Cargando…

ECGI targeted ablation for persistent AF not responding to pulmonary vein isolation: Results of a two-staged strategy (TARGET AF2)

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms sustaining persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: The study sought to evaluate both the clinical outcomes and response to ablation of potential drivers in patients with recurrent persistent AF recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhillon, Gurpreet, Honarbakhsh, Shohreh, Abbas, Hakam, Waddingham, Peter, Dennis, Adam S., Ahluwalia, Nikhil, Finlay, Malcolm, Sohaib, Afzal, Welch, Sophie, Daw, Holly, Sporton, Simon, Chow, Anthony, Earley, Mark J., Lambiase, Pier D., Hunter, Ross J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.08.004
_version_ 1785131289369640960
author Dhillon, Gurpreet
Honarbakhsh, Shohreh
Abbas, Hakam
Waddingham, Peter
Dennis, Adam S.
Ahluwalia, Nikhil
Finlay, Malcolm
Sohaib, Afzal
Welch, Sophie
Daw, Holly
Sporton, Simon
Chow, Anthony
Earley, Mark J.
Lambiase, Pier D.
Hunter, Ross J.
author_facet Dhillon, Gurpreet
Honarbakhsh, Shohreh
Abbas, Hakam
Waddingham, Peter
Dennis, Adam S.
Ahluwalia, Nikhil
Finlay, Malcolm
Sohaib, Afzal
Welch, Sophie
Daw, Holly
Sporton, Simon
Chow, Anthony
Earley, Mark J.
Lambiase, Pier D.
Hunter, Ross J.
author_sort Dhillon, Gurpreet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mechanisms sustaining persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: The study sought to evaluate both the clinical outcomes and response to ablation of potential drivers in patients with recurrent persistent AF recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS: A total of 100 patients with persistent AF of <2 years’ duration underwent cryoballoon PVI (ECGI phenotyping of persistent AF based on driver burden and distribution to predict response to pulmonary vein isolation). Patients with documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmia within 12 months were recruited and underwent repeat PVI (if needed) followed by ablation of potential drivers (PDs) identified by electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI). PDs were defined as rotational activity >1.5 revolutions or focal activations. Cycle lengths were measured pre- and postablation. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year as per guidelines. RESULTS: Of 37 patients recruited, 26 had recurrent AF and underwent ECGI-guided ablation of PDs. An average of 6.4 ± 2.7 PDs were targeted per patient. The mean ablation time targeting PDs was 15.5 ± 6.9 minutes. An ablation response occurred in 20 patients (AF termination in 6, cycle length prolongation ≥10% in 14). At 1 year, 14 (54%) of 26 patients were free from arrhythmia, and 12 (46%) of 26 were off antiarrhythmic drugs. Considering the 96 patients who completed follow-up out of the original cohort of 100 patients undergoing cryoablation in this staged strategy, freedom from arrhythmia at 1 year following the last procedure was 72 (75%) of 96, or 70 (73%) of 96 off antiarrhythmic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent AF despite PVI, ECGI-guided ablation caused an acute response in a majority with reasonable long-term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10626178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106261782023-11-07 ECGI targeted ablation for persistent AF not responding to pulmonary vein isolation: Results of a two-staged strategy (TARGET AF2) Dhillon, Gurpreet Honarbakhsh, Shohreh Abbas, Hakam Waddingham, Peter Dennis, Adam S. Ahluwalia, Nikhil Finlay, Malcolm Sohaib, Afzal Welch, Sophie Daw, Holly Sporton, Simon Chow, Anthony Earley, Mark J. Lambiase, Pier D. Hunter, Ross J. Heart Rhythm O2 Clinical BACKGROUND: Mechanisms sustaining persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: The study sought to evaluate both the clinical outcomes and response to ablation of potential drivers in patients with recurrent persistent AF recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS: A total of 100 patients with persistent AF of <2 years’ duration underwent cryoballoon PVI (ECGI phenotyping of persistent AF based on driver burden and distribution to predict response to pulmonary vein isolation). Patients with documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmia within 12 months were recruited and underwent repeat PVI (if needed) followed by ablation of potential drivers (PDs) identified by electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI). PDs were defined as rotational activity >1.5 revolutions or focal activations. Cycle lengths were measured pre- and postablation. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year as per guidelines. RESULTS: Of 37 patients recruited, 26 had recurrent AF and underwent ECGI-guided ablation of PDs. An average of 6.4 ± 2.7 PDs were targeted per patient. The mean ablation time targeting PDs was 15.5 ± 6.9 minutes. An ablation response occurred in 20 patients (AF termination in 6, cycle length prolongation ≥10% in 14). At 1 year, 14 (54%) of 26 patients were free from arrhythmia, and 12 (46%) of 26 were off antiarrhythmic drugs. Considering the 96 patients who completed follow-up out of the original cohort of 100 patients undergoing cryoablation in this staged strategy, freedom from arrhythmia at 1 year following the last procedure was 72 (75%) of 96, or 70 (73%) of 96 off antiarrhythmic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent AF despite PVI, ECGI-guided ablation caused an acute response in a majority with reasonable long-term outcomes. Elsevier 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10626178/ /pubmed/37936670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.08.004 Text en © 2023 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical
Dhillon, Gurpreet
Honarbakhsh, Shohreh
Abbas, Hakam
Waddingham, Peter
Dennis, Adam S.
Ahluwalia, Nikhil
Finlay, Malcolm
Sohaib, Afzal
Welch, Sophie
Daw, Holly
Sporton, Simon
Chow, Anthony
Earley, Mark J.
Lambiase, Pier D.
Hunter, Ross J.
ECGI targeted ablation for persistent AF not responding to pulmonary vein isolation: Results of a two-staged strategy (TARGET AF2)
title ECGI targeted ablation for persistent AF not responding to pulmonary vein isolation: Results of a two-staged strategy (TARGET AF2)
title_full ECGI targeted ablation for persistent AF not responding to pulmonary vein isolation: Results of a two-staged strategy (TARGET AF2)
title_fullStr ECGI targeted ablation for persistent AF not responding to pulmonary vein isolation: Results of a two-staged strategy (TARGET AF2)
title_full_unstemmed ECGI targeted ablation for persistent AF not responding to pulmonary vein isolation: Results of a two-staged strategy (TARGET AF2)
title_short ECGI targeted ablation for persistent AF not responding to pulmonary vein isolation: Results of a two-staged strategy (TARGET AF2)
title_sort ecgi targeted ablation for persistent af not responding to pulmonary vein isolation: results of a two-staged strategy (target af2)
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.08.004
work_keys_str_mv AT dhillongurpreet ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT honarbakhshshohreh ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT abbashakam ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT waddinghampeter ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT dennisadams ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT ahluwalianikhil ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT finlaymalcolm ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT sohaibafzal ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT welchsophie ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT dawholly ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT sportonsimon ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT chowanthony ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT earleymarkj ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT lambiasepierd ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2
AT hunterrossj ecgitargetedablationforpersistentafnotrespondingtopulmonaryveinisolationresultsofatwostagedstrategytargetaf2