Cargando…

Autologous Stem Cell Collection after Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION: In transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients, autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection is usually pursued after induction therapy. While induction regimens are constantly refined regarding response, their impact on PBSC collection is not fully...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sauer, Sandra, Kriegsmann, Katharina, Nientiedt, Cathleen, Schmitt, Anita, Müller-Tidow, Carsten, Raab, Marc-Steffen, Kauer, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000529691
_version_ 1785131330417197056
author Sauer, Sandra
Kriegsmann, Katharina
Nientiedt, Cathleen
Schmitt, Anita
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Raab, Marc-Steffen
Kauer, Joseph
author_facet Sauer, Sandra
Kriegsmann, Katharina
Nientiedt, Cathleen
Schmitt, Anita
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Raab, Marc-Steffen
Kauer, Joseph
author_sort Sauer, Sandra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients, autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection is usually pursued after induction therapy. While induction regimens are constantly refined regarding response, their impact on PBSC collection is not fully studied. The inclusion of the anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab into induction therapy significantly improved outcomes for patients with NDMM, e.g., as part of the daratumumab, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (Dara-VTD) protocol. Preliminary data from the phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study proved the efficacy of Dara-VTD. While overall PBSC collection upon addition of daratumumab was reduced in the study population, more detailed analyses on the impact are missing. METHODS: We here report on PBSC mobilization and collection metrics in n = 119 patients with NDMM who underwent induction therapy with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCD, n = 61) or Dara-VTD (n = 58). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were well balanced between groups. The Dara-VTD group showed improved response parameters with 66% of patients reaching at least very good partial response versus 54% in the VCD group. Dara-VTD patients exhibited inferior mobilization metrics such as peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count at the first leukapheresis (LP) session (65 vs. 106/μL, p = 0.001), median number of LP sessions (2 vs. 1, p = 0.001), and PBSC collection at first LP (5.5 vs. 8.3 × 10(6)/kg body weight [bw], p = 0.001). Utilization of plerixafor was slightly higher after Dara-VTD (33% vs. 21% of patients, p = 0.143). The overall PBSC collection result was significantly lower after Dara-VTD (8.4 vs. 9.6 × 10(6)/kg bw, p = 0.026). 78% and 85% of patients successfully collected 3 transplants with ≥2 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg bw in the Dara-VTD and the VCD groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In summary, Dara-VTD, possibly due to both anti-CD38 antibody and thalidomide exposure, imposes a limitation on PBSC collection which can be only partly overcome by utilization of plerixafor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10626396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106263962023-11-07 Autologous Stem Cell Collection after Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Sauer, Sandra Kriegsmann, Katharina Nientiedt, Cathleen Schmitt, Anita Müller-Tidow, Carsten Raab, Marc-Steffen Kauer, Joseph Transfus Med Hemother Research Article INTRODUCTION: In transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients, autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection is usually pursued after induction therapy. While induction regimens are constantly refined regarding response, their impact on PBSC collection is not fully studied. The inclusion of the anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab into induction therapy significantly improved outcomes for patients with NDMM, e.g., as part of the daratumumab, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (Dara-VTD) protocol. Preliminary data from the phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study proved the efficacy of Dara-VTD. While overall PBSC collection upon addition of daratumumab was reduced in the study population, more detailed analyses on the impact are missing. METHODS: We here report on PBSC mobilization and collection metrics in n = 119 patients with NDMM who underwent induction therapy with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCD, n = 61) or Dara-VTD (n = 58). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were well balanced between groups. The Dara-VTD group showed improved response parameters with 66% of patients reaching at least very good partial response versus 54% in the VCD group. Dara-VTD patients exhibited inferior mobilization metrics such as peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count at the first leukapheresis (LP) session (65 vs. 106/μL, p = 0.001), median number of LP sessions (2 vs. 1, p = 0.001), and PBSC collection at first LP (5.5 vs. 8.3 × 10(6)/kg body weight [bw], p = 0.001). Utilization of plerixafor was slightly higher after Dara-VTD (33% vs. 21% of patients, p = 0.143). The overall PBSC collection result was significantly lower after Dara-VTD (8.4 vs. 9.6 × 10(6)/kg bw, p = 0.026). 78% and 85% of patients successfully collected 3 transplants with ≥2 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg bw in the Dara-VTD and the VCD groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In summary, Dara-VTD, possibly due to both anti-CD38 antibody and thalidomide exposure, imposes a limitation on PBSC collection which can be only partly overcome by utilization of plerixafor. S. Karger AG 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10626396/ /pubmed/37936633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000529691 Text en Copyright © 2023 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sauer, Sandra
Kriegsmann, Katharina
Nientiedt, Cathleen
Schmitt, Anita
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Raab, Marc-Steffen
Kauer, Joseph
Autologous Stem Cell Collection after Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
title Autologous Stem Cell Collection after Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
title_full Autologous Stem Cell Collection after Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
title_fullStr Autologous Stem Cell Collection after Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Autologous Stem Cell Collection after Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
title_short Autologous Stem Cell Collection after Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
title_sort autologous stem cell collection after daratumumab, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone versus bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000529691
work_keys_str_mv AT sauersandra autologousstemcellcollectionafterdaratumumabbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasoneversusbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma
AT kriegsmannkatharina autologousstemcellcollectionafterdaratumumabbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasoneversusbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma
AT nientiedtcathleen autologousstemcellcollectionafterdaratumumabbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasoneversusbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma
AT schmittanita autologousstemcellcollectionafterdaratumumabbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasoneversusbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma
AT mullertidowcarsten autologousstemcellcollectionafterdaratumumabbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasoneversusbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma
AT raabmarcsteffen autologousstemcellcollectionafterdaratumumabbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasoneversusbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma
AT kauerjoseph autologousstemcellcollectionafterdaratumumabbortezomibthalidomideanddexamethasoneversusbortezomibcyclophosphamideanddexamethasoneinnewlydiagnosedmultiplemyeloma