Cargando…
Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), either used therapeutically or prophylactically, may yield more complications than conventional mastectomy. The incision may affect aesthetic outcome and complication rates, with periareolar incisions being associated with nipple–areolar complex (NAC) nec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005367 |
_version_ | 1785130929690247168 |
---|---|
author | Cavalcante, Francisco P. Lima, Ticiane O. Alcantara, Ryane Cardoso, Amanda Ulisses, Flora Novita, Guilherme Zerwes, Felipe Millen, Eduardo |
author_facet | Cavalcante, Francisco P. Lima, Ticiane O. Alcantara, Ryane Cardoso, Amanda Ulisses, Flora Novita, Guilherme Zerwes, Felipe Millen, Eduardo |
author_sort | Cavalcante, Francisco P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), either used therapeutically or prophylactically, may yield more complications than conventional mastectomy. The incision may affect aesthetic outcome and complication rates, with periareolar incisions being associated with nipple–areolar complex (NAC) necrosis. METHODS: Early complications were compared between NSM performed in 2015–2022 using inframammary fold (IMF) or periareolar incisions. RESULTS: Overall, 180 procedures in 152 patients (bilateral NSM = 28) were included (IMF = 104; periareolar = 76). Mean age (47 versus 43.9 years; P < 0.038), mastectomy weight (312.7 versus 246.8 grams; P < 0.001), implant volume (447.5 versus 409.0 mL; P = 0.002), and use of tissue expanders (68.4% versus 50.0%; P = 0.013) were all greater with periareolar incisions. Prepectoral reconstruction was more common with IMF (18.3% versus 3.9%; P = 0.004). Forty-three complications (23.9%) were recorded (periareolar n = 27, 35%; IMF n = 16, 15.3%; P = 0.0002). NAC necrosis accounted for 17 complications (22.4%) in the periareolar group versus nine (8.5%) in the IMF group (P = 0.002). Necrosis was predominantly moderate (n = 6, 8.3% versus n = 1, 1.0%, respectively) (P = 0.014). Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) for complications [3.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27–7.26] and necrosis (3.04; 95% CI: 1.27–7.27) were higher in the periareolar group. In the multivariate analysis, necrosis was associated with periareolar incisions [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.92; 95% CI: 1.14–7.44]. Prepectoral reconstruction was associated with IMF incisions (aOR: 25.51; 95% CI: 3.53–184.23; P = 0.001) and with body mass index of more than 25–30 (aOR: 37.09; 95% CI: 5.95–231.10; P < 0.001). Therapeutic mastectomies (aOR: 68.56; 95% CI: 2.50–188.36; P = 0.012) and tissue expanders (aOR: 18.36; 95% CI: 1.89–178.44; P = 0.026) were associated with seromas. CONCLUSIONS: Both incisions are viable options; however, the risk of NAC necrosis increased with the periareolar approach. Further research is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10624459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106244592023-11-04 Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy Cavalcante, Francisco P. Lima, Ticiane O. Alcantara, Ryane Cardoso, Amanda Ulisses, Flora Novita, Guilherme Zerwes, Felipe Millen, Eduardo Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), either used therapeutically or prophylactically, may yield more complications than conventional mastectomy. The incision may affect aesthetic outcome and complication rates, with periareolar incisions being associated with nipple–areolar complex (NAC) necrosis. METHODS: Early complications were compared between NSM performed in 2015–2022 using inframammary fold (IMF) or periareolar incisions. RESULTS: Overall, 180 procedures in 152 patients (bilateral NSM = 28) were included (IMF = 104; periareolar = 76). Mean age (47 versus 43.9 years; P < 0.038), mastectomy weight (312.7 versus 246.8 grams; P < 0.001), implant volume (447.5 versus 409.0 mL; P = 0.002), and use of tissue expanders (68.4% versus 50.0%; P = 0.013) were all greater with periareolar incisions. Prepectoral reconstruction was more common with IMF (18.3% versus 3.9%; P = 0.004). Forty-three complications (23.9%) were recorded (periareolar n = 27, 35%; IMF n = 16, 15.3%; P = 0.0002). NAC necrosis accounted for 17 complications (22.4%) in the periareolar group versus nine (8.5%) in the IMF group (P = 0.002). Necrosis was predominantly moderate (n = 6, 8.3% versus n = 1, 1.0%, respectively) (P = 0.014). Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) for complications [3.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27–7.26] and necrosis (3.04; 95% CI: 1.27–7.27) were higher in the periareolar group. In the multivariate analysis, necrosis was associated with periareolar incisions [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.92; 95% CI: 1.14–7.44]. Prepectoral reconstruction was associated with IMF incisions (aOR: 25.51; 95% CI: 3.53–184.23; P = 0.001) and with body mass index of more than 25–30 (aOR: 37.09; 95% CI: 5.95–231.10; P < 0.001). Therapeutic mastectomies (aOR: 68.56; 95% CI: 2.50–188.36; P = 0.012) and tissue expanders (aOR: 18.36; 95% CI: 1.89–178.44; P = 0.026) were associated with seromas. CONCLUSIONS: Both incisions are viable options; however, the risk of NAC necrosis increased with the periareolar approach. Further research is required. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10624459/ /pubmed/37928633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005367 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Breast Cavalcante, Francisco P. Lima, Ticiane O. Alcantara, Ryane Cardoso, Amanda Ulisses, Flora Novita, Guilherme Zerwes, Felipe Millen, Eduardo Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy |
title | Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy |
title_full | Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy |
title_fullStr | Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy |
title_short | Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy |
title_sort | inframammary versus periareolar incision: a comparison of early complications in nipple-sparing mastectomy |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005367 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cavalcantefranciscop inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy AT limaticianeo inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy AT alcantararyane inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy AT cardosoamanda inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy AT ulissesflora inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy AT novitaguilherme inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy AT zerwesfelipe inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy AT milleneduardo inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy |