Cargando…

Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the users of the head and neck cancer (HNC) online support group (OSG) and describe the perceived benefits of membership. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional. SETTING: Online. METHODS: An administered survey with questions asking about demographics, cancer history, treatment cho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tam, Benjamin, Lin, Matthew, Castellanos, Carlos, Ulloa, Ruben, Kokot, Niels, Hur, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37933274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.87
_version_ 1785131180593512448
author Tam, Benjamin
Lin, Matthew
Castellanos, Carlos
Ulloa, Ruben
Kokot, Niels
Hur, Kevin
author_facet Tam, Benjamin
Lin, Matthew
Castellanos, Carlos
Ulloa, Ruben
Kokot, Niels
Hur, Kevin
author_sort Tam, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To characterize the users of the head and neck cancer (HNC) online support group (OSG) and describe the perceived benefits of membership. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional. SETTING: Online. METHODS: An administered survey with questions asking about demographics, cancer history, treatment choices, and feelings about OSGs was posted on the 5 largest HNC OSGs on Facebook. RESULTS: A total of 97 participants completed the survey. Mean age was 57.8 years old (standard deviation = 10.7 years). Most participants were female (50.5%) and Caucasian (92.8%). This cohort was well educated with 65.5% holding at least a college degree. Annual income was high with 41.8% reporting annual income of $100,000 or greater. The most common treatment modality was radiation (88.7%). The most common surgery was neck dissection (46.4%). Most participants preferred OSGs (70.8%) over other support group types. OSGs were heavily utilized with our cohort reporting using the OSG at least several times a week (80.0%). The top reasons for joining the OSG were sharing one's experience of HNC (76.3%) and gaining support from others with HNC (85.6%). OSGs were ranked as the #3 source of medical information for HNC behind otolaryngologists and oncologists. Membership in a HNC OSG had a minimal impact on decision‐making. CONCLUSION: HNC OSGs appear to provide a beneficial community for HNC patients. Otolaryngologists should consider incorporating HNC OSG as a possible supplemental resource for their HNC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10625668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106256682023-11-06 Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients Tam, Benjamin Lin, Matthew Castellanos, Carlos Ulloa, Ruben Kokot, Niels Hur, Kevin OTO Open Original Research OBJECTIVE: To characterize the users of the head and neck cancer (HNC) online support group (OSG) and describe the perceived benefits of membership. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional. SETTING: Online. METHODS: An administered survey with questions asking about demographics, cancer history, treatment choices, and feelings about OSGs was posted on the 5 largest HNC OSGs on Facebook. RESULTS: A total of 97 participants completed the survey. Mean age was 57.8 years old (standard deviation = 10.7 years). Most participants were female (50.5%) and Caucasian (92.8%). This cohort was well educated with 65.5% holding at least a college degree. Annual income was high with 41.8% reporting annual income of $100,000 or greater. The most common treatment modality was radiation (88.7%). The most common surgery was neck dissection (46.4%). Most participants preferred OSGs (70.8%) over other support group types. OSGs were heavily utilized with our cohort reporting using the OSG at least several times a week (80.0%). The top reasons for joining the OSG were sharing one's experience of HNC (76.3%) and gaining support from others with HNC (85.6%). OSGs were ranked as the #3 source of medical information for HNC behind otolaryngologists and oncologists. Membership in a HNC OSG had a minimal impact on decision‐making. CONCLUSION: HNC OSGs appear to provide a beneficial community for HNC patients. Otolaryngologists should consider incorporating HNC OSG as a possible supplemental resource for their HNC patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10625668/ /pubmed/37933274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.87 Text en © 2023 The Authors. OTO Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tam, Benjamin
Lin, Matthew
Castellanos, Carlos
Ulloa, Ruben
Kokot, Niels
Hur, Kevin
Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients
title Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients
title_full Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients
title_fullStr Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients
title_full_unstemmed Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients
title_short Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients
title_sort head and neck cancer online support groups: disparities in participation and impact on patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37933274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.87
work_keys_str_mv AT tambenjamin headandneckcanceronlinesupportgroupsdisparitiesinparticipationandimpactonpatients
AT linmatthew headandneckcanceronlinesupportgroupsdisparitiesinparticipationandimpactonpatients
AT castellanoscarlos headandneckcanceronlinesupportgroupsdisparitiesinparticipationandimpactonpatients
AT ulloaruben headandneckcanceronlinesupportgroupsdisparitiesinparticipationandimpactonpatients
AT kokotniels headandneckcanceronlinesupportgroupsdisparitiesinparticipationandimpactonpatients
AT hurkevin headandneckcanceronlinesupportgroupsdisparitiesinparticipationandimpactonpatients