Cargando…
Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review
Back pain in athletes varies with sport, age, and sex, which can impair athletic performance, thereby contributing to retirement. Studies on back pain in this population use questionnaires to assess components, such as pain intensity and location and factors associated with pain, among others. This...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37922315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293333 |
_version_ | 1785130889769910272 |
---|---|
author | Azevedo, Vinicius Diniz Ferreira Silva, Regina Márcia de Carvalho Borges, Silvia Cristina Fernades, Michele da Silva Valadão Miñana-Signes, Vicente Monfort-Pañego, Manuel Silva Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E. Noll, Matias |
author_facet | Azevedo, Vinicius Diniz Ferreira Silva, Regina Márcia de Carvalho Borges, Silvia Cristina Fernades, Michele da Silva Valadão Miñana-Signes, Vicente Monfort-Pañego, Manuel Silva Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E. Noll, Matias |
author_sort | Azevedo, Vinicius Diniz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Back pain in athletes varies with sport, age, and sex, which can impair athletic performance, thereby contributing to retirement. Studies on back pain in this population use questionnaires to assess components, such as pain intensity and location and factors associated with pain, among others. This study aimed to review validated questionnaires that have assessed back pain in athletes. This systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) by searching the databases Embase, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and Scopus. The articles were selected regardless of language and date of publication. Titles and abstracts were independently selected by two reviewers; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. All the steps were conducted using the software Rayyan. The methodological quality of the questionnaire validation articles was assessed using a critical appraisal tool checklist proposed by Brink and Louw. The search returned 4748 articles, of which 60 were selected for this review, including 5 questionnaire validation studies. These articles were published between 2004 and 2022, which were performed in more than 20 countries, particularly Germany (14) and Sweden (5). Thirteen different instruments were identified, of which 46.1% were developed in Europe. The most commonly used questionnaires were the Oswestry Disability Index and Nordic Standardized Questionnaire. In addition, five questionnaire validation studies were selected for methodological quality assessment, with only two studies demonstrating high methodological quality. The following three instruments were identified for assessing back pain specifically in athletes: Micheli Functional Scale, Persian Functional Rating Index, and Athlete Disability Index. This review confirmed that all three instruments were specifically designed to assess this condition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10624266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106242662023-11-04 Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review Azevedo, Vinicius Diniz Ferreira Silva, Regina Márcia de Carvalho Borges, Silvia Cristina Fernades, Michele da Silva Valadão Miñana-Signes, Vicente Monfort-Pañego, Manuel Silva Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E. Noll, Matias PLoS One Research Article Back pain in athletes varies with sport, age, and sex, which can impair athletic performance, thereby contributing to retirement. Studies on back pain in this population use questionnaires to assess components, such as pain intensity and location and factors associated with pain, among others. This study aimed to review validated questionnaires that have assessed back pain in athletes. This systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) by searching the databases Embase, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and Scopus. The articles were selected regardless of language and date of publication. Titles and abstracts were independently selected by two reviewers; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. All the steps were conducted using the software Rayyan. The methodological quality of the questionnaire validation articles was assessed using a critical appraisal tool checklist proposed by Brink and Louw. The search returned 4748 articles, of which 60 were selected for this review, including 5 questionnaire validation studies. These articles were published between 2004 and 2022, which were performed in more than 20 countries, particularly Germany (14) and Sweden (5). Thirteen different instruments were identified, of which 46.1% were developed in Europe. The most commonly used questionnaires were the Oswestry Disability Index and Nordic Standardized Questionnaire. In addition, five questionnaire validation studies were selected for methodological quality assessment, with only two studies demonstrating high methodological quality. The following three instruments were identified for assessing back pain specifically in athletes: Micheli Functional Scale, Persian Functional Rating Index, and Athlete Disability Index. This review confirmed that all three instruments were specifically designed to assess this condition. Public Library of Science 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10624266/ /pubmed/37922315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293333 Text en © 2023 Azevedo et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Azevedo, Vinicius Diniz Ferreira Silva, Regina Márcia de Carvalho Borges, Silvia Cristina Fernades, Michele da Silva Valadão Miñana-Signes, Vicente Monfort-Pañego, Manuel Silva Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E. Noll, Matias Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review |
title | Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review |
title_full | Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review |
title_short | Instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: A systematic review |
title_sort | instruments for assessing back pain in athletes: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37922315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT azevedoviniciusdiniz instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview AT ferreirasilvareginamarcia instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview AT decarvalhoborgessilviacristina instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview AT fernadesmicheledasilvavaladao instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview AT minanasignesvicente instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview AT monfortpanegomanuel instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview AT silvanollpriscillarayannee instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview AT nollmatias instrumentsforassessingbackpaininathletesasystematicreview |