Cargando…

High Rate of Loss to Follow-Up Among Patients Undergoing Treatment for Premalignant Cervical Lesions at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Southwestern Uganda: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: For a cervical cancer control program to be effective in reducing the incidence of the disease, there should be high compliance to treatment and follow-up of women diagnosed with precursor lesions. Screening programs in low-resource countries such as Uganda are challenged by poor adheren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kajabwangu, Rogers, Ssedyabane, Frank, Tusubira, Deusdedit, Maling, Samuel, Kakongi, Natthan, Turyakira, Eleanor, Namuli, Alexcer, Galiwango, Martin, Randall, Thomas C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37927695
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46542
Descripción
Sumario:Background: For a cervical cancer control program to be effective in reducing the incidence of the disease, there should be high compliance to treatment and follow-up of women diagnosed with precursor lesions. Screening programs in low-resource countries such as Uganda are challenged by poor adherence to follow-up following treatment for premalignant cervical lesions. This study sought to describe the burden and factors associated with loss to follow-up among women undergoing treatment for premalignant cervical lesions at a tertiary hospital in southwestern Uganda. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. We reviewed the registers at the Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH) cervical cancer clinic for a period of four years from January 2017 to December 2020. Data on age, district of residence, diagnosis, date of diagnosis, date and type of initial treatment, and date of follow-up visit were collected. We also captured data on whether patients returned on the scheduled follow-up date or within three months after the scheduled follow-up date. We defined loss to follow-up as failure to return for follow-up either on the scheduled date or within three months after the scheduled date. Results: Out of the 298 patients who underwent treatment for premalignant cervical lesions in the study period, 227 (76.2%) did not return for follow-up at one year. At bivariate analysis, failure to attend the review visit at six weeks predicted the loss to follow-up at one year following treatment for premalignant lesions almost perfectly (risk ratio (RR)=2.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.18-3.71, p<0.001). Negative HIV serostatus and receiving thermocoagulation slightly increased the risk of getting lost to follow-up, while being more than 45 years old reduced the odds. At multivariate analysis, treatment with thermocoagulation (adjusted risk ratio (aRR)=1.21, 95% CI: 1.07-1.36, p=0.03) was associated with loss to follow-up at one year. Conclusion: The proportion of women who did not return for follow-up at one year following treatment for premalignant cervical lesions at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital is very high. There is a need to implement strategies such as telephone-aided reminders to prompt patients to return for follow-up following treatment for premalignant cervical lesions.