Cargando…
Myopic (Peri)papillary Changes and Visual Field Defects
PURPOSE: Myopic eyes combining gamma peripapillary atrophy and peripapillary staphyloma were sorted according to the presence of intrachoroidal cavitation (PICCs) or its absence (combinations). Visual field defects (VFDs) and factors discriminating these groups were analyzed. METHODS: These groups w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37933329 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S404167 |
_version_ | 1785131198334369792 |
---|---|
author | Ehongo, Adèle Dugauquier, Artémise Kisma, Nacima De Maertelaer, Viviane Nana Wandji, Brenda Tchatchou Tomy, Wilfried Alaoui Mhammedi, Yassir Coppens, Kevin Leroy, Karelle Bremer, Francoise |
author_facet | Ehongo, Adèle Dugauquier, Artémise Kisma, Nacima De Maertelaer, Viviane Nana Wandji, Brenda Tchatchou Tomy, Wilfried Alaoui Mhammedi, Yassir Coppens, Kevin Leroy, Karelle Bremer, Francoise |
author_sort | Ehongo, Adèle |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Myopic eyes combining gamma peripapillary atrophy and peripapillary staphyloma were sorted according to the presence of intrachoroidal cavitation (PICCs) or its absence (combinations). Visual field defects (VFDs) and factors discriminating these groups were analyzed. METHODS: These groups were sorted by optical coherence tomography. VFDs were assessed using the Humphrey(®) Field Analyzer 3, SITA standard. Ovality index (OI) was the ratio between the shortest and longest diameters of the disc. The proportions of PICCs, lamina cribrosa defects (LCDs) and clusters in each Garway-Heath’s sector (A—F) were analyzed. All variables were compared between PICCs and combinations. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed ultimately. RESULTS: Of the 93 eyes, we obtained, 20 PICCs and 73 combinations. The prevalence of VFDs and LCDs in PICCs were 65% (13/20) and 30% (6/20), respectively. PICCs 85% (17/20) and LCDs 12% (11/93) predominated in sector B (inferotemporal) and clusters 9.7% (9/93) in the corresponding sector. The proportion of VFDs was significantly higher in PICCs than combinations (p < 0.001). In sector B, the proportion of LCDs was significantly higher in PICCs than combinations (p = 0.011). The mean OI was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in PICCs than combinations. Multivariate logistic regression analysis concluded that mean OI (p < 0.001) was the only statistically significant factor discriminating PICCs and combinations. CONCLUSION: Mean OI discriminating PICCs from combinations is further evidence of a gradation of structural changes between them. It could be related to the higher proportion of VFDs in PICCs. The predominant distribution of PICCs infero-temporally supports PICC as a cause of uncertainty in glaucoma diagnosis in high myopia. Furthermore, the highest proportion of PICCs and LCDs in this sector highlights its vulnerability to damage in myopic eyes and deserves further investigation as it is also primarily involved in glaucoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10625749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106257492023-11-06 Myopic (Peri)papillary Changes and Visual Field Defects Ehongo, Adèle Dugauquier, Artémise Kisma, Nacima De Maertelaer, Viviane Nana Wandji, Brenda Tchatchou Tomy, Wilfried Alaoui Mhammedi, Yassir Coppens, Kevin Leroy, Karelle Bremer, Francoise Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Myopic eyes combining gamma peripapillary atrophy and peripapillary staphyloma were sorted according to the presence of intrachoroidal cavitation (PICCs) or its absence (combinations). Visual field defects (VFDs) and factors discriminating these groups were analyzed. METHODS: These groups were sorted by optical coherence tomography. VFDs were assessed using the Humphrey(®) Field Analyzer 3, SITA standard. Ovality index (OI) was the ratio between the shortest and longest diameters of the disc. The proportions of PICCs, lamina cribrosa defects (LCDs) and clusters in each Garway-Heath’s sector (A—F) were analyzed. All variables were compared between PICCs and combinations. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed ultimately. RESULTS: Of the 93 eyes, we obtained, 20 PICCs and 73 combinations. The prevalence of VFDs and LCDs in PICCs were 65% (13/20) and 30% (6/20), respectively. PICCs 85% (17/20) and LCDs 12% (11/93) predominated in sector B (inferotemporal) and clusters 9.7% (9/93) in the corresponding sector. The proportion of VFDs was significantly higher in PICCs than combinations (p < 0.001). In sector B, the proportion of LCDs was significantly higher in PICCs than combinations (p = 0.011). The mean OI was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in PICCs than combinations. Multivariate logistic regression analysis concluded that mean OI (p < 0.001) was the only statistically significant factor discriminating PICCs and combinations. CONCLUSION: Mean OI discriminating PICCs from combinations is further evidence of a gradation of structural changes between them. It could be related to the higher proportion of VFDs in PICCs. The predominant distribution of PICCs infero-temporally supports PICC as a cause of uncertainty in glaucoma diagnosis in high myopia. Furthermore, the highest proportion of PICCs and LCDs in this sector highlights its vulnerability to damage in myopic eyes and deserves further investigation as it is also primarily involved in glaucoma. Dove 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10625749/ /pubmed/37933329 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S404167 Text en © 2023 Ehongo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ehongo, Adèle Dugauquier, Artémise Kisma, Nacima De Maertelaer, Viviane Nana Wandji, Brenda Tchatchou Tomy, Wilfried Alaoui Mhammedi, Yassir Coppens, Kevin Leroy, Karelle Bremer, Francoise Myopic (Peri)papillary Changes and Visual Field Defects |
title | Myopic (Peri)papillary Changes and Visual Field Defects |
title_full | Myopic (Peri)papillary Changes and Visual Field Defects |
title_fullStr | Myopic (Peri)papillary Changes and Visual Field Defects |
title_full_unstemmed | Myopic (Peri)papillary Changes and Visual Field Defects |
title_short | Myopic (Peri)papillary Changes and Visual Field Defects |
title_sort | myopic (peri)papillary changes and visual field defects |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10625749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37933329 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S404167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ehongoadele myopicperipapillarychangesandvisualfielddefects AT dugauquierartemise myopicperipapillarychangesandvisualfielddefects AT kismanacima myopicperipapillarychangesandvisualfielddefects AT demaertelaerviviane myopicperipapillarychangesandvisualfielddefects AT nanawandjibrenda myopicperipapillarychangesandvisualfielddefects AT tchatchoutomywilfried myopicperipapillarychangesandvisualfielddefects AT alaouimhammediyassir myopicperipapillarychangesandvisualfielddefects AT coppenskevin myopicperipapillarychangesandvisualfielddefects AT leroykarelle myopicperipapillarychangesandvisualfielddefects AT bremerfrancoise myopicperipapillarychangesandvisualfielddefects |