Cargando…

Outcome of posterior decompression for spinal epidural lipomatosis

BACKGROUND: In contrast to osteoligamentous lumbar stenosis (LSS), outcome of surgical treatment for spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is still not well defined. We present risk factors for SEL and clinical long-term outcome data after surgical treatment for patients with pure SEL and a mixed-type p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmutzer-Sondergeld, Michael, Zimmermann, Hanna, Trabold, Raimund, Liebig, Thomas, Schichor, Christian, Siller, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37743433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05814-0
_version_ 1785130973585735680
author Schmutzer-Sondergeld, Michael
Zimmermann, Hanna
Trabold, Raimund
Liebig, Thomas
Schichor, Christian
Siller, Sebastian
author_facet Schmutzer-Sondergeld, Michael
Zimmermann, Hanna
Trabold, Raimund
Liebig, Thomas
Schichor, Christian
Siller, Sebastian
author_sort Schmutzer-Sondergeld, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In contrast to osteoligamentous lumbar stenosis (LSS), outcome of surgical treatment for spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is still not well defined. We present risk factors for SEL and clinical long-term outcome data after surgical treatment for patients with pure SEL and a mixed-type pathology with combined SEL and LSS (SEL+LSS) compared to patients with pure LSS. METHODS: From our prospective institutional database, we identified all consecutive patients who were surgically treated for newly diagnosed SEL (n = 31) and SEL+LSS (n = 26) between 2018 and 2022. In addition, a matched control group of patients with pure LSS (n = 30) was compared. Microsurgical treatment aimed for posterior decompression of the spinal canal. Study endpoints were outcome data including clinical symptoms at presentation, MR-morphological analysis, evaluation of pain-free walking distance, pain perception by VAS-N/-R scales, and patient’s satisfaction by determination of the Odom score. RESULTS: Patients with osteoligamentous SEL were significantly more likely to suffer from obesity (body mass index (BMI) of 30.2 ± 5.5 kg/m(2), p = 0.03), lumbar pain (p = 0.006), and to have received long-term steroid therapy (p = 0.01) compared to patients with SEL+LSS and LSS. In all three groups, posterior decompression of the spinal canal resulted in significant improvement of these symptoms. Patients with SEL had a significant increase in pain-free walking distance during the postoperative course, at discharge, and last follow-up (FU) (p < 0.0001), similar to patients with SEL+LSS and pure LSS. In addition, patients with pure SEL and SEL+LSS had a significant reduction in pain perception, represented by smaller values of VAS-N and -R postoperatively and at FU, similar to patients with pure LSS. In uni- and multivariate analysis, domination of lumbar pain and steroid long-term therapy were significant characteristic risk factors for SEL. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of pure SEL and SEL+LSS allows significant improvement in pain-free walking distance and pain perception immediately postoperatively and in long-term FU, similar to patients with pure LSS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10624717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106247172023-11-05 Outcome of posterior decompression for spinal epidural lipomatosis Schmutzer-Sondergeld, Michael Zimmermann, Hanna Trabold, Raimund Liebig, Thomas Schichor, Christian Siller, Sebastian Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article BACKGROUND: In contrast to osteoligamentous lumbar stenosis (LSS), outcome of surgical treatment for spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is still not well defined. We present risk factors for SEL and clinical long-term outcome data after surgical treatment for patients with pure SEL and a mixed-type pathology with combined SEL and LSS (SEL+LSS) compared to patients with pure LSS. METHODS: From our prospective institutional database, we identified all consecutive patients who were surgically treated for newly diagnosed SEL (n = 31) and SEL+LSS (n = 26) between 2018 and 2022. In addition, a matched control group of patients with pure LSS (n = 30) was compared. Microsurgical treatment aimed for posterior decompression of the spinal canal. Study endpoints were outcome data including clinical symptoms at presentation, MR-morphological analysis, evaluation of pain-free walking distance, pain perception by VAS-N/-R scales, and patient’s satisfaction by determination of the Odom score. RESULTS: Patients with osteoligamentous SEL were significantly more likely to suffer from obesity (body mass index (BMI) of 30.2 ± 5.5 kg/m(2), p = 0.03), lumbar pain (p = 0.006), and to have received long-term steroid therapy (p = 0.01) compared to patients with SEL+LSS and LSS. In all three groups, posterior decompression of the spinal canal resulted in significant improvement of these symptoms. Patients with SEL had a significant increase in pain-free walking distance during the postoperative course, at discharge, and last follow-up (FU) (p < 0.0001), similar to patients with SEL+LSS and pure LSS. In addition, patients with pure SEL and SEL+LSS had a significant reduction in pain perception, represented by smaller values of VAS-N and -R postoperatively and at FU, similar to patients with pure LSS. In uni- and multivariate analysis, domination of lumbar pain and steroid long-term therapy were significant characteristic risk factors for SEL. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of pure SEL and SEL+LSS allows significant improvement in pain-free walking distance and pain perception immediately postoperatively and in long-term FU, similar to patients with pure LSS. Springer Vienna 2023-09-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10624717/ /pubmed/37743433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05814-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Schmutzer-Sondergeld, Michael
Zimmermann, Hanna
Trabold, Raimund
Liebig, Thomas
Schichor, Christian
Siller, Sebastian
Outcome of posterior decompression for spinal epidural lipomatosis
title Outcome of posterior decompression for spinal epidural lipomatosis
title_full Outcome of posterior decompression for spinal epidural lipomatosis
title_fullStr Outcome of posterior decompression for spinal epidural lipomatosis
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of posterior decompression for spinal epidural lipomatosis
title_short Outcome of posterior decompression for spinal epidural lipomatosis
title_sort outcome of posterior decompression for spinal epidural lipomatosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37743433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05814-0
work_keys_str_mv AT schmutzersondergeldmichael outcomeofposteriordecompressionforspinalepidurallipomatosis
AT zimmermannhanna outcomeofposteriordecompressionforspinalepidurallipomatosis
AT traboldraimund outcomeofposteriordecompressionforspinalepidurallipomatosis
AT liebigthomas outcomeofposteriordecompressionforspinalepidurallipomatosis
AT schichorchristian outcomeofposteriordecompressionforspinalepidurallipomatosis
AT sillersebastian outcomeofposteriordecompressionforspinalepidurallipomatosis