Cargando…
Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
PURPOSE: This study aimed to review the outcomes of redo procedures for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing colectomy with primary colorec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Coloproctology
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36535708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00605.0086 |
_version_ | 1785131323084505088 |
---|---|
author | Galletti, Ricardo Purchio Agareno, Gabriel Andrade Sesconetto, Lucas de Abreu da Silva, Rafael Benjamim Rosa Pandini, Rafael Vaz Gerbasi, Lucas Soares Seid, Victor Edmond Araujo, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso Tustumi, Francisco |
author_facet | Galletti, Ricardo Purchio Agareno, Gabriel Andrade Sesconetto, Lucas de Abreu da Silva, Rafael Benjamim Rosa Pandini, Rafael Vaz Gerbasi, Lucas Soares Seid, Victor Edmond Araujo, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso Tustumi, Francisco |
author_sort | Galletti, Ricardo Purchio |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to review the outcomes of redo procedures for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing colectomy with primary colorectal or coloanal anastomosis and studies that assessed the postoperative results. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42021267715). RESULTS: Eleven articles met the eligibility criteria and were selected. The studied population size ranged from 7 to 78 patients. The overall mortality rate was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%–0.01%). The postoperative complication rate was 40% (95% CI, 40%–50%). The length of hospital stay was 13.68 days (95% CI, 11.3–16.06 days). After redo surgery, 82% of the patients were free of stoma (95% CI, 75%–90%), and 24% of patients (95% CI, 0%–39%) had fecal incontinence. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (P=0.002) was associated with a lower probability of being free of stoma in meta-regression. CONCLUSION: Redo colorectal and coloanal anastomoses are strategies to restore colonic continuity. The decision to perform a redo operation should be based on a proper evaluation of the morbidity and mortality risks, the probability of remaining free of stoma, the quality of life, and a functional assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10626334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Korean Society of Coloproctology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106263342023-11-07 Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis Galletti, Ricardo Purchio Agareno, Gabriel Andrade Sesconetto, Lucas de Abreu da Silva, Rafael Benjamim Rosa Pandini, Rafael Vaz Gerbasi, Lucas Soares Seid, Victor Edmond Araujo, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso Tustumi, Francisco Ann Coloproctol Review PURPOSE: This study aimed to review the outcomes of redo procedures for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing colectomy with primary colorectal or coloanal anastomosis and studies that assessed the postoperative results. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42021267715). RESULTS: Eleven articles met the eligibility criteria and were selected. The studied population size ranged from 7 to 78 patients. The overall mortality rate was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%–0.01%). The postoperative complication rate was 40% (95% CI, 40%–50%). The length of hospital stay was 13.68 days (95% CI, 11.3–16.06 days). After redo surgery, 82% of the patients were free of stoma (95% CI, 75%–90%), and 24% of patients (95% CI, 0%–39%) had fecal incontinence. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (P=0.002) was associated with a lower probability of being free of stoma in meta-regression. CONCLUSION: Redo colorectal and coloanal anastomoses are strategies to restore colonic continuity. The decision to perform a redo operation should be based on a proper evaluation of the morbidity and mortality risks, the probability of remaining free of stoma, the quality of life, and a functional assessment. Korean Society of Coloproctology 2023-10 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10626334/ /pubmed/36535708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00605.0086 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society of Coloproctology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Galletti, Ricardo Purchio Agareno, Gabriel Andrade Sesconetto, Lucas de Abreu da Silva, Rafael Benjamim Rosa Pandini, Rafael Vaz Gerbasi, Lucas Soares Seid, Victor Edmond Araujo, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso Tustumi, Francisco Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36535708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00605.0086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gallettiricardopurchio outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT agarenogabrielandrade outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sesconettolucasdeabreu outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dasilvarafaelbenjamimrosa outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pandinirafaelvaz outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gerbasilucassoares outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT seidvictoredmond outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT araujosergioeduardoalonso outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tustumifrancisco outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |