Cargando…

Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant psychological impact worldwide. The COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (CPDI) is widely used to assess psychological stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although CPDI has been validated in Peru and Spain, no cross-cultural validation studies have been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Böttcher, Fabian, Pedraz-Petrozzi, Bruno, Lamadé, Eva Kathrin, Jimenez, Maria Pilar, Rieker, Jennifer, Reales, José Manuel, Arevalo-Flores, Martin, Anculle-Arauco, Víctor, Krüger-Malpartida, Hever, Ballesteros, Soledad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37923837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46235-4
_version_ 1785130961681252352
author Böttcher, Fabian
Pedraz-Petrozzi, Bruno
Lamadé, Eva Kathrin
Jimenez, Maria Pilar
Rieker, Jennifer
Reales, José Manuel
Arevalo-Flores, Martin
Anculle-Arauco, Víctor
Krüger-Malpartida, Hever
Ballesteros, Soledad
author_facet Böttcher, Fabian
Pedraz-Petrozzi, Bruno
Lamadé, Eva Kathrin
Jimenez, Maria Pilar
Rieker, Jennifer
Reales, José Manuel
Arevalo-Flores, Martin
Anculle-Arauco, Víctor
Krüger-Malpartida, Hever
Ballesteros, Soledad
author_sort Böttcher, Fabian
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant psychological impact worldwide. The COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (CPDI) is widely used to assess psychological stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although CPDI has been validated in Peru and Spain, no cross-cultural validation studies have been conducted. As an exploratory aim, differences in CPDI factorial scores between the most prevalent medical conditions in the two samples (arterial hypertension, respiratory diseases and anxious-depressive disorders) from a general population of Peru and Spain were investigated. We conducted secondary data analysis with data from Peru and Spain to validate the CPDI in a cross-cultural context. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) were performed to evaluate the factor structure and measurement invariance of the CPDI across cultural contexts. Concerning the exploratory analysis, we performed a U-Mann–Whitney test to evaluate differences in the factorial scores in the two samples. This study revealed a two-factor solution (stress and rumination/information) for the CPDI that included 21 of the 24 original items, and consistent with previous studies. The MGCFA demonstrated measurement invariance across cultural contexts (scalar invariance), indicating that the CPDI construct has the same meaning across both groups, regardless of cultural context and language variations of Spanish. Patients with anxious-depressive disorders showed higher CPDI factorial scores for both factors, whereas patients with respiratory diseases were only associated with the stress factor. This study provides evidence for the cross-cultural validity of the CPDI, highlighting its utility as a reliable instrument for assessing psychological stress in the context of COVID-19 across different cultures. These findings have important implications for developing and validating measures to assess psychological distress in different cultural contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10624667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106246672023-11-05 Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations Böttcher, Fabian Pedraz-Petrozzi, Bruno Lamadé, Eva Kathrin Jimenez, Maria Pilar Rieker, Jennifer Reales, José Manuel Arevalo-Flores, Martin Anculle-Arauco, Víctor Krüger-Malpartida, Hever Ballesteros, Soledad Sci Rep Article The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant psychological impact worldwide. The COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (CPDI) is widely used to assess psychological stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although CPDI has been validated in Peru and Spain, no cross-cultural validation studies have been conducted. As an exploratory aim, differences in CPDI factorial scores between the most prevalent medical conditions in the two samples (arterial hypertension, respiratory diseases and anxious-depressive disorders) from a general population of Peru and Spain were investigated. We conducted secondary data analysis with data from Peru and Spain to validate the CPDI in a cross-cultural context. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) were performed to evaluate the factor structure and measurement invariance of the CPDI across cultural contexts. Concerning the exploratory analysis, we performed a U-Mann–Whitney test to evaluate differences in the factorial scores in the two samples. This study revealed a two-factor solution (stress and rumination/information) for the CPDI that included 21 of the 24 original items, and consistent with previous studies. The MGCFA demonstrated measurement invariance across cultural contexts (scalar invariance), indicating that the CPDI construct has the same meaning across both groups, regardless of cultural context and language variations of Spanish. Patients with anxious-depressive disorders showed higher CPDI factorial scores for both factors, whereas patients with respiratory diseases were only associated with the stress factor. This study provides evidence for the cross-cultural validity of the CPDI, highlighting its utility as a reliable instrument for assessing psychological stress in the context of COVID-19 across different cultures. These findings have important implications for developing and validating measures to assess psychological distress in different cultural contexts. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10624667/ /pubmed/37923837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46235-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Böttcher, Fabian
Pedraz-Petrozzi, Bruno
Lamadé, Eva Kathrin
Jimenez, Maria Pilar
Rieker, Jennifer
Reales, José Manuel
Arevalo-Flores, Martin
Anculle-Arauco, Víctor
Krüger-Malpartida, Hever
Ballesteros, Soledad
Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations
title Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations
title_full Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations
title_fullStr Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations
title_full_unstemmed Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations
title_short Cross-cultural validation of the COVID-19 peritraumatic distress index (CPDI) among Spanish and Peruvian populations
title_sort cross-cultural validation of the covid-19 peritraumatic distress index (cpdi) among spanish and peruvian populations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37923837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46235-4
work_keys_str_mv AT bottcherfabian crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations
AT pedrazpetrozzibruno crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations
AT lamadeevakathrin crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations
AT jimenezmariapilar crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations
AT riekerjennifer crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations
AT realesjosemanuel crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations
AT arevalofloresmartin crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations
AT ancullearaucovictor crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations
AT krugermalpartidahever crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations
AT ballesterossoledad crossculturalvalidationofthecovid19peritraumaticdistressindexcpdiamongspanishandperuvianpopulations