionnaire validation studies. These articles were published between 2004 and 2022, which were performed in more than 20 countries, particularly Germany (14) and Sweden (5). Thirteen different instruments were identified, of which 46.1% were developed in Europe. The most commonly used questionnaires were the Oswestry Disability Index and Nordic Standardized Questionnaire. In addition, five questionnaire validation studies were selected for methodological quality assessment, with only two studies demonstrating high methodological quality. The following three instruments were identified for assessing back pain specifically in athletes: Micheli Functional Scale, Persian Functional Rating Index, and Athlete Disability Index. This review confirmed that all three instruments were specifically designed to assess this condition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10624266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106242662023-11-04 Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review Azevedo, Vinicius Diniz Ferreira Silva, Regina Márcia de Carvalho Borges, Silvia Cristina Fernades, Michele da Silva Valadão Miñana-Signes, Vicente Monfort-Pañego, Manuel Silva Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E. Noll, Matias PLoS One Research Article Back pain in athletes varies with sport, age, and sex, which can impair athletic performance, thereby contributing to retirement. Studies on back pain in this population use questionnaires to assess components, such as pain intensity and location and factors associated with pain, among others. This study aimed to review validated questionnaires that have assessed back pain in athletes. This systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) by searching the databases Embase, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and Scopus. The articles were selected regardless of language and date of publication. Titles and abstracts were independently selected by two reviewers; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. All the steps were conducted using the software Rayyan. The methodological quality of the questionnaire validation articles was assessed using a critical appraisal tool checklist proposed by Brink and Louw. The search returned 4748 articles, of which 60 were selected for this review, including 5 questionnaire validation studies. These articles were published between 2004 and 2022, which were performed in more than 20 countries, particularly Germany (14) and Sweden (5). Thirteen different instruments were identified, of which 46.1% were developed in Europe. The most commonly used questionnaires were the Oswestry Disability Index and Nordic Standardized Questionnaire. In addition, five questionnaire validation studies were selected for methodological quality assessment, with only two studies demonstrating high methodological quality. The following three instruments were identified for assessing back pain specifically in athletes: Micheli Functional Scale, Persian Functional Rating Index, and Athlete Disability Index. This review confirmed that all three instruments were specifically designed to assess this condition. Public Library of Science 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10624266/ /pubmed/37922315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293333 Text en © 2023 Azevedo et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Azevedo, Vinicius Diniz
Ferreira Silva, Regina Márcia
de Carvalho Borges, Silvia Cristina
Fernades, Michele da Silva Valadão
Miñana-Signes, Vicente
Monfort-Pañego, Manuel
Silva Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E.
Noll, Matias
Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review
title Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review
title_full Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review
title_fullStr Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review
title_short Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review
title_sort instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37922315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293333
work_keys_str_mv AT azevedoviniciusdiniz instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview
AT ferreirasilvareginamarcia instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview
AT decarvalhoborgessilviacristina instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview
AT fernadesmicheledasilvavaladao instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview
AT minanasignesvicente instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview
AT monfortpanegomanuel instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview
AT silvanollpriscillarayannee instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview
AT nollmatias instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview