Cargando…

Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leak (AL) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication after rectal resection. We aim to provide an updated assessment of bowel function and quality of life after AL, as well as associated short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective audit of all rectal res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Re, Angelina Di, Tooza, Salam, Diab, Jason, Karam, Charbel, Sarofim, Mina, Ooi, Kevin, Turner, Catherine, Kozman, Daniel, Blomberg, David, Morgan, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Coloproctology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35417955
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00073.0010
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Anastomotic leak (AL) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication after rectal resection. We aim to provide an updated assessment of bowel function and quality of life after AL, as well as associated short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective audit of all rectal resections performed at a colorectal unit and associated private hospitals over the past 10 years was performed. Relevant demographic, operative, and histopathological data were collected. A prospective survey was performed regarding patients’ quality of life and fecal continence. These patients were matched with nonAL patients who completed the same survey. RESULTS: One hundred patients (out of 1,394 resections) were included. AL was contained in 66.0%, not contained in 10.0%, and only anastomotic stricture in 24.0%. Management was antibiotics only in 39.0%, percutaneous drainage in 9.0%, operative abdominal drainage in 19.0%, transrectal drainage in 6.0%, combination of percutaneous drainage and transrectal drainage in 2.0%, and combination abdominal/transrectal drainage in 1.0%. The 1-year stoma rate was 15.0%. Overall, mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Instrument scores were higher for AL patients than their matched counterparts (8.06±10.5 vs. 2.92±4.92, P=0.002). Patients with an AL had a mean EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of 76.23±19.85; this was lower than the matched mean EQ-VAS for non-AL patients of 81.64±18.07, although not statistically significant (P=0.180). CONCLUSION: The majority of AL patients in this study were managed with antibiotics only. AL was associated with higher fecal incontinence scores in the long-term; however, this did not equate to lower quality of life scores.