Cargando…

Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions

In response to the escalating global obesity crisis and its associated health and financial burdens, this paper presents a novel methodology for analyzing longitudinal weight loss data and assessing the effectiveness of financial incentives. Drawing from the Keep It Off trial—a three-arm randomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tong, Jiayi, Duan, Rui, Li, Ruowang, Luo, Chongliang, Moore, Jason H., Zhu, Jingsan, Foster, Gary D., Volpp, Kevin G., Yancy, William S., Shaw, Pamela A., Chen, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37925516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41853-4
_version_ 1785131158792568832
author Tong, Jiayi
Duan, Rui
Li, Ruowang
Luo, Chongliang
Moore, Jason H.
Zhu, Jingsan
Foster, Gary D.
Volpp, Kevin G.
Yancy, William S.
Shaw, Pamela A.
Chen, Yong
author_facet Tong, Jiayi
Duan, Rui
Li, Ruowang
Luo, Chongliang
Moore, Jason H.
Zhu, Jingsan
Foster, Gary D.
Volpp, Kevin G.
Yancy, William S.
Shaw, Pamela A.
Chen, Yong
author_sort Tong, Jiayi
collection PubMed
description In response to the escalating global obesity crisis and its associated health and financial burdens, this paper presents a novel methodology for analyzing longitudinal weight loss data and assessing the effectiveness of financial incentives. Drawing from the Keep It Off trial—a three-arm randomized controlled study with 189 participants—we examined the potential impact of financial incentives on weight loss maintenance. Given that some participants choose not to weigh themselves because of small weight change or weight gains, which is a common phenomenon in many weight-loss studies, traditional methods, for example, the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) method tends to overestimate the effect size due to the assumption that data are missing completely at random. To address this challenge, we proposed a framework which can identify evidence of missing not at random and conduct bias correction using the estimating equation derived from pairwise composite likelihood. By analyzing the Keep It Off data, we found that the data in this trial are most likely characterized by non-random missingness. Notably, we also found that the enrollment time (i.e., duration time) would be positively associated with the weight loss maintenance after adjusting for the baseline participant characteristics (e.g., age, sex). Moreover, the lottery-based intervention was found to be more effective in weight loss maintenance compared with the direct payment intervention, though the difference was non-statistically significant. This framework's significance extends beyond weight loss research, offering a semi-parametric approach to assess missing data mechanisms and robustly explore associations between exposures (e.g., financial incentives) and key outcomes (e.g., weight loss maintenance). In essence, the proposed methodology provides a powerful toolkit for analyzing real-world longitudinal data, particularly in scenarios with data missing not at random, enriching comprehension of intricate dataset dynamics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10625563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106255632023-11-06 Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions Tong, Jiayi Duan, Rui Li, Ruowang Luo, Chongliang Moore, Jason H. Zhu, Jingsan Foster, Gary D. Volpp, Kevin G. Yancy, William S. Shaw, Pamela A. Chen, Yong Sci Rep Article In response to the escalating global obesity crisis and its associated health and financial burdens, this paper presents a novel methodology for analyzing longitudinal weight loss data and assessing the effectiveness of financial incentives. Drawing from the Keep It Off trial—a three-arm randomized controlled study with 189 participants—we examined the potential impact of financial incentives on weight loss maintenance. Given that some participants choose not to weigh themselves because of small weight change or weight gains, which is a common phenomenon in many weight-loss studies, traditional methods, for example, the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) method tends to overestimate the effect size due to the assumption that data are missing completely at random. To address this challenge, we proposed a framework which can identify evidence of missing not at random and conduct bias correction using the estimating equation derived from pairwise composite likelihood. By analyzing the Keep It Off data, we found that the data in this trial are most likely characterized by non-random missingness. Notably, we also found that the enrollment time (i.e., duration time) would be positively associated with the weight loss maintenance after adjusting for the baseline participant characteristics (e.g., age, sex). Moreover, the lottery-based intervention was found to be more effective in weight loss maintenance compared with the direct payment intervention, though the difference was non-statistically significant. This framework's significance extends beyond weight loss research, offering a semi-parametric approach to assess missing data mechanisms and robustly explore associations between exposures (e.g., financial incentives) and key outcomes (e.g., weight loss maintenance). In essence, the proposed methodology provides a powerful toolkit for analyzing real-world longitudinal data, particularly in scenarios with data missing not at random, enriching comprehension of intricate dataset dynamics. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10625563/ /pubmed/37925516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41853-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Tong, Jiayi
Duan, Rui
Li, Ruowang
Luo, Chongliang
Moore, Jason H.
Zhu, Jingsan
Foster, Gary D.
Volpp, Kevin G.
Yancy, William S.
Shaw, Pamela A.
Chen, Yong
Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions
title Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions
title_full Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions
title_fullStr Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions
title_short Quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions
title_sort quantifying and correcting bias due to outcome dependent self-reported weights in longitudinal study of weight loss interventions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37925516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41853-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tongjiayi quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions
AT duanrui quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions
AT liruowang quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions
AT luochongliang quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions
AT moorejasonh quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions
AT zhujingsan quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions
AT fostergaryd quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions
AT volppkeving quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions
AT yancywilliams quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions
AT shawpamelaa quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions
AT chenyong quantifyingandcorrectingbiasduetooutcomedependentselfreportedweightsinlongitudinalstudyofweightlossinterventions