Cargando…

Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: This study aimed to review the outcomes of redo procedures for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing colectomy with primary colorec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galletti, Ricardo Purchio, Agareno, Gabriel Andrade, Sesconetto, Lucas de Abreu, da Silva, Rafael Benjamim Rosa, Pandini, Rafael Vaz, Gerbasi, Lucas Soares, Seid, Victor Edmond, Araujo, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso, Tustumi, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Coloproctology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36535708
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00605.0086
_version_ 1785131323084505088
author Galletti, Ricardo Purchio
Agareno, Gabriel Andrade
Sesconetto, Lucas de Abreu
da Silva, Rafael Benjamim Rosa
Pandini, Rafael Vaz
Gerbasi, Lucas Soares
Seid, Victor Edmond
Araujo, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso
Tustumi, Francisco
author_facet Galletti, Ricardo Purchio
Agareno, Gabriel Andrade
Sesconetto, Lucas de Abreu
da Silva, Rafael Benjamim Rosa
Pandini, Rafael Vaz
Gerbasi, Lucas Soares
Seid, Victor Edmond
Araujo, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso
Tustumi, Francisco
author_sort Galletti, Ricardo Purchio
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to review the outcomes of redo procedures for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing colectomy with primary colorectal or coloanal anastomosis and studies that assessed the postoperative results. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42021267715). RESULTS: Eleven articles met the eligibility criteria and were selected. The studied population size ranged from 7 to 78 patients. The overall mortality rate was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%–0.01%). The postoperative complication rate was 40% (95% CI, 40%–50%). The length of hospital stay was 13.68 days (95% CI, 11.3–16.06 days). After redo surgery, 82% of the patients were free of stoma (95% CI, 75%–90%), and 24% of patients (95% CI, 0%–39%) had fecal incontinence. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (P=0.002) was associated with a lower probability of being free of stoma in meta-regression. CONCLUSION: Redo colorectal and coloanal anastomoses are strategies to restore colonic continuity. The decision to perform a redo operation should be based on a proper evaluation of the morbidity and mortality risks, the probability of remaining free of stoma, the quality of life, and a functional assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10626334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106263342023-11-07 Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis Galletti, Ricardo Purchio Agareno, Gabriel Andrade Sesconetto, Lucas de Abreu da Silva, Rafael Benjamim Rosa Pandini, Rafael Vaz Gerbasi, Lucas Soares Seid, Victor Edmond Araujo, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso Tustumi, Francisco Ann Coloproctol Review PURPOSE: This study aimed to review the outcomes of redo procedures for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing colectomy with primary colorectal or coloanal anastomosis and studies that assessed the postoperative results. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42021267715). RESULTS: Eleven articles met the eligibility criteria and were selected. The studied population size ranged from 7 to 78 patients. The overall mortality rate was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%–0.01%). The postoperative complication rate was 40% (95% CI, 40%–50%). The length of hospital stay was 13.68 days (95% CI, 11.3–16.06 days). After redo surgery, 82% of the patients were free of stoma (95% CI, 75%–90%), and 24% of patients (95% CI, 0%–39%) had fecal incontinence. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (P=0.002) was associated with a lower probability of being free of stoma in meta-regression. CONCLUSION: Redo colorectal and coloanal anastomoses are strategies to restore colonic continuity. The decision to perform a redo operation should be based on a proper evaluation of the morbidity and mortality risks, the probability of remaining free of stoma, the quality of life, and a functional assessment. Korean Society of Coloproctology 2023-10 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10626334/ /pubmed/36535708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00605.0086 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Korean Society of Coloproctology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Galletti, Ricardo Purchio
Agareno, Gabriel Andrade
Sesconetto, Lucas de Abreu
da Silva, Rafael Benjamim Rosa
Pandini, Rafael Vaz
Gerbasi, Lucas Soares
Seid, Victor Edmond
Araujo, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso
Tustumi, Francisco
Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36535708
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00605.0086
work_keys_str_mv AT gallettiricardopurchio outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT agarenogabrielandrade outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sesconettolucasdeabreu outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dasilvarafaelbenjamimrosa outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pandinirafaelvaz outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gerbasilucassoares outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT seidvictoredmond outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT araujosergioeduardoalonso outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tustumifrancisco outcomesofredoforfailedcolorectalorcoloanalanastomosesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis