Cargando…
School and childcare facility air quality decision-makers’ perspectives on using low-cost sensors for wildfire smoke response
BACKGROUND: During wildfire smoke episodes, school and childcare facility staff and those who support them rely upon air quality data to inform activity decisions. Where ambient regulatory monitor data is sparse, low-cost sensors can help inform local outdoor activity decisions, and provide indoor a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16989-7 |
_version_ | 1785131383376576512 |
---|---|
author | Stampfer, Orly Farquhar, Stephanie Seto, Edmund Karr, Catherine J. |
author_facet | Stampfer, Orly Farquhar, Stephanie Seto, Edmund Karr, Catherine J. |
author_sort | Stampfer, Orly |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During wildfire smoke episodes, school and childcare facility staff and those who support them rely upon air quality data to inform activity decisions. Where ambient regulatory monitor data is sparse, low-cost sensors can help inform local outdoor activity decisions, and provide indoor air quality data. However, there is no established protocol for air quality decision-makers to use sensor data for schools and childcare facilities. To develop practical, effective toolkits to guide the use of sensors in school and childcare settings, it is essential to understand the perspectives of the potential end-users of such toolkit materials. METHODS: We conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with school, childcare, local health jurisdiction, air quality, and school district personnel regarding sensor use for wildfire smoke response. Interviews included sharing PM(2.5) data collected at schools during wildfire smoke. Interviews were transcribed and transcripts were coded using a codebook developed both a priori and amended as additional themes emerged. RESULTS: Three major themes were identified by organizing complementary codes together: (1) Low-cost sensors are useful despite data quality limitations, (2) Low-cost sensor data can inform decision-making to protect children in school and childcare settings, and (3) There are feasibility and public perception-related barriers to using low-cost sensors. CONCLUSIONS: Interview responses provided practical implications for toolkit development, including demonstrating a need for toolkits that allow a variety of sensor preferences. In addition, participants expected to have a wide range of available time for monitoring, budget for sensors, and decision-making types. Finally, interview responses revealed a need for toolkits to address sensor uses outside of activity decisions, especially assessment of ventilation and filtration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16989-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10626666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106266662023-11-07 School and childcare facility air quality decision-makers’ perspectives on using low-cost sensors for wildfire smoke response Stampfer, Orly Farquhar, Stephanie Seto, Edmund Karr, Catherine J. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: During wildfire smoke episodes, school and childcare facility staff and those who support them rely upon air quality data to inform activity decisions. Where ambient regulatory monitor data is sparse, low-cost sensors can help inform local outdoor activity decisions, and provide indoor air quality data. However, there is no established protocol for air quality decision-makers to use sensor data for schools and childcare facilities. To develop practical, effective toolkits to guide the use of sensors in school and childcare settings, it is essential to understand the perspectives of the potential end-users of such toolkit materials. METHODS: We conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with school, childcare, local health jurisdiction, air quality, and school district personnel regarding sensor use for wildfire smoke response. Interviews included sharing PM(2.5) data collected at schools during wildfire smoke. Interviews were transcribed and transcripts were coded using a codebook developed both a priori and amended as additional themes emerged. RESULTS: Three major themes were identified by organizing complementary codes together: (1) Low-cost sensors are useful despite data quality limitations, (2) Low-cost sensor data can inform decision-making to protect children in school and childcare settings, and (3) There are feasibility and public perception-related barriers to using low-cost sensors. CONCLUSIONS: Interview responses provided practical implications for toolkit development, including demonstrating a need for toolkits that allow a variety of sensor preferences. In addition, participants expected to have a wide range of available time for monitoring, budget for sensors, and decision-making types. Finally, interview responses revealed a need for toolkits to address sensor uses outside of activity decisions, especially assessment of ventilation and filtration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16989-7. BioMed Central 2023-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10626666/ /pubmed/37932665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16989-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Stampfer, Orly Farquhar, Stephanie Seto, Edmund Karr, Catherine J. School and childcare facility air quality decision-makers’ perspectives on using low-cost sensors for wildfire smoke response |
title | School and childcare facility air quality decision-makers’ perspectives on using low-cost sensors for wildfire smoke response |
title_full | School and childcare facility air quality decision-makers’ perspectives on using low-cost sensors for wildfire smoke response |
title_fullStr | School and childcare facility air quality decision-makers’ perspectives on using low-cost sensors for wildfire smoke response |
title_full_unstemmed | School and childcare facility air quality decision-makers’ perspectives on using low-cost sensors for wildfire smoke response |
title_short | School and childcare facility air quality decision-makers’ perspectives on using low-cost sensors for wildfire smoke response |
title_sort | school and childcare facility air quality decision-makers’ perspectives on using low-cost sensors for wildfire smoke response |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16989-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stampferorly schoolandchildcarefacilityairqualitydecisionmakersperspectivesonusinglowcostsensorsforwildfiresmokeresponse AT farquharstephanie schoolandchildcarefacilityairqualitydecisionmakersperspectivesonusinglowcostsensorsforwildfiresmokeresponse AT setoedmund schoolandchildcarefacilityairqualitydecisionmakersperspectivesonusinglowcostsensorsforwildfiresmokeresponse AT karrcatherinej schoolandchildcarefacilityairqualitydecisionmakersperspectivesonusinglowcostsensorsforwildfiresmokeresponse |