Cargando…

Reduction in Primary Operator Radiation Dose Exposure During Coronary Angioplasty Using Radiation Absorbing Drape

Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) involves the use of ionizing radiation and is a common procedure in a cardiac catheterization suite. The RADPAD® surgical drape (Worldwide Innovations & Technologies, Inc., Lenexa, KS) has been developed to reduce scatter radiation exposure to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Amit B, Agrawal, Richa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937037
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46619
_version_ 1785131363078242304
author Sharma, Amit B
Agrawal, Richa
author_facet Sharma, Amit B
Agrawal, Richa
author_sort Sharma, Amit B
collection PubMed
description Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) involves the use of ionizing radiation and is a common procedure in a cardiac catheterization suite. The RADPAD® surgical drape (Worldwide Innovations & Technologies, Inc., Lenexa, KS) has been developed to reduce scatter radiation exposure to primary operators during routine PCI procedures. This study aims to assess the efficacy of RADPAD drapes in reducing radiation dose in the catheterization laboratory. Methods This was a single-center, prospective, observational study that aimed to compare the primary operator dose received with and without the use of a commercially available shield (RADPAD) during PCI. A total of 53 consecutive patients undergoing PCI were randomized in a 1:1 pattern to receive either the RADPAD (study group) or no RADPAD (control group). Standard shielding and personal protective equipment were used. Radiation exposure to the primary operator, total fluoroscopy time, number of cine acquisitions, and air kerma were recorded for each procedure. A one-way ANOVA calculator, including the Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) test, was used to compare the mean values of radiation exposure. Scatterplot analysis and linear regression slopes of dose relative to air kerma were performed. All shields were reused once only. Results The study compared radiation exposure during PCI procedures between patients who received radiation attenuation devices (RADPAD) and those who did not. The RADPAD group had 30 patients, while the NO RADPAD group had 23 patients. There was a significant difference in the number of coronary angiography and single/multi-vessel PCI procedures between the two groups. There was no significant difference in procedural time or air kerma dose between the groups, but the RADPAD group had a significantly lower radiation dose (mean dose of 3.679 mrem) compared to the NO RADPAD group (mean dose of 8.12 mrem) (p < 0.00001). The primary operator dose per unit of air kerma was also significantly lower in the RADPAD group. Overall, the use of RADPAD resulted in a significant reduction in radiation exposure during PCI procedures. Conclusion The present study provides further evidence for the efficacy of using radiation-absorbing drapes (RADPAD) in reducing primary operator radiation dose exposure during coronary angioplasty. The equipment for radiation dose reduction of patients also reduces the radiation dose of medical staff. Therefore, the use of RADPAD is recommended as a safe and effective measure for reducing operator radiation dose exposure during coronary angioplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10626564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106265642023-11-07 Reduction in Primary Operator Radiation Dose Exposure During Coronary Angioplasty Using Radiation Absorbing Drape Sharma, Amit B Agrawal, Richa Cureus Cardiology Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) involves the use of ionizing radiation and is a common procedure in a cardiac catheterization suite. The RADPAD® surgical drape (Worldwide Innovations & Technologies, Inc., Lenexa, KS) has been developed to reduce scatter radiation exposure to primary operators during routine PCI procedures. This study aims to assess the efficacy of RADPAD drapes in reducing radiation dose in the catheterization laboratory. Methods This was a single-center, prospective, observational study that aimed to compare the primary operator dose received with and without the use of a commercially available shield (RADPAD) during PCI. A total of 53 consecutive patients undergoing PCI were randomized in a 1:1 pattern to receive either the RADPAD (study group) or no RADPAD (control group). Standard shielding and personal protective equipment were used. Radiation exposure to the primary operator, total fluoroscopy time, number of cine acquisitions, and air kerma were recorded for each procedure. A one-way ANOVA calculator, including the Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) test, was used to compare the mean values of radiation exposure. Scatterplot analysis and linear regression slopes of dose relative to air kerma were performed. All shields were reused once only. Results The study compared radiation exposure during PCI procedures between patients who received radiation attenuation devices (RADPAD) and those who did not. The RADPAD group had 30 patients, while the NO RADPAD group had 23 patients. There was a significant difference in the number of coronary angiography and single/multi-vessel PCI procedures between the two groups. There was no significant difference in procedural time or air kerma dose between the groups, but the RADPAD group had a significantly lower radiation dose (mean dose of 3.679 mrem) compared to the NO RADPAD group (mean dose of 8.12 mrem) (p < 0.00001). The primary operator dose per unit of air kerma was also significantly lower in the RADPAD group. Overall, the use of RADPAD resulted in a significant reduction in radiation exposure during PCI procedures. Conclusion The present study provides further evidence for the efficacy of using radiation-absorbing drapes (RADPAD) in reducing primary operator radiation dose exposure during coronary angioplasty. The equipment for radiation dose reduction of patients also reduces the radiation dose of medical staff. Therefore, the use of RADPAD is recommended as a safe and effective measure for reducing operator radiation dose exposure during coronary angioplasty. Cureus 2023-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10626564/ /pubmed/37937037 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46619 Text en Copyright © 2023, Sharma et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Sharma, Amit B
Agrawal, Richa
Reduction in Primary Operator Radiation Dose Exposure During Coronary Angioplasty Using Radiation Absorbing Drape
title Reduction in Primary Operator Radiation Dose Exposure During Coronary Angioplasty Using Radiation Absorbing Drape
title_full Reduction in Primary Operator Radiation Dose Exposure During Coronary Angioplasty Using Radiation Absorbing Drape
title_fullStr Reduction in Primary Operator Radiation Dose Exposure During Coronary Angioplasty Using Radiation Absorbing Drape
title_full_unstemmed Reduction in Primary Operator Radiation Dose Exposure During Coronary Angioplasty Using Radiation Absorbing Drape
title_short Reduction in Primary Operator Radiation Dose Exposure During Coronary Angioplasty Using Radiation Absorbing Drape
title_sort reduction in primary operator radiation dose exposure during coronary angioplasty using radiation absorbing drape
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937037
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46619
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaamitb reductioninprimaryoperatorradiationdoseexposureduringcoronaryangioplastyusingradiationabsorbingdrape
AT agrawalricha reductioninprimaryoperatorradiationdoseexposureduringcoronaryangioplastyusingradiationabsorbingdrape