Cargando…
Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant psychological impact worldwide. The COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (CPDI) is widely used to assess psychological stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although CPDI has been validated in Peru and Spain, no cross-cultural validation studies have been...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37923837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46235-4 |
_version_ | 1785130961681252352 |
---|---|
author | Böttcher, Fabian Pedraz-Petrozzi, Bruno Lamadé, Eva Kathrin Jimenez, Maria Pilar Rieker, Jennifer Reales, José Manuel Arevalo-Flores, Martin Anculle-Arauco, Víctor Krüger-Malpartida, Hever Ballesteros, Soledad |
author_facet | Böttcher, Fabian Pedraz-Petrozzi, Bruno Lamadé, Eva Kathrin Jimenez, Maria Pilar Rieker, Jennifer Reales, José Manuel Arevalo-Flores, Martin Anculle-Arauco, Víctor Krüger-Malpartida, Hever Ballesteros, Soledad |
author_sort | Böttcher, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant psychological impact worldwide. The COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (CPDI) is widely used to assess psychological stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although CPDI has been validated in Peru and Spain, no cross-cultural validation studies have been conducted. As an exploratory aim, differences in CPDI factorial scores between the most prevalent medical conditions in the two samples (arterial hypertension, respiratory diseases and anxious-depressive disorders) from a general population of Peru and Spain were investigated. We conducted secondary data analysis with data from Peru and Spain to validate the CPDI in a cross-cultural context. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) were performed to evaluate the factor structure and measurement invariance of the CPDI across cultural contexts. Concerning the exploratory analysis, we performed a U-Mann–Whitney test to evaluate differences in the factorial scores in the two samples. This study revealed a two-factor solution (stress and rumination/information) for the CPDI that included 21 of the 24 original items, and consistent with previous studies. The MGCFA demonstrated measurement invariance across cultural contexts (scalar invariance), indicating that the CPDI construct has the same meaning across both groups, regardless of cultural context and language variations of Spanish. Patients with anxious-depressive disorders showed higher CPDI factorial scores for both factors, whereas patients with respiratory diseases were only associated with the stress factor. This study provides evidence for the cross-cultural validity of the CPDI, highlighting its utility as a reliable instrument for assessing psychological stress in the context of COVID-19 across different cultures. These findings have important implications for developing and validating measures to assess psychological distress in different cultural contexts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10624667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106246672023-11-05 Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations Böttcher, Fabian Pedraz-Petrozzi, Bruno Lamadé, Eva Kathrin Jimenez, Maria Pilar Rieker, Jennifer Reales, José Manuel Arevalo-Flores, Martin Anculle-Arauco, Víctor Krüger-Malpartida, Hever Ballesteros, Soledad Sci Rep Article The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant psychological impact worldwide. The COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (CPDI) is widely used to assess psychological stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although CPDI has been validated in Peru and Spain, no cross-cultural validation studies have been conducted. As an exploratory aim, differences in CPDI factorial scores between the most prevalent medical conditions in the two samples (arterial hypertension, respiratory diseases and anxious-depressive disorders) from a general population of Peru and Spain were investigated. We conducted secondary data analysis with data from Peru and Spain to validate the CPDI in a cross-cultural context. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) were performed to evaluate the factor structure and measurement invariance of the CPDI across cultural contexts. Concerning the exploratory analysis, we performed a U-Mann–Whitney test to evaluate differences in the factorial scores in the two samples. This study revealed a two-factor solution (stress and rumination/information) for the CPDI that included 21 of the 24 original items, and consistent with previous studies. The MGCFA demonstrated measurement invariance across cultural contexts (scalar invariance), indicating that the CPDI construct has the same meaning across both groups, regardless of cultural context and language variations of Spanish. Patients with anxious-depressive disorders showed higher CPDI factorial scores for both factors, whereas patients with respiratory diseases were only associated with the stress factor. This study provides evidence for the cross-cultural validity of the CPDI, highlighting its utility as a reliable instrument for assessing psychological stress in the context of COVID-19 across different cultures. These findings have important implications for developing and validating measures to assess psychological distress in different cultural contexts. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10624667/ /pubmed/37923837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46235-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Böttcher, Fabian Pedraz-Petrozzi, Bruno Lamadé, Eva Kathrin Jimenez, Maria Pilar Rieker, Jennifer Reales, José Manuel Arevalo-Flores, Martin Anculle-Arauco, Víctor Krüger-Malpartida, Hever Ballesteros, Soledad Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations |
title | Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations |
title_full | Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations |
title_fullStr | Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations |
title_full_unstemmed | Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations |
title_short | Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations |
title_sort | cross-cultural validation of the covid-19 peritraumatic distress index (cpdi) among spanish and peruvian populations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37923837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46235-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bottcherfabian crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations AT pedrazpetrozzibruno crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations AT lamadeevakathrin crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations AT jimenezmariapilar crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations AT riekerjennifer crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations AT realesjosemanuel crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations AT arevalofloresmartin crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations AT ancullearaucovictor crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations AT krugermalpartidahever crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations AT ballesterossoledad crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations |