Cargando…
Do we correctly calculate doses of cardioplegia during aortic valve replacement procedures? A preliminary report
INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative myocardial protection during aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) is of paramount importance for outcomes. The dose of cardioplegia is usually calculated with reference to body mass. AIM: To assess whether such a strategy should be applied to all AS pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937173 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2023.130660 |
_version_ | 1785131331347283968 |
---|---|
author | Sucharska, Aleksandra Adamowska, Agnieszka Karbowska, Zuzanna Kumar, Lavanya Mohan Pudełko, Jakub Szarpak, Łukasz Jemielity, Marek Perek, Bartłomiej |
author_facet | Sucharska, Aleksandra Adamowska, Agnieszka Karbowska, Zuzanna Kumar, Lavanya Mohan Pudełko, Jakub Szarpak, Łukasz Jemielity, Marek Perek, Bartłomiej |
author_sort | Sucharska, Aleksandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative myocardial protection during aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) is of paramount importance for outcomes. The dose of cardioplegia is usually calculated with reference to body mass. AIM: To assess whether such a strategy should be applied to all AS patients undergoing AVR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 94 patients who underwent elective isolated AVR in cardiopulmonary bypass with cold cardioplegic arrest, with a mean age of 65.4 ±7.8 years. They were divided into two subgroup: A with an infusion of high (above median) and subgroup B with a low (below median) volume of cardioplegia indexed for left ventricular mass (LVM). Their doses were referred to the maximal postoperative release of cardiac troponin I (cTnI max). Eventually, it was examined whether the extent of intraoperative myocardial injury translated into long-term survival stratified according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The mean volume of cardioplegia was 1381 ±279 ml (4.9 ±1.6 ml/g of LV myocardium). cTnI max was much higher in group A than in group B (medians: 14.918 vs. 9.876 μg/l; p = 0.005). Moreover, a negative correlation between the index cardioplegia volume and cTnI max (r = 0.345) was noted. The five-year probability of survival in subgroup A (95.7%) was significantly better than that in subgroup B individuals (82.6%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Calculating cardioplegic doses during AVR solely based on body mass may be suboptimal and have a significant impact on postoperative outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10626402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106264022023-11-07 Do we correctly calculate doses of cardioplegia during aortic valve replacement procedures? A preliminary report Sucharska, Aleksandra Adamowska, Agnieszka Karbowska, Zuzanna Kumar, Lavanya Mohan Pudełko, Jakub Szarpak, Łukasz Jemielity, Marek Perek, Bartłomiej Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative myocardial protection during aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) is of paramount importance for outcomes. The dose of cardioplegia is usually calculated with reference to body mass. AIM: To assess whether such a strategy should be applied to all AS patients undergoing AVR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 94 patients who underwent elective isolated AVR in cardiopulmonary bypass with cold cardioplegic arrest, with a mean age of 65.4 ±7.8 years. They were divided into two subgroup: A with an infusion of high (above median) and subgroup B with a low (below median) volume of cardioplegia indexed for left ventricular mass (LVM). Their doses were referred to the maximal postoperative release of cardiac troponin I (cTnI max). Eventually, it was examined whether the extent of intraoperative myocardial injury translated into long-term survival stratified according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The mean volume of cardioplegia was 1381 ±279 ml (4.9 ±1.6 ml/g of LV myocardium). cTnI max was much higher in group A than in group B (medians: 14.918 vs. 9.876 μg/l; p = 0.005). Moreover, a negative correlation between the index cardioplegia volume and cTnI max (r = 0.345) was noted. The five-year probability of survival in subgroup A (95.7%) was significantly better than that in subgroup B individuals (82.6%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Calculating cardioplegic doses during AVR solely based on body mass may be suboptimal and have a significant impact on postoperative outcomes. Termedia Publishing House 2023-09-11 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10626402/ /pubmed/37937173 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2023.130660 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Polish Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons (Polskie Towarzystwo KardioTorakochirurgów) and the editors of the Polish Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Sucharska, Aleksandra Adamowska, Agnieszka Karbowska, Zuzanna Kumar, Lavanya Mohan Pudełko, Jakub Szarpak, Łukasz Jemielity, Marek Perek, Bartłomiej Do we correctly calculate doses of cardioplegia during aortic valve replacement procedures? A preliminary report |
title | Do we correctly calculate doses of cardioplegia during aortic valve replacement procedures? A preliminary report |
title_full | Do we correctly calculate doses of cardioplegia during aortic valve replacement procedures? A preliminary report |
title_fullStr | Do we correctly calculate doses of cardioplegia during aortic valve replacement procedures? A preliminary report |
title_full_unstemmed | Do we correctly calculate doses of cardioplegia during aortic valve replacement procedures? A preliminary report |
title_short | Do we correctly calculate doses of cardioplegia during aortic valve replacement procedures? A preliminary report |
title_sort | do we correctly calculate doses of cardioplegia during aortic valve replacement procedures? a preliminary report |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937173 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2023.130660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sucharskaaleksandra dowecorrectlycalculatedosesofcardioplegiaduringaorticvalvereplacementproceduresapreliminaryreport AT adamowskaagnieszka dowecorrectlycalculatedosesofcardioplegiaduringaorticvalvereplacementproceduresapreliminaryreport AT karbowskazuzanna dowecorrectlycalculatedosesofcardioplegiaduringaorticvalvereplacementproceduresapreliminaryreport AT kumarlavanyamohan dowecorrectlycalculatedosesofcardioplegiaduringaorticvalvereplacementproceduresapreliminaryreport AT pudełkojakub dowecorrectlycalculatedosesofcardioplegiaduringaorticvalvereplacementproceduresapreliminaryreport AT szarpakłukasz dowecorrectlycalculatedosesofcardioplegiaduringaorticvalvereplacementproceduresapreliminaryreport AT jemielitymarek dowecorrectlycalculatedosesofcardioplegiaduringaorticvalvereplacementproceduresapreliminaryreport AT perekbartłomiej dowecorrectlycalculatedosesofcardioplegiaduringaorticvalvereplacementproceduresapreliminaryreport |