Cargando…

Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), either used therapeutically or prophylactically, may yield more complications than conventional mastectomy. The incision may affect aesthetic outcome and complication rates, with periareolar incisions being associated with nipple–areolar complex (NAC) nec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cavalcante, Francisco P., Lima, Ticiane O., Alcantara, Ryane, Cardoso, Amanda, Ulisses, Flora, Novita, Guilherme, Zerwes, Felipe, Millen, Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005367
_version_ 1785130929690247168
author Cavalcante, Francisco P.
Lima, Ticiane O.
Alcantara, Ryane
Cardoso, Amanda
Ulisses, Flora
Novita, Guilherme
Zerwes, Felipe
Millen, Eduardo
author_facet Cavalcante, Francisco P.
Lima, Ticiane O.
Alcantara, Ryane
Cardoso, Amanda
Ulisses, Flora
Novita, Guilherme
Zerwes, Felipe
Millen, Eduardo
author_sort Cavalcante, Francisco P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), either used therapeutically or prophylactically, may yield more complications than conventional mastectomy. The incision may affect aesthetic outcome and complication rates, with periareolar incisions being associated with nipple–areolar complex (NAC) necrosis. METHODS: Early complications were compared between NSM performed in 2015–2022 using inframammary fold (IMF) or periareolar incisions. RESULTS: Overall, 180 procedures in 152 patients (bilateral NSM = 28) were included (IMF = 104; periareolar = 76). Mean age (47 versus 43.9 years; P < 0.038), mastectomy weight (312.7 versus 246.8 grams; P < 0.001), implant volume (447.5 versus 409.0 mL; P = 0.002), and use of tissue expanders (68.4% versus 50.0%; P = 0.013) were all greater with periareolar incisions. Prepectoral reconstruction was more common with IMF (18.3% versus 3.9%; P = 0.004). Forty-three complications (23.9%) were recorded (periareolar n = 27, 35%; IMF n = 16, 15.3%; P = 0.0002). NAC necrosis accounted for 17 complications (22.4%) in the periareolar group versus nine (8.5%) in the IMF group (P = 0.002). Necrosis was predominantly moderate (n = 6, 8.3% versus n = 1, 1.0%, respectively) (P = 0.014). Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) for complications [3.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27–7.26] and necrosis (3.04; 95% CI: 1.27–7.27) were higher in the periareolar group. In the multivariate analysis, necrosis was associated with periareolar incisions [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.92; 95% CI: 1.14–7.44]. Prepectoral reconstruction was associated with IMF incisions (aOR: 25.51; 95% CI: 3.53–184.23; P = 0.001) and with body mass index of more than 25–30 (aOR: 37.09; 95% CI: 5.95–231.10; P < 0.001). Therapeutic mastectomies (aOR: 68.56; 95% CI: 2.50–188.36; P = 0.012) and tissue expanders (aOR: 18.36; 95% CI: 1.89–178.44; P = 0.026) were associated with seromas. CONCLUSIONS: Both incisions are viable options; however, the risk of NAC necrosis increased with the periareolar approach. Further research is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10624459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106244592023-11-04 Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy Cavalcante, Francisco P. Lima, Ticiane O. Alcantara, Ryane Cardoso, Amanda Ulisses, Flora Novita, Guilherme Zerwes, Felipe Millen, Eduardo Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), either used therapeutically or prophylactically, may yield more complications than conventional mastectomy. The incision may affect aesthetic outcome and complication rates, with periareolar incisions being associated with nipple–areolar complex (NAC) necrosis. METHODS: Early complications were compared between NSM performed in 2015–2022 using inframammary fold (IMF) or periareolar incisions. RESULTS: Overall, 180 procedures in 152 patients (bilateral NSM = 28) were included (IMF = 104; periareolar = 76). Mean age (47 versus 43.9 years; P < 0.038), mastectomy weight (312.7 versus 246.8 grams; P < 0.001), implant volume (447.5 versus 409.0 mL; P = 0.002), and use of tissue expanders (68.4% versus 50.0%; P = 0.013) were all greater with periareolar incisions. Prepectoral reconstruction was more common with IMF (18.3% versus 3.9%; P = 0.004). Forty-three complications (23.9%) were recorded (periareolar n = 27, 35%; IMF n = 16, 15.3%; P = 0.0002). NAC necrosis accounted for 17 complications (22.4%) in the periareolar group versus nine (8.5%) in the IMF group (P = 0.002). Necrosis was predominantly moderate (n = 6, 8.3% versus n = 1, 1.0%, respectively) (P = 0.014). Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) for complications [3.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27–7.26] and necrosis (3.04; 95% CI: 1.27–7.27) were higher in the periareolar group. In the multivariate analysis, necrosis was associated with periareolar incisions [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.92; 95% CI: 1.14–7.44]. Prepectoral reconstruction was associated with IMF incisions (aOR: 25.51; 95% CI: 3.53–184.23; P = 0.001) and with body mass index of more than 25–30 (aOR: 37.09; 95% CI: 5.95–231.10; P < 0.001). Therapeutic mastectomies (aOR: 68.56; 95% CI: 2.50–188.36; P = 0.012) and tissue expanders (aOR: 18.36; 95% CI: 1.89–178.44; P = 0.026) were associated with seromas. CONCLUSIONS: Both incisions are viable options; however, the risk of NAC necrosis increased with the periareolar approach. Further research is required. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10624459/ /pubmed/37928633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005367 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Breast
Cavalcante, Francisco P.
Lima, Ticiane O.
Alcantara, Ryane
Cardoso, Amanda
Ulisses, Flora
Novita, Guilherme
Zerwes, Felipe
Millen, Eduardo
Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
title Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
title_full Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
title_fullStr Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
title_full_unstemmed Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
title_short Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
title_sort inframammary versus periareolar incision: a comparison of early complications in nipple-sparing mastectomy
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005367
work_keys_str_mv AT cavalcantefranciscop inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy
AT limaticianeo inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy
AT alcantararyane inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy
AT cardosoamanda inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy
AT ulissesflora inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy
AT novitaguilherme inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy
AT zerwesfelipe inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy
AT milleneduardo inframammaryversusperiareolarincisionacomparisonofearlycomplicationsinnipplesparingmastectomy