Cargando…
Three-dimensional assessment of Upper Airway in Class III patients with different facial patterns
BACKGROUND: To evaluate three-dimensionally the upper airway (UA) of class III adults with different facial patterns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted, in which cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images from a private clinic in Viña del Mar, Chile were evaluated. The sam...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37933396 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60856 |
_version_ | 1785131183374336000 |
---|---|
author | De Nordenflycht, Diego Corona, Tomás Figueroa, Alejandro |
author_facet | De Nordenflycht, Diego Corona, Tomás Figueroa, Alejandro |
author_sort | De Nordenflycht, Diego |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate three-dimensionally the upper airway (UA) of class III adults with different facial patterns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted, in which cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images from a private clinic in Viña del Mar, Chile were evaluated. The sample consisted of CBCT images of 59 skeletal class III subjects (33 females and 26 males, mean age 24.7 years) in which the vertical facial pattern was determined using the Vert index, and the minimum cross-sectional area and total volume of the UA were measured. The minimum cross-sectional area variable was analyzed by ANOVA and the total volume was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. Statistical analyses were performed with JASP 0.13.1 software at p=0.05. RESULTS: The sample included images of 21 brachyfacial, 14 mesofacial and 24 dolichofacial subjects. The mean minimum cross-sectional area of the sample was 591.78 mm2 +/- 149.38 mm2 (minimum=352.00 mm2; maximum=971.00 mm2), being greater in brachyfacial than in dolichofacial and mesofacial subjects, however, these differences were not significant (p=0.147). The mean total volume of the sample was 13.40 +/- 4.69 cm3 (minimum=7.16 cm3; maximum=25.66 cm3), being greater in brachyfacial than in dolichofacial and mesofacial subjects, however, these differences were not significant (p=0.353). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the limitations of the present study, the vertical facial pattern does not appear to significantly influence upper airway measurements in skeletal class III adults. Key words:Airway, cephalometry, cone-beam computed tomography, facial pattern, malocclusion, Angle class III. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10625683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106256832023-11-06 Three-dimensional assessment of Upper Airway in Class III patients with different facial patterns De Nordenflycht, Diego Corona, Tomás Figueroa, Alejandro J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate three-dimensionally the upper airway (UA) of class III adults with different facial patterns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted, in which cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images from a private clinic in Viña del Mar, Chile were evaluated. The sample consisted of CBCT images of 59 skeletal class III subjects (33 females and 26 males, mean age 24.7 years) in which the vertical facial pattern was determined using the Vert index, and the minimum cross-sectional area and total volume of the UA were measured. The minimum cross-sectional area variable was analyzed by ANOVA and the total volume was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. Statistical analyses were performed with JASP 0.13.1 software at p=0.05. RESULTS: The sample included images of 21 brachyfacial, 14 mesofacial and 24 dolichofacial subjects. The mean minimum cross-sectional area of the sample was 591.78 mm2 +/- 149.38 mm2 (minimum=352.00 mm2; maximum=971.00 mm2), being greater in brachyfacial than in dolichofacial and mesofacial subjects, however, these differences were not significant (p=0.147). The mean total volume of the sample was 13.40 +/- 4.69 cm3 (minimum=7.16 cm3; maximum=25.66 cm3), being greater in brachyfacial than in dolichofacial and mesofacial subjects, however, these differences were not significant (p=0.353). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the limitations of the present study, the vertical facial pattern does not appear to significantly influence upper airway measurements in skeletal class III adults. Key words:Airway, cephalometry, cone-beam computed tomography, facial pattern, malocclusion, Angle class III. Medicina Oral S.L. 2023-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10625683/ /pubmed/37933396 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60856 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research De Nordenflycht, Diego Corona, Tomás Figueroa, Alejandro Three-dimensional assessment of Upper Airway in Class III patients with different facial patterns |
title | Three-dimensional assessment of Upper Airway in Class III patients with different facial patterns |
title_full | Three-dimensional assessment of Upper Airway in Class III patients with different facial patterns |
title_fullStr | Three-dimensional assessment of Upper Airway in Class III patients with different facial patterns |
title_full_unstemmed | Three-dimensional assessment of Upper Airway in Class III patients with different facial patterns |
title_short | Three-dimensional assessment of Upper Airway in Class III patients with different facial patterns |
title_sort | three-dimensional assessment of upper airway in class iii patients with different facial patterns |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37933396 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60856 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT denordenflychtdiego threedimensionalassessmentofupperairwayinclassiiipatientswithdifferentfacialpatterns AT coronatomas threedimensionalassessmentofupperairwayinclassiiipatientswithdifferentfacialpatterns AT figueroaalejandro threedimensionalassessmentofupperairwayinclassiiipatientswithdifferentfacialpatterns |