Cargando…
Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions
In response to the escalating global obesity crisis and its associated health and financial burdens, this paper presents a novel methodology for analyzing longitudinal weight loss data and assessing the effectiveness of financial incentives. Drawing from the Keep It Off trial—a three-arm randomized...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37925516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41853-4 |
_version_ | 1785131158792568832 |
---|---|
author | Tong, Jiayi Duan, Rui Li, Ruowang Luo, Chongliang Moore, Jason H. Zhu, Jingsan Foster, Gary D. Volpp, Kevin G. Yancy, William S. Shaw, Pamela A. Chen, Yong |
author_facet | Tong, Jiayi Duan, Rui Li, Ruowang Luo, Chongliang Moore, Jason H. Zhu, Jingsan Foster, Gary D. Volpp, Kevin G. Yancy, William S. Shaw, Pamela A. Chen, Yong |
author_sort | Tong, Jiayi |
collection | PubMed |
description | In response to the escalating global obesity crisis and its associated health and financial burdens, this paper presents a novel methodology for analyzing longitudinal weight loss data and assessing the effectiveness of financial incentives. Drawing from the Keep It Off trial—a three-arm randomized controlled study with 189 participants—we examined the potential impact of financial incentives on weight loss maintenance. Given that some participants choose not to weigh themselves because of small weight change or weight gains, which is a common phenomenon in many weight-loss studies, traditional methods, for example, the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) method tends to overestimate the effect size due to the assumption that data are missing completely at random. To address this challenge, we proposed a framework which can identify evidence of missing not at random and conduct bias correction using the estimating equation derived from pairwise composite likelihood. By analyzing the Keep It Off data, we found that the data in this trial are most likely characterized by non-random missingness. Notably, we also found that the enrollment time (i.e., duration time) would be positively associated with the weight loss maintenance after adjusting for the baseline participant characteristics (e.g., age, sex). Moreover, the lottery-based intervention was found to be more effective in weight loss maintenance compared with the direct payment intervention, though the difference was non-statistically significant. This framework's significance extends beyond weight loss research, offering a semi-parametric approach to assess missing data mechanisms and robustly explore associations between exposures (e.g., financial incentives) and key outcomes (e.g., weight loss maintenance). In essence, the proposed methodology provides a powerful toolkit for analyzing real-world longitudinal data, particularly in scenarios with data missing not at random, enriching comprehension of intricate dataset dynamics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10625563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106255632023-11-06 Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions Tong, Jiayi Duan, Rui Li, Ruowang Luo, Chongliang Moore, Jason H. Zhu, Jingsan Foster, Gary D. Volpp, Kevin G. Yancy, William S. Shaw, Pamela A. Chen, Yong Sci Rep Article In response to the escalating global obesity crisis and its associated health and financial burdens, this paper presents a novel methodology for analyzing longitudinal weight loss data and assessing the effectiveness of financial incentives. Drawing from the Keep It Off trial—a three-arm randomized controlled study with 189 participants—we examined the potential impact of financial incentives on weight loss maintenance. Given that some participants choose not to weigh themselves because of small weight change or weight gains, which is a common phenomenon in many weight-loss studies, traditional methods, for example, the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) method tends to overestimate the effect size due to the assumption that data are missing completely at random. To address this challenge, we proposed a framework which can identify evidence of missing not at random and conduct bias correction using the estimating equation derived from pairwise composite likelihood. By analyzing the Keep It Off data, we found that the data in this trial are most likely characterized by non-random missingness. Notably, we also found that the enrollment time (i.e., duration time) would be positively associated with the weight loss maintenance after adjusting for the baseline participant characteristics (e.g., age, sex). Moreover, the lottery-based intervention was found to be more effective in weight loss maintenance compared with the direct payment intervention, though the difference was non-statistically significant. This framework's significance extends beyond weight loss research, offering a semi-parametric approach to assess missing data mechanisms and robustly explore associations between exposures (e.g., financial incentives) and key outcomes (e.g., weight loss maintenance). In essence, the proposed methodology provides a powerful toolkit for analyzing real-world longitudinal data, particularly in scenarios with data missing not at random, enriching comprehension of intricate dataset dynamics. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10625563/ /pubmed/37925516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41853-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Tong, Jiayi Duan, Rui Li, Ruowang Luo, Chongliang Moore, Jason H. Zhu, Jingsan Foster, Gary D. Volpp, Kevin G. Yancy, William S. Shaw, Pamela A. Chen, Yong Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions |
title | Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions |
title_full | Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions |
title_fullStr | Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions |
title_short | Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions |
title_sort | quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37925516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41853-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tongjiayi quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions AT duanrui quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions AT liruowang quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions AT luochongliang quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions AT moorejasonh quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions AT zhujingsan quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions AT fostergaryd quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions AT volppkeving quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions AT yancywilliams quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions AT shawpamelaa quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions AT chenyong quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions |