Cargando…
Validating a multi-locus metabarcoding approach for characterizing mixed-pollen samples
BACKGROUND: The mutualistic interaction between entomophilous plants and pollinators is fundamental to the structure of most terrestrial ecosystems. The sensitive nature of this relationship has been disrupted by anthropogenic modifications to natural landscapes, warranting development of new method...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37925401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01097-9 |
_version_ | 1785131188160036864 |
---|---|
author | Wizenberg, Sydney B. Newburn, Laura R. Pepinelli, Mateus Conflitti, Ida M. Richardson, Rodney T. Hoover, Shelley E. R. Currie, Robert W. Giovenazzo, Pierre Zayed, Amro |
author_facet | Wizenberg, Sydney B. Newburn, Laura R. Pepinelli, Mateus Conflitti, Ida M. Richardson, Rodney T. Hoover, Shelley E. R. Currie, Robert W. Giovenazzo, Pierre Zayed, Amro |
author_sort | Wizenberg, Sydney B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The mutualistic interaction between entomophilous plants and pollinators is fundamental to the structure of most terrestrial ecosystems. The sensitive nature of this relationship has been disrupted by anthropogenic modifications to natural landscapes, warranting development of new methods for exploring this trophic interaction. Characterizing the composition of pollen collected by pollinators, e.g. Apis mellifera, is a common means of exploring this relationship, but traditional methods of microscopic pollen assessment are laborious and limited in their scope. The development of pollen metabarcoding as a method of rapidly characterizing the abundance and diversity of pollen within mixed samples presents a new frontier for this type of work, but metabarcoding may have limitations, and validation is warranted before any suite of primers can be confidently used in a research program. We set out to evaluate the utility of an integrative approach, using a set of established primers (ITS2 and rbcL) versus melissopalynological analysis for characterizing 27 mixed-pollen samples from agricultural sites across Canada. RESULTS: Both individual markers performed well relative to melissopalynology at the family level with decreases in the strength of correlation and linear model fits at the genus level. Integrating data from both markers together via a multi-locus approach provided the best rank-based correlation between metagenetic and melissopalynological data at both the genus (ρ = 0.659; p < 0.001) and family level (ρ = 0.830; p < 0.001). Species accumulation curves indicated that, after controlling for sampling effort, melissopalynological characterization provides similar or higher species richness estimates than either marker. The higher number of plant species discovered via the metabarcoding approach simply reflects the vastly greater sampling effort in comparison to melissopalynology. CONCLUSIONS: Pollen metabarcoding performed well at characterizing the composition of mixed pollen samples relative to a traditional melissopalynological approach. Limitations to the quantitative application of this method can be addressed by adopting a multi-locus approach that integrates information from multiple markers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13007-023-01097-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10625703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106257032023-11-06 Validating a multi-locus metabarcoding approach for characterizing mixed-pollen samples Wizenberg, Sydney B. Newburn, Laura R. Pepinelli, Mateus Conflitti, Ida M. Richardson, Rodney T. Hoover, Shelley E. R. Currie, Robert W. Giovenazzo, Pierre Zayed, Amro Plant Methods Methodology BACKGROUND: The mutualistic interaction between entomophilous plants and pollinators is fundamental to the structure of most terrestrial ecosystems. The sensitive nature of this relationship has been disrupted by anthropogenic modifications to natural landscapes, warranting development of new methods for exploring this trophic interaction. Characterizing the composition of pollen collected by pollinators, e.g. Apis mellifera, is a common means of exploring this relationship, but traditional methods of microscopic pollen assessment are laborious and limited in their scope. The development of pollen metabarcoding as a method of rapidly characterizing the abundance and diversity of pollen within mixed samples presents a new frontier for this type of work, but metabarcoding may have limitations, and validation is warranted before any suite of primers can be confidently used in a research program. We set out to evaluate the utility of an integrative approach, using a set of established primers (ITS2 and rbcL) versus melissopalynological analysis for characterizing 27 mixed-pollen samples from agricultural sites across Canada. RESULTS: Both individual markers performed well relative to melissopalynology at the family level with decreases in the strength of correlation and linear model fits at the genus level. Integrating data from both markers together via a multi-locus approach provided the best rank-based correlation between metagenetic and melissopalynological data at both the genus (ρ = 0.659; p < 0.001) and family level (ρ = 0.830; p < 0.001). Species accumulation curves indicated that, after controlling for sampling effort, melissopalynological characterization provides similar or higher species richness estimates than either marker. The higher number of plant species discovered via the metabarcoding approach simply reflects the vastly greater sampling effort in comparison to melissopalynology. CONCLUSIONS: Pollen metabarcoding performed well at characterizing the composition of mixed pollen samples relative to a traditional melissopalynological approach. Limitations to the quantitative application of this method can be addressed by adopting a multi-locus approach that integrates information from multiple markers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13007-023-01097-9. BioMed Central 2023-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10625703/ /pubmed/37925401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01097-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Wizenberg, Sydney B. Newburn, Laura R. Pepinelli, Mateus Conflitti, Ida M. Richardson, Rodney T. Hoover, Shelley E. R. Currie, Robert W. Giovenazzo, Pierre Zayed, Amro Validating a multi-locus metabarcoding approach for characterizing mixed-pollen samples |
title | Validating a multi-locus metabarcoding approach for characterizing mixed-pollen samples |
title_full | Validating a multi-locus metabarcoding approach for characterizing mixed-pollen samples |
title_fullStr | Validating a multi-locus metabarcoding approach for characterizing mixed-pollen samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Validating a multi-locus metabarcoding approach for characterizing mixed-pollen samples |
title_short | Validating a multi-locus metabarcoding approach for characterizing mixed-pollen samples |
title_sort | validating a multi-locus metabarcoding approach for characterizing mixed-pollen samples |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37925401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01097-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wizenbergsydneyb validatingamultilocusmetabarcodingapproachforcharacterizingmixedpollensamples AT newburnlaurar validatingamultilocusmetabarcodingapproachforcharacterizingmixedpollensamples AT pepinellimateus validatingamultilocusmetabarcodingapproachforcharacterizingmixedpollensamples AT conflittiidam validatingamultilocusmetabarcodingapproachforcharacterizingmixedpollensamples AT richardsonrodneyt validatingamultilocusmetabarcodingapproachforcharacterizingmixedpollensamples AT hoovershelleyer validatingamultilocusmetabarcodingapproachforcharacterizingmixedpollensamples AT currierobertw validatingamultilocusmetabarcodingapproachforcharacterizingmixedpollensamples AT giovenazzopierre validatingamultilocusmetabarcodingapproachforcharacterizingmixedpollensamples AT zayedamro validatingamultilocusmetabarcodingapproachforcharacterizingmixedpollensamples |