Cargando…

Living well while providing support: validation of LTCQ-Carer for assessing informal carers’ quality of life

PURPOSE: Despite international policies to support the health and wellbeing of informal (family) caregivers, there is no consensus on how to evaluate the effectiveness of carer support. We aimed to develop and validate a new quality-of-life measure for carers (LTCQ-Carer) and to assess its potential...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Potter, Caroline M., Peters, Michele, Cundell, Maureen, McShane, Rupert, Fitzpatrick, Ray
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37530960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03485-z
_version_ 1785130981582176256
author Potter, Caroline M.
Peters, Michele
Cundell, Maureen
McShane, Rupert
Fitzpatrick, Ray
author_facet Potter, Caroline M.
Peters, Michele
Cundell, Maureen
McShane, Rupert
Fitzpatrick, Ray
author_sort Potter, Caroline M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Despite international policies to support the health and wellbeing of informal (family) caregivers, there is no consensus on how to evaluate the effectiveness of carer support. We aimed to develop and validate a new quality-of-life measure for carers (LTCQ-Carer) and to assess its potential for use within a clinical pathway. METHODS: Psychometric properties of LTCQ-Carer were tested through cognitive interviews (qualitative phase) and a pilot survey (quantitative phase). Participants were family caregivers of people recently diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia, recruited through one of 14 memory clinics in south-east England. They self-completed the new measure and comparative existing measures (EQ-5D, ASCOT-Carer). Ongoing feedback from memory clinic staff on potential use of LTCQ-Carer was collected. RESULTS: Interview participants (n = 10) found all draft items of LTCQ-Carer relevant and prompted inclusion of a new item on ‘time to yourself’. Responses from survey participants (n = 107) indicated acceptability (low missing data), high internal reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.95), and a general construct (single factor loadings 0.43–0.86 for all items). Observation of predicted associations with EQ-5D and ASCOT-Carer supported construct validity. Responsiveness requires further testing as evidence was inconclusive. Clinical staff feedback on potential use was positive. CONCLUSION: LTCQ-Carer is a valid new measure for assessing family caregivers’ quality of life across broad health and social care domains, expanding the range of high-quality tools for evaluating carer support. When used concurrently with patient assessment, it could highlight carer needs and prompt appropriate family support at the earliest point in the clinical pathway.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10624753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106247532023-11-05 Living well while providing support: validation of LTCQ-Carer for assessing informal carers’ quality of life Potter, Caroline M. Peters, Michele Cundell, Maureen McShane, Rupert Fitzpatrick, Ray Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: Despite international policies to support the health and wellbeing of informal (family) caregivers, there is no consensus on how to evaluate the effectiveness of carer support. We aimed to develop and validate a new quality-of-life measure for carers (LTCQ-Carer) and to assess its potential for use within a clinical pathway. METHODS: Psychometric properties of LTCQ-Carer were tested through cognitive interviews (qualitative phase) and a pilot survey (quantitative phase). Participants were family caregivers of people recently diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia, recruited through one of 14 memory clinics in south-east England. They self-completed the new measure and comparative existing measures (EQ-5D, ASCOT-Carer). Ongoing feedback from memory clinic staff on potential use of LTCQ-Carer was collected. RESULTS: Interview participants (n = 10) found all draft items of LTCQ-Carer relevant and prompted inclusion of a new item on ‘time to yourself’. Responses from survey participants (n = 107) indicated acceptability (low missing data), high internal reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.95), and a general construct (single factor loadings 0.43–0.86 for all items). Observation of predicted associations with EQ-5D and ASCOT-Carer supported construct validity. Responsiveness requires further testing as evidence was inconclusive. Clinical staff feedback on potential use was positive. CONCLUSION: LTCQ-Carer is a valid new measure for assessing family caregivers’ quality of life across broad health and social care domains, expanding the range of high-quality tools for evaluating carer support. When used concurrently with patient assessment, it could highlight carer needs and prompt appropriate family support at the earliest point in the clinical pathway. Springer International Publishing 2023-08-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10624753/ /pubmed/37530960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03485-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Potter, Caroline M.
Peters, Michele
Cundell, Maureen
McShane, Rupert
Fitzpatrick, Ray
Living well while providing support: validation of LTCQ-Carer for assessing informal carers’ quality of life
title Living well while providing support: validation of LTCQ-Carer for assessing informal carers’ quality of life
title_full Living well while providing support: validation of LTCQ-Carer for assessing informal carers’ quality of life
title_fullStr Living well while providing support: validation of LTCQ-Carer for assessing informal carers’ quality of life
title_full_unstemmed Living well while providing support: validation of LTCQ-Carer for assessing informal carers’ quality of life
title_short Living well while providing support: validation of LTCQ-Carer for assessing informal carers’ quality of life
title_sort living well while providing support: validation of ltcq-carer for assessing informal carers’ quality of life
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37530960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03485-z
work_keys_str_mv AT pottercarolinem livingwellwhileprovidingsupportvalidationofltcqcarerforassessinginformalcarersqualityoflife
AT petersmichele livingwellwhileprovidingsupportvalidationofltcqcarerforassessinginformalcarersqualityoflife
AT cundellmaureen livingwellwhileprovidingsupportvalidationofltcqcarerforassessinginformalcarersqualityoflife
AT mcshanerupert livingwellwhileprovidingsupportvalidationofltcqcarerforassessinginformalcarersqualityoflife
AT fitzpatrickray livingwellwhileprovidingsupportvalidationofltcqcarerforassessinginformalcarersqualityoflife