Cargando…

Evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system

OBJECTIVE: Case reports, tissue pathology, and autopsies have suggested that the hydrophilic polymer coating designed to improve endovascular deliverability and minimize vessel trauma can embolize and be associated with adverse outcomes such as ischemia, infarction, and death. This study sought to d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mordhorst, Alexa, Yang, Gary K., Reitsma, Nicholas, Chen, Jerry C., Zhang, Bei Yuan, Suri, Sahib, Gagnon, Joel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100127
_version_ 1785130945783791616
author Mordhorst, Alexa
Yang, Gary K.
Reitsma, Nicholas
Chen, Jerry C.
Zhang, Bei Yuan
Suri, Sahib
Gagnon, Joel
author_facet Mordhorst, Alexa
Yang, Gary K.
Reitsma, Nicholas
Chen, Jerry C.
Zhang, Bei Yuan
Suri, Sahib
Gagnon, Joel
author_sort Mordhorst, Alexa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Case reports, tissue pathology, and autopsies have suggested that the hydrophilic polymer coating designed to improve endovascular deliverability and minimize vessel trauma can embolize and be associated with adverse outcomes such as ischemia, infarction, and death. This study sought to determine whether hydrophilic polymers shed off commercially available sheaths in a controlled in vitro environment, with the hypothesis that significant differences between coated and uncoated (control) sheaths would be found. METHODS: Six sheaths from each manufacturer, including Zenith Alpha abdominal endovascular stent grafts (Cook Medical), DrySeal sheaths (W.L. Gore & Associates), and Sentrant Introducer sheaths (Medtronic), were tested in an in vitro environment. Noncoated Check-Flo performer introducer sheaths (Cook Medical) were used as controls. Each test circuit ran for 150 minutes at an output of 3 L/min, the circuit was then drained and the fluid collected. Quantitative analysis included weighing the dried filter paper and using particle size light scattering to quantify the particle size and count. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy was also used. RESULTS: Each of the three coated sheaths had significantly greater shedding compared with the control sheaths. The Cook Zenith alpha sheath had significantly more residue weight (2.87 ± 0.52 mg/L) than the Gore DrySeal (1.07 ± 0.06 mg/L) and Medtronic Sentrant introducer (0.98 ± 0.14 mg/L) sheaths. The average particle size was not significantly different between the coated and uncoated (control) sheaths. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy identified sheath particulate in the Cook Zenith Alpha and Medtronic Sentrant samples. CONCLUSIONS: Polymer embolization was present and significantly greater in all three commercially available hydrophilic sheaths compared with the control group. Further investigation is needed into the clinical significance of these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10624583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106245832023-11-05 Evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system Mordhorst, Alexa Yang, Gary K. Reitsma, Nicholas Chen, Jerry C. Zhang, Bei Yuan Suri, Sahib Gagnon, Joel JVS Vasc Sci Article OBJECTIVE: Case reports, tissue pathology, and autopsies have suggested that the hydrophilic polymer coating designed to improve endovascular deliverability and minimize vessel trauma can embolize and be associated with adverse outcomes such as ischemia, infarction, and death. This study sought to determine whether hydrophilic polymers shed off commercially available sheaths in a controlled in vitro environment, with the hypothesis that significant differences between coated and uncoated (control) sheaths would be found. METHODS: Six sheaths from each manufacturer, including Zenith Alpha abdominal endovascular stent grafts (Cook Medical), DrySeal sheaths (W.L. Gore & Associates), and Sentrant Introducer sheaths (Medtronic), were tested in an in vitro environment. Noncoated Check-Flo performer introducer sheaths (Cook Medical) were used as controls. Each test circuit ran for 150 minutes at an output of 3 L/min, the circuit was then drained and the fluid collected. Quantitative analysis included weighing the dried filter paper and using particle size light scattering to quantify the particle size and count. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy was also used. RESULTS: Each of the three coated sheaths had significantly greater shedding compared with the control sheaths. The Cook Zenith alpha sheath had significantly more residue weight (2.87 ± 0.52 mg/L) than the Gore DrySeal (1.07 ± 0.06 mg/L) and Medtronic Sentrant introducer (0.98 ± 0.14 mg/L) sheaths. The average particle size was not significantly different between the coated and uncoated (control) sheaths. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy identified sheath particulate in the Cook Zenith Alpha and Medtronic Sentrant samples. CONCLUSIONS: Polymer embolization was present and significantly greater in all three commercially available hydrophilic sheaths compared with the control group. Further investigation is needed into the clinical significance of these findings. Elsevier 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10624583/ /pubmed/37928834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100127 Text en Crown Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Society for Vascular Surgery. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mordhorst, Alexa
Yang, Gary K.
Reitsma, Nicholas
Chen, Jerry C.
Zhang, Bei Yuan
Suri, Sahib
Gagnon, Joel
Evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system
title Evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system
title_full Evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system
title_fullStr Evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system
title_short Evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system
title_sort evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100127
work_keys_str_mv AT mordhorstalexa evaluationofhydrophilicpolymerembolizationfromendovascularsheathdevicesinaninvitroperfusionsystem
AT yanggaryk evaluationofhydrophilicpolymerembolizationfromendovascularsheathdevicesinaninvitroperfusionsystem
AT reitsmanicholas evaluationofhydrophilicpolymerembolizationfromendovascularsheathdevicesinaninvitroperfusionsystem
AT chenjerryc evaluationofhydrophilicpolymerembolizationfromendovascularsheathdevicesinaninvitroperfusionsystem
AT zhangbeiyuan evaluationofhydrophilicpolymerembolizationfromendovascularsheathdevicesinaninvitroperfusionsystem
AT surisahib evaluationofhydrophilicpolymerembolizationfromendovascularsheathdevicesinaninvitroperfusionsystem
AT gagnonjoel evaluationofhydrophilicpolymerembolizationfromendovascularsheathdevicesinaninvitroperfusionsystem