Cargando…
Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the users of the head and neck cancer (HNC) online support group (OSG) and describe the perceived benefits of membership. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional. SETTING: Online. METHODS: An administered survey with questions asking about demographics, cancer history, treatment cho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37933274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.87 |
_version_ | 1785131180593512448 |
---|---|
author | Tam, Benjamin Lin, Matthew Castellanos, Carlos Ulloa, Ruben Kokot, Niels Hur, Kevin |
author_facet | Tam, Benjamin Lin, Matthew Castellanos, Carlos Ulloa, Ruben Kokot, Niels Hur, Kevin |
author_sort | Tam, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To characterize the users of the head and neck cancer (HNC) online support group (OSG) and describe the perceived benefits of membership. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional. SETTING: Online. METHODS: An administered survey with questions asking about demographics, cancer history, treatment choices, and feelings about OSGs was posted on the 5 largest HNC OSGs on Facebook. RESULTS: A total of 97 participants completed the survey. Mean age was 57.8 years old (standard deviation = 10.7 years). Most participants were female (50.5%) and Caucasian (92.8%). This cohort was well educated with 65.5% holding at least a college degree. Annual income was high with 41.8% reporting annual income of $100,000 or greater. The most common treatment modality was radiation (88.7%). The most common surgery was neck dissection (46.4%). Most participants preferred OSGs (70.8%) over other support group types. OSGs were heavily utilized with our cohort reporting using the OSG at least several times a week (80.0%). The top reasons for joining the OSG were sharing one's experience of HNC (76.3%) and gaining support from others with HNC (85.6%). OSGs were ranked as the #3 source of medical information for HNC behind otolaryngologists and oncologists. Membership in a HNC OSG had a minimal impact on decision‐making. CONCLUSION: HNC OSGs appear to provide a beneficial community for HNC patients. Otolaryngologists should consider incorporating HNC OSG as a possible supplemental resource for their HNC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10625668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106256682023-11-06 Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients Tam, Benjamin Lin, Matthew Castellanos, Carlos Ulloa, Ruben Kokot, Niels Hur, Kevin OTO Open Original Research OBJECTIVE: To characterize the users of the head and neck cancer (HNC) online support group (OSG) and describe the perceived benefits of membership. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional. SETTING: Online. METHODS: An administered survey with questions asking about demographics, cancer history, treatment choices, and feelings about OSGs was posted on the 5 largest HNC OSGs on Facebook. RESULTS: A total of 97 participants completed the survey. Mean age was 57.8 years old (standard deviation = 10.7 years). Most participants were female (50.5%) and Caucasian (92.8%). This cohort was well educated with 65.5% holding at least a college degree. Annual income was high with 41.8% reporting annual income of $100,000 or greater. The most common treatment modality was radiation (88.7%). The most common surgery was neck dissection (46.4%). Most participants preferred OSGs (70.8%) over other support group types. OSGs were heavily utilized with our cohort reporting using the OSG at least several times a week (80.0%). The top reasons for joining the OSG were sharing one's experience of HNC (76.3%) and gaining support from others with HNC (85.6%). OSGs were ranked as the #3 source of medical information for HNC behind otolaryngologists and oncologists. Membership in a HNC OSG had a minimal impact on decision‐making. CONCLUSION: HNC OSGs appear to provide a beneficial community for HNC patients. Otolaryngologists should consider incorporating HNC OSG as a possible supplemental resource for their HNC patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10625668/ /pubmed/37933274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.87 Text en © 2023 The Authors. OTO Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tam, Benjamin Lin, Matthew Castellanos, Carlos Ulloa, Ruben Kokot, Niels Hur, Kevin Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients |
title | Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients |
title_full | Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients |
title_fullStr | Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients |
title_short | Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients |
title_sort | head and neck cancer online support groups: disparities in participation and impact on patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37933274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.87 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tambenjamin headandneckcanceronlinesupportgroupsdisparitiesinparticipationandimpactonpatients AT linmatthew headandneckcanceronlinesupportgroupsdisparitiesinparticipationandimpactonpatients AT castellanoscarlos headandneckcanceronlinesupportgroupsdisparitiesinparticipationandimpactonpatients AT ulloaruben headandneckcanceronlinesupportgroupsdisparitiesinparticipationandimpactonpatients AT kokotniels headandneckcanceronlinesupportgroupsdisparitiesinparticipationandimpactonpatients AT hurkevin headandneckcanceronlinesupportgroupsdisparitiesinparticipationandimpactonpatients |