Cargando…
ChatGPT identifies gender disparities in scientific peer review
The peer review process is a critical step in ensuring the quality of scientific research. However, its subjectivity has raised concerns. To investigate this issue, I examined over 500 publicly available peer review reports from 200 published neuroscience papers in 2022–2023. OpenAI’s generative art...
Autor principal: | Verharen, Jeroen PH |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37922198 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.90230 |
Ejemplares similares
-
To ChatGPT or not to ChatGPT: the use of artificial intelligence in writing scientific papers
por: Marescotti, Manuela
Publicado: (2023) -
ChatGPT and scientific paper
por: Kleebayoon, Amnuay, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Correspondence: ChatGPT and scientific writing
por: Mungmunpuntipantip, Rujittika, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
ChatGPT in the field of scientific publication
por: Kleebayoon, Amnuay, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Using ChatGPT for language editing in scientific articles
por: Kim, Seong-Gon
Publicado: (2023)