Cargando…

PCSK-9 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been approved to treat dyslipidaemia. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the most efficient PCSK9 therapies that target PCSK9 for secondary prevention in subjects at high risk for cardiovascular (CV) events. Thus, this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bodapati, Adi prasad, Hanif, Ayesha, Okafor, Donatus K, Katyal, Gitika, Kaur, Gursharan, Ashraf, Hafsa, Khan, Safeera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937036
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46605
_version_ 1785131299317481472
author Bodapati, Adi prasad
Hanif, Ayesha
Okafor, Donatus K
Katyal, Gitika
Kaur, Gursharan
Ashraf, Hafsa
Khan, Safeera
author_facet Bodapati, Adi prasad
Hanif, Ayesha
Okafor, Donatus K
Katyal, Gitika
Kaur, Gursharan
Ashraf, Hafsa
Khan, Safeera
author_sort Bodapati, Adi prasad
collection PubMed
description Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been approved to treat dyslipidaemia. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the most efficient PCSK9 therapies that target PCSK9 for secondary prevention in subjects at high risk for cardiovascular (CV) events. Thus, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-PCSK9 antibodies in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A comprehensive review of the available literature was done to identify RCTs that compared the use of PCSK9 inhibitors coupled with placebo or ezetimibe for the secondary prevention of CV events in patients on statin-background therapy. All-cause mortality was the major efficacy endpoint, while severe adverse events were the key safety outcome. A random effects model was used, and data were presented as risk ratio (RR) or risk difference with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The heterogeneity of the publications was determined using Cochran’s Q test, and publication bias was visually examined using funnel plots. All the chosen studies’ quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Checklists for Studies created by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Forty-one studies (76,304 patients: 49,086 on evolocumab, and 27,218 on alirocumab) were included, and their years of publication spanned from 2010 to 2023. Overall, no significant differences were observed in CV and all-cause mortality between PCSK9 inhibitors and controls. However, alirocumab use was linked to a reduced risk of all-cause death compared to control, but not evolocumab. Each of the drugs, evolocumab and alirocumab, significantly reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke. In comparison to the control therapy, the risk of major detrimental sequelae was significantly reduced by alirocumab therapy in the subgroup analysis of each PCSK9 inhibitor, whereas evolocumab treatment did not demonstrate significant differences (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.72-1.04; evolocumab: RR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.87-1.11). Both evolocumab and alirocumab are well-tolerated, safe medications that significantly lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10626223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106262232023-11-07 PCSK-9 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis Bodapati, Adi prasad Hanif, Ayesha Okafor, Donatus K Katyal, Gitika Kaur, Gursharan Ashraf, Hafsa Khan, Safeera Cureus Internal Medicine Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been approved to treat dyslipidaemia. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the most efficient PCSK9 therapies that target PCSK9 for secondary prevention in subjects at high risk for cardiovascular (CV) events. Thus, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-PCSK9 antibodies in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A comprehensive review of the available literature was done to identify RCTs that compared the use of PCSK9 inhibitors coupled with placebo or ezetimibe for the secondary prevention of CV events in patients on statin-background therapy. All-cause mortality was the major efficacy endpoint, while severe adverse events were the key safety outcome. A random effects model was used, and data were presented as risk ratio (RR) or risk difference with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The heterogeneity of the publications was determined using Cochran’s Q test, and publication bias was visually examined using funnel plots. All the chosen studies’ quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Checklists for Studies created by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Forty-one studies (76,304 patients: 49,086 on evolocumab, and 27,218 on alirocumab) were included, and their years of publication spanned from 2010 to 2023. Overall, no significant differences were observed in CV and all-cause mortality between PCSK9 inhibitors and controls. However, alirocumab use was linked to a reduced risk of all-cause death compared to control, but not evolocumab. Each of the drugs, evolocumab and alirocumab, significantly reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke. In comparison to the control therapy, the risk of major detrimental sequelae was significantly reduced by alirocumab therapy in the subgroup analysis of each PCSK9 inhibitor, whereas evolocumab treatment did not demonstrate significant differences (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.72-1.04; evolocumab: RR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.87-1.11). Both evolocumab and alirocumab are well-tolerated, safe medications that significantly lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. Cureus 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10626223/ /pubmed/37937036 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46605 Text en Copyright © 2023, Bodapati et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Internal Medicine
Bodapati, Adi prasad
Hanif, Ayesha
Okafor, Donatus K
Katyal, Gitika
Kaur, Gursharan
Ashraf, Hafsa
Khan, Safeera
PCSK-9 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
title PCSK-9 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
title_full PCSK-9 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr PCSK-9 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed PCSK-9 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
title_short PCSK-9 Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
title_sort pcsk-9 inhibitors and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Internal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937036
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46605
work_keys_str_mv AT bodapatiadiprasad pcsk9inhibitorsandcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT hanifayesha pcsk9inhibitorsandcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT okafordonatusk pcsk9inhibitorsandcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT katyalgitika pcsk9inhibitorsandcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT kaurgursharan pcsk9inhibitorsandcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT ashrafhafsa pcsk9inhibitorsandcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT khansafeera pcsk9inhibitorsandcardiovascularoutcomesasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis