Cargando…

Epistemic Injustice and Nonmaleficence

Epistemic injustice has undergone a steady growth in the medical ethics literature throughout the last decade as many ethicists have found it to be a powerful tool for describing and assessing morally problematic situations in healthcare. However, surprisingly scarce attention has been devoted to ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Della Croce, Yoann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37378755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10273-4
_version_ 1785130974049206272
author Della Croce, Yoann
author_facet Della Croce, Yoann
author_sort Della Croce, Yoann
collection PubMed
description Epistemic injustice has undergone a steady growth in the medical ethics literature throughout the last decade as many ethicists have found it to be a powerful tool for describing and assessing morally problematic situations in healthcare. However, surprisingly scarce attention has been devoted to how epistemic injustice relates to physicians’ professional duties on a conceptual level. I argue that epistemic injustice, specifically testimonial, collides with physicians’ duty of nonmaleficence and should thus be actively fought against in healthcare encounters on the ground of professional conduct. I do so by fleshing out how Fricker’s conception of testimonial injustice conflicts with the duty of nonmaleficence as defined in Beauchamp and Childress on theoretical grounds. From there, I argue that testimonial injustice produces two distinct types of harm, epistemic and non-epistemic. Epistemic harms are harms inflicted by the physician to the patient qua knower, whereas non-epistemic harms are inflicted to the patient qua patient. This latter case holds serious clinical implications and represent a failure of the process of due care on the part of the physician. I illustrate this through examples taken from the literature on fibromyalgia syndrome and show how testimonial injustice causes wrongful harm to patients, making it maleficent practice. Finally, I conclude on why nonmaleficence as a principle will not be normatively enough to fully address the problem of epistemic injustice in healthcare but nevertheless may serve as a good starting point in attempting to do so.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10624719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106247192023-11-05 Epistemic Injustice and Nonmaleficence Della Croce, Yoann J Bioeth Inq Original Research Epistemic injustice has undergone a steady growth in the medical ethics literature throughout the last decade as many ethicists have found it to be a powerful tool for describing and assessing morally problematic situations in healthcare. However, surprisingly scarce attention has been devoted to how epistemic injustice relates to physicians’ professional duties on a conceptual level. I argue that epistemic injustice, specifically testimonial, collides with physicians’ duty of nonmaleficence and should thus be actively fought against in healthcare encounters on the ground of professional conduct. I do so by fleshing out how Fricker’s conception of testimonial injustice conflicts with the duty of nonmaleficence as defined in Beauchamp and Childress on theoretical grounds. From there, I argue that testimonial injustice produces two distinct types of harm, epistemic and non-epistemic. Epistemic harms are harms inflicted by the physician to the patient qua knower, whereas non-epistemic harms are inflicted to the patient qua patient. This latter case holds serious clinical implications and represent a failure of the process of due care on the part of the physician. I illustrate this through examples taken from the literature on fibromyalgia syndrome and show how testimonial injustice causes wrongful harm to patients, making it maleficent practice. Finally, I conclude on why nonmaleficence as a principle will not be normatively enough to fully address the problem of epistemic injustice in healthcare but nevertheless may serve as a good starting point in attempting to do so. Springer Nature Singapore 2023-06-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10624719/ /pubmed/37378755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10273-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Della Croce, Yoann
Epistemic Injustice and Nonmaleficence
title Epistemic Injustice and Nonmaleficence
title_full Epistemic Injustice and Nonmaleficence
title_fullStr Epistemic Injustice and Nonmaleficence
title_full_unstemmed Epistemic Injustice and Nonmaleficence
title_short Epistemic Injustice and Nonmaleficence
title_sort epistemic injustice and nonmaleficence
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37378755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10273-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dellacroceyoann epistemicinjusticeandnonmaleficence