Cargando…

Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leak (AL) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication after rectal resection. We aim to provide an updated assessment of bowel function and quality of life after AL, as well as associated short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective audit of all rectal res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Re, Angelina Di, Tooza, Salam, Diab, Jason, Karam, Charbel, Sarofim, Mina, Ooi, Kevin, Turner, Catherine, Kozman, Daniel, Blomberg, David, Morgan, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Coloproctology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35417955
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00073.0010
_version_ 1785131322127155200
author Re, Angelina Di
Tooza, Salam
Diab, Jason
Karam, Charbel
Sarofim, Mina
Ooi, Kevin
Turner, Catherine
Kozman, Daniel
Blomberg, David
Morgan, Matthew
author_facet Re, Angelina Di
Tooza, Salam
Diab, Jason
Karam, Charbel
Sarofim, Mina
Ooi, Kevin
Turner, Catherine
Kozman, Daniel
Blomberg, David
Morgan, Matthew
author_sort Re, Angelina Di
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Anastomotic leak (AL) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication after rectal resection. We aim to provide an updated assessment of bowel function and quality of life after AL, as well as associated short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective audit of all rectal resections performed at a colorectal unit and associated private hospitals over the past 10 years was performed. Relevant demographic, operative, and histopathological data were collected. A prospective survey was performed regarding patients’ quality of life and fecal continence. These patients were matched with nonAL patients who completed the same survey. RESULTS: One hundred patients (out of 1,394 resections) were included. AL was contained in 66.0%, not contained in 10.0%, and only anastomotic stricture in 24.0%. Management was antibiotics only in 39.0%, percutaneous drainage in 9.0%, operative abdominal drainage in 19.0%, transrectal drainage in 6.0%, combination of percutaneous drainage and transrectal drainage in 2.0%, and combination abdominal/transrectal drainage in 1.0%. The 1-year stoma rate was 15.0%. Overall, mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Instrument scores were higher for AL patients than their matched counterparts (8.06±10.5 vs. 2.92±4.92, P=0.002). Patients with an AL had a mean EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of 76.23±19.85; this was lower than the matched mean EQ-VAS for non-AL patients of 81.64±18.07, although not statistically significant (P=0.180). CONCLUSION: The majority of AL patients in this study were managed with antibiotics only. AL was associated with higher fecal incontinence scores in the long-term; however, this did not equate to lower quality of life scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10626330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106263302023-11-07 Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life Re, Angelina Di Tooza, Salam Diab, Jason Karam, Charbel Sarofim, Mina Ooi, Kevin Turner, Catherine Kozman, Daniel Blomberg, David Morgan, Matthew Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Anastomotic leak (AL) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication after rectal resection. We aim to provide an updated assessment of bowel function and quality of life after AL, as well as associated short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective audit of all rectal resections performed at a colorectal unit and associated private hospitals over the past 10 years was performed. Relevant demographic, operative, and histopathological data were collected. A prospective survey was performed regarding patients’ quality of life and fecal continence. These patients were matched with nonAL patients who completed the same survey. RESULTS: One hundred patients (out of 1,394 resections) were included. AL was contained in 66.0%, not contained in 10.0%, and only anastomotic stricture in 24.0%. Management was antibiotics only in 39.0%, percutaneous drainage in 9.0%, operative abdominal drainage in 19.0%, transrectal drainage in 6.0%, combination of percutaneous drainage and transrectal drainage in 2.0%, and combination abdominal/transrectal drainage in 1.0%. The 1-year stoma rate was 15.0%. Overall, mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Instrument scores were higher for AL patients than their matched counterparts (8.06±10.5 vs. 2.92±4.92, P=0.002). Patients with an AL had a mean EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of 76.23±19.85; this was lower than the matched mean EQ-VAS for non-AL patients of 81.64±18.07, although not statistically significant (P=0.180). CONCLUSION: The majority of AL patients in this study were managed with antibiotics only. AL was associated with higher fecal incontinence scores in the long-term; however, this did not equate to lower quality of life scores. Korean Society of Coloproctology 2023-10 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10626330/ /pubmed/35417955 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00073.0010 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society of Coloproctology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Re, Angelina Di
Tooza, Salam
Diab, Jason
Karam, Charbel
Sarofim, Mina
Ooi, Kevin
Turner, Catherine
Kozman, Daniel
Blomberg, David
Morgan, Matthew
Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life
title Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life
title_full Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life
title_fullStr Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life
title_short Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life
title_sort outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35417955
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00073.0010
work_keys_str_mv AT reangelinadi outcomesfollowinganastomoticleakfromrectalresectionsincludingbowelfunctionandqualityoflife
AT toozasalam outcomesfollowinganastomoticleakfromrectalresectionsincludingbowelfunctionandqualityoflife
AT diabjason outcomesfollowinganastomoticleakfromrectalresectionsincludingbowelfunctionandqualityoflife
AT karamcharbel outcomesfollowinganastomoticleakfromrectalresectionsincludingbowelfunctionandqualityoflife
AT sarofimmina outcomesfollowinganastomoticleakfromrectalresectionsincludingbowelfunctionandqualityoflife
AT ooikevin outcomesfollowinganastomoticleakfromrectalresectionsincludingbowelfunctionandqualityoflife
AT turnercatherine outcomesfollowinganastomoticleakfromrectalresectionsincludingbowelfunctionandqualityoflife
AT kozmandaniel outcomesfollowinganastomoticleakfromrectalresectionsincludingbowelfunctionandqualityoflife
AT blombergdavid outcomesfollowinganastomoticleakfromrectalresectionsincludingbowelfunctionandqualityoflife
AT morganmatthew outcomesfollowinganastomoticleakfromrectalresectionsincludingbowelfunctionandqualityoflife