Cargando…

Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing: does level of training matter?

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of pertrochanteric fractures is one of the most performed surgeries in orthogeriatrics. Proximal femoral nailing, the most performed procedure, is often used as a training surgery for young residents. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relevance of the res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haslhofer, D. J., Stiftinger, J. M., Kraml, N., Dannbauer, F., Schmolmüller, C., Gotterbarm, T., Kwasny, O., Klasan, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37923919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00737-z
_version_ 1785130987459444736
author Haslhofer, D. J.
Stiftinger, J. M.
Kraml, N.
Dannbauer, F.
Schmolmüller, C.
Gotterbarm, T.
Kwasny, O.
Klasan, A.
author_facet Haslhofer, D. J.
Stiftinger, J. M.
Kraml, N.
Dannbauer, F.
Schmolmüller, C.
Gotterbarm, T.
Kwasny, O.
Klasan, A.
author_sort Haslhofer, D. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of pertrochanteric fractures is one of the most performed surgeries in orthogeriatrics. Proximal femoral nailing, the most performed procedure, is often used as a training surgery for young residents. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relevance of the resident’s training level to complication rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study. Surgeons were divided into four groups according to their training level. Complications included infection, cut-out, and revision surgery. The study was performed at a level 1 trauma center. All patients who were treated with proximal femoral nailing surgery with a radiological follow-up of at least 3 months were included. RESULTS: Of the 955 patients extracted, a total of 564 patients met the inclusion criteria. Second-year residents had significantly higher cut-out rates (p = 0.012). Further analysis indicated a correlation between level of training and surgery duration (p < 0.001) as well as a correlation between surgery duration and infection rate (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was 11.2%. Analyzing overall complications, no significant difference was found when comparing surgeon groups (p = 0.3). No statistically significant difference was found concerning infection (p = 0.6), cut-out (p = 0.7), and revision surgery (p = 0.3) either. CONCLUSION: Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing are not higher in patients who are treated by residents. Therefore, proximal femoral nailing is an excellent procedure for general orthopedic training. However, we must keep in mind that accurate positioning of the femoral neck screw is essential to keep cut-out rates as low as possible. Level of Evidence III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10624794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106247942023-11-05 Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing: does level of training matter? Haslhofer, D. J. Stiftinger, J. M. Kraml, N. Dannbauer, F. Schmolmüller, C. Gotterbarm, T. Kwasny, O. Klasan, A. J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of pertrochanteric fractures is one of the most performed surgeries in orthogeriatrics. Proximal femoral nailing, the most performed procedure, is often used as a training surgery for young residents. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relevance of the resident’s training level to complication rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study. Surgeons were divided into four groups according to their training level. Complications included infection, cut-out, and revision surgery. The study was performed at a level 1 trauma center. All patients who were treated with proximal femoral nailing surgery with a radiological follow-up of at least 3 months were included. RESULTS: Of the 955 patients extracted, a total of 564 patients met the inclusion criteria. Second-year residents had significantly higher cut-out rates (p = 0.012). Further analysis indicated a correlation between level of training and surgery duration (p < 0.001) as well as a correlation between surgery duration and infection rate (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was 11.2%. Analyzing overall complications, no significant difference was found when comparing surgeon groups (p = 0.3). No statistically significant difference was found concerning infection (p = 0.6), cut-out (p = 0.7), and revision surgery (p = 0.3) either. CONCLUSION: Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing are not higher in patients who are treated by residents. Therefore, proximal femoral nailing is an excellent procedure for general orthopedic training. However, we must keep in mind that accurate positioning of the femoral neck screw is essential to keep cut-out rates as low as possible. Level of Evidence III. Springer International Publishing 2023-11-03 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10624794/ /pubmed/37923919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00737-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Haslhofer, D. J.
Stiftinger, J. M.
Kraml, N.
Dannbauer, F.
Schmolmüller, C.
Gotterbarm, T.
Kwasny, O.
Klasan, A.
Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing: does level of training matter?
title Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing: does level of training matter?
title_full Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing: does level of training matter?
title_fullStr Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing: does level of training matter?
title_full_unstemmed Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing: does level of training matter?
title_short Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing: does level of training matter?
title_sort complication rates after proximal femoral nailing: does level of training matter?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37923919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00737-z
work_keys_str_mv AT haslhoferdj complicationratesafterproximalfemoralnailingdoesleveloftrainingmatter
AT stiftingerjm complicationratesafterproximalfemoralnailingdoesleveloftrainingmatter
AT kramln complicationratesafterproximalfemoralnailingdoesleveloftrainingmatter
AT dannbauerf complicationratesafterproximalfemoralnailingdoesleveloftrainingmatter
AT schmolmullerc complicationratesafterproximalfemoralnailingdoesleveloftrainingmatter
AT gotterbarmt complicationratesafterproximalfemoralnailingdoesleveloftrainingmatter
AT kwasnyo complicationratesafterproximalfemoralnailingdoesleveloftrainingmatter
AT klasana complicationratesafterproximalfemoralnailingdoesleveloftrainingmatter