Cargando…

Sex differences in children’s cognitive functions and phthalates exposure: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Phthalates exposure might affect children’s intelligence development. This study aimed to determine (1) whether sex and age affect cognitive function and (2) whether sex differences in cognitive performance are wider with higher phthalate concentrations. METHODS: Data were collected from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Yu-Chi, Xu, Yi-Jia, Chen, Jing-Kai, Boonhat, Hathaichon, Su, Bei-Yi, Lin, Yi-Chun, Lin, Ro-Ting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37264138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02672-5
_version_ 1785130949972852736
author Liao, Yu-Chi
Xu, Yi-Jia
Chen, Jing-Kai
Boonhat, Hathaichon
Su, Bei-Yi
Lin, Yi-Chun
Lin, Ro-Ting
author_facet Liao, Yu-Chi
Xu, Yi-Jia
Chen, Jing-Kai
Boonhat, Hathaichon
Su, Bei-Yi
Lin, Yi-Chun
Lin, Ro-Ting
author_sort Liao, Yu-Chi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phthalates exposure might affect children’s intelligence development. This study aimed to determine (1) whether sex and age affect cognitive function and (2) whether sex differences in cognitive performance are wider with higher phthalate concentrations. METHODS: Data were collected from PubMed (1998–2022), PROQUEST (1997–2022), and SpringerLink (1995–2022). The study followed the PRISMA process. The included articles were followed by PECO framework. The GRADE applied to assess the certainty of evidence. Of 2422 articles obtained, nine were selected using inclusion criteria. The random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled effects. RESULTS: Our meta-regression indicated a significant difference between sex differences with age at phthalate concentration assessment (β = −0.25; 95% CI = −0.47, −0.03) and MEHP concentration (β = −0.20; 95% CI = −0.37, −0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The limitation of the current article is it only provides information on intelligence level rather than other aspects of cognitive function. Thus, the sequelae of phthalate exposure on attention and executive function are still unclear. Our analysis shows significant difference between sex differences in cognitive function scores associated with age at phthalate concentration assessment. Girls might be more resilient in cognitive function at a younger age or during lower concentrations of phthalates metabolites. IMPACT: This is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled estimates of sex differences in objective cognitive functions among children with phthalate exposure. The female might be a protective factor when exposed to toxic plasticizers while the concentration is low. This study captures the possible role of sex in cognitive functioning and plasticizer exposure through a meta-analysis of children’s sex, cognitive scores, and plasticizer exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10624603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106246032023-11-05 Sex differences in children’s cognitive functions and phthalates exposure: a meta-analysis Liao, Yu-Chi Xu, Yi-Jia Chen, Jing-Kai Boonhat, Hathaichon Su, Bei-Yi Lin, Yi-Chun Lin, Ro-Ting Pediatr Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Phthalates exposure might affect children’s intelligence development. This study aimed to determine (1) whether sex and age affect cognitive function and (2) whether sex differences in cognitive performance are wider with higher phthalate concentrations. METHODS: Data were collected from PubMed (1998–2022), PROQUEST (1997–2022), and SpringerLink (1995–2022). The study followed the PRISMA process. The included articles were followed by PECO framework. The GRADE applied to assess the certainty of evidence. Of 2422 articles obtained, nine were selected using inclusion criteria. The random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled effects. RESULTS: Our meta-regression indicated a significant difference between sex differences with age at phthalate concentration assessment (β = −0.25; 95% CI = −0.47, −0.03) and MEHP concentration (β = −0.20; 95% CI = −0.37, −0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The limitation of the current article is it only provides information on intelligence level rather than other aspects of cognitive function. Thus, the sequelae of phthalate exposure on attention and executive function are still unclear. Our analysis shows significant difference between sex differences in cognitive function scores associated with age at phthalate concentration assessment. Girls might be more resilient in cognitive function at a younger age or during lower concentrations of phthalates metabolites. IMPACT: This is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled estimates of sex differences in objective cognitive functions among children with phthalate exposure. The female might be a protective factor when exposed to toxic plasticizers while the concentration is low. This study captures the possible role of sex in cognitive functioning and plasticizer exposure through a meta-analysis of children’s sex, cognitive scores, and plasticizer exposure. Nature Publishing Group US 2023-06-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10624603/ /pubmed/37264138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02672-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Liao, Yu-Chi
Xu, Yi-Jia
Chen, Jing-Kai
Boonhat, Hathaichon
Su, Bei-Yi
Lin, Yi-Chun
Lin, Ro-Ting
Sex differences in children’s cognitive functions and phthalates exposure: a meta-analysis
title Sex differences in children’s cognitive functions and phthalates exposure: a meta-analysis
title_full Sex differences in children’s cognitive functions and phthalates exposure: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Sex differences in children’s cognitive functions and phthalates exposure: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in children’s cognitive functions and phthalates exposure: a meta-analysis
title_short Sex differences in children’s cognitive functions and phthalates exposure: a meta-analysis
title_sort sex differences in children’s cognitive functions and phthalates exposure: a meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37264138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02672-5
work_keys_str_mv AT liaoyuchi sexdifferencesinchildrenscognitivefunctionsandphthalatesexposureametaanalysis
AT xuyijia sexdifferencesinchildrenscognitivefunctionsandphthalatesexposureametaanalysis
AT chenjingkai sexdifferencesinchildrenscognitivefunctionsandphthalatesexposureametaanalysis
AT boonhathathaichon sexdifferencesinchildrenscognitivefunctionsandphthalatesexposureametaanalysis
AT subeiyi sexdifferencesinchildrenscognitivefunctionsandphthalatesexposureametaanalysis
AT linyichun sexdifferencesinchildrenscognitivefunctionsandphthalatesexposureametaanalysis
AT linroting sexdifferencesinchildrenscognitivefunctionsandphthalatesexposureametaanalysis