Cargando…

Pulsed Radiofrequency 2 Hz Preserves the Dorsal Root Ganglion Neuron Physiological Ca(2+) Influx, Cytosolic ATP Level, Δψm, and pERK Compared to 4 Hz: An Insight on the Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency in Pain Management

BACKGROUND: Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is beneficial for radicular pain and is commonly administered at pulse frequencies of 2 or 4 Hz. However, its effects on healthy neurons have not yet been widely studied. This study aims to determine the effect of PRF at 2 Hz and 4 Hz on the physiology of heal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laksono, Ristiawan Muji, Siswagama, Taufiq Agus, Nery, Fa’urinda Riam Prabu, van der Weegen, Walter, Halim, Willy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928061
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S424489
_version_ 1785131109170806784
author Laksono, Ristiawan Muji
Siswagama, Taufiq Agus
Nery, Fa’urinda Riam Prabu
van der Weegen, Walter
Halim, Willy
author_facet Laksono, Ristiawan Muji
Siswagama, Taufiq Agus
Nery, Fa’urinda Riam Prabu
van der Weegen, Walter
Halim, Willy
author_sort Laksono, Ristiawan Muji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is beneficial for radicular pain and is commonly administered at pulse frequencies of 2 or 4 Hz. However, its effects on healthy neurons have not yet been widely studied. This study aims to determine the effect of PRF at 2 Hz and 4 Hz on the physiology of healthy dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. METHODS: An in vitro experimental study was conducted using DRG neuron cultures divided into three groups. Control cells received no treatment, one cell group received 20 ms 2 Hz PRF for 360 s, and one cell group received a 4 Hz PRF 10 ms pulse for 360 s with similar energy. Ca(2+) influx, mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm), cytosolic Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK) levels were measured. The data were analyzed using the One-Way ANOVA variance with α=5%. RESULTS: DRG neurons exposed to PRF 2 Hz did not experience a significant change in Ca(2+) influx, whereas PRF 4 Hz caused a significant decrease in Ca(2+) influx compared to the basal level. PRF at 2 Hz did not cause a change in Δψm, whereas PRF at 4 Hz caused a significant decrease in Δψm (p<0.05). Both 2 and 4 Hz PRF resulted in a significant elevation in cytosolic ATP concentration, but the 2 Hz PRF had a higher cytosolic ATP than the 4 Hz group (p<0.05). Both 2 and 4 Hz did not show a significant difference in pERK intensity with respect to the control (p>0.05), indicating that there was no significant neuron activation. CONCLUSION: Both frequencies did not significantly activate DRG neurons, but with similar energy delivery, PRF 2 Hz preserved the physiological properties of healthy neurons better than PRF 4 Hz did. A 2 Hz PRF is the preferred frequency in clinical applications for neuron-targeted therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10625322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106253222023-11-05 Pulsed Radiofrequency 2 Hz Preserves the Dorsal Root Ganglion Neuron Physiological Ca(2+) Influx, Cytosolic ATP Level, Δψm, and pERK Compared to 4 Hz: An Insight on the Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency in Pain Management Laksono, Ristiawan Muji Siswagama, Taufiq Agus Nery, Fa’urinda Riam Prabu van der Weegen, Walter Halim, Willy J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is beneficial for radicular pain and is commonly administered at pulse frequencies of 2 or 4 Hz. However, its effects on healthy neurons have not yet been widely studied. This study aims to determine the effect of PRF at 2 Hz and 4 Hz on the physiology of healthy dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. METHODS: An in vitro experimental study was conducted using DRG neuron cultures divided into three groups. Control cells received no treatment, one cell group received 20 ms 2 Hz PRF for 360 s, and one cell group received a 4 Hz PRF 10 ms pulse for 360 s with similar energy. Ca(2+) influx, mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm), cytosolic Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK) levels were measured. The data were analyzed using the One-Way ANOVA variance with α=5%. RESULTS: DRG neurons exposed to PRF 2 Hz did not experience a significant change in Ca(2+) influx, whereas PRF 4 Hz caused a significant decrease in Ca(2+) influx compared to the basal level. PRF at 2 Hz did not cause a change in Δψm, whereas PRF at 4 Hz caused a significant decrease in Δψm (p<0.05). Both 2 and 4 Hz PRF resulted in a significant elevation in cytosolic ATP concentration, but the 2 Hz PRF had a higher cytosolic ATP than the 4 Hz group (p<0.05). Both 2 and 4 Hz did not show a significant difference in pERK intensity with respect to the control (p>0.05), indicating that there was no significant neuron activation. CONCLUSION: Both frequencies did not significantly activate DRG neurons, but with similar energy delivery, PRF 2 Hz preserved the physiological properties of healthy neurons better than PRF 4 Hz did. A 2 Hz PRF is the preferred frequency in clinical applications for neuron-targeted therapy. Dove 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10625322/ /pubmed/37928061 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S424489 Text en © 2023 Laksono et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Laksono, Ristiawan Muji
Siswagama, Taufiq Agus
Nery, Fa’urinda Riam Prabu
van der Weegen, Walter
Halim, Willy
Pulsed Radiofrequency 2 Hz Preserves the Dorsal Root Ganglion Neuron Physiological Ca(2+) Influx, Cytosolic ATP Level, Δψm, and pERK Compared to 4 Hz: An Insight on the Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency in Pain Management
title Pulsed Radiofrequency 2 Hz Preserves the Dorsal Root Ganglion Neuron Physiological Ca(2+) Influx, Cytosolic ATP Level, Δψm, and pERK Compared to 4 Hz: An Insight on the Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency in Pain Management
title_full Pulsed Radiofrequency 2 Hz Preserves the Dorsal Root Ganglion Neuron Physiological Ca(2+) Influx, Cytosolic ATP Level, Δψm, and pERK Compared to 4 Hz: An Insight on the Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency in Pain Management
title_fullStr Pulsed Radiofrequency 2 Hz Preserves the Dorsal Root Ganglion Neuron Physiological Ca(2+) Influx, Cytosolic ATP Level, Δψm, and pERK Compared to 4 Hz: An Insight on the Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency in Pain Management
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed Radiofrequency 2 Hz Preserves the Dorsal Root Ganglion Neuron Physiological Ca(2+) Influx, Cytosolic ATP Level, Δψm, and pERK Compared to 4 Hz: An Insight on the Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency in Pain Management
title_short Pulsed Radiofrequency 2 Hz Preserves the Dorsal Root Ganglion Neuron Physiological Ca(2+) Influx, Cytosolic ATP Level, Δψm, and pERK Compared to 4 Hz: An Insight on the Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency in Pain Management
title_sort pulsed radiofrequency 2 hz preserves the dorsal root ganglion neuron physiological ca(2+) influx, cytosolic atp level, δψm, and perk compared to 4 hz: an insight on the safety of pulsed radiofrequency in pain management
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37928061
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S424489
work_keys_str_mv AT laksonoristiawanmuji pulsedradiofrequency2hzpreservesthedorsalrootganglionneuronphysiologicalca2influxcytosolicatpleveldpsmandperkcomparedto4hzaninsightonthesafetyofpulsedradiofrequencyinpainmanagement
AT siswagamataufiqagus pulsedradiofrequency2hzpreservesthedorsalrootganglionneuronphysiologicalca2influxcytosolicatpleveldpsmandperkcomparedto4hzaninsightonthesafetyofpulsedradiofrequencyinpainmanagement
AT neryfaurindariamprabu pulsedradiofrequency2hzpreservesthedorsalrootganglionneuronphysiologicalca2influxcytosolicatpleveldpsmandperkcomparedto4hzaninsightonthesafetyofpulsedradiofrequencyinpainmanagement
AT vanderweegenwalter pulsedradiofrequency2hzpreservesthedorsalrootganglionneuronphysiologicalca2influxcytosolicatpleveldpsmandperkcomparedto4hzaninsightonthesafetyofpulsedradiofrequencyinpainmanagement
AT halimwilly pulsedradiofrequency2hzpreservesthedorsalrootganglionneuronphysiologicalca2influxcytosolicatpleveldpsmandperkcomparedto4hzaninsightonthesafetyofpulsedradiofrequencyinpainmanagement