Cargando…

Assessing characteristics of populations seen at Commission on Cancer facilities using Pennsylvania linked data

Commission on Cancer (CoC) accreditation certifies facilities provide quality care. We assessed differences among patients who do and do not visit CoC facilities using Pennsylvania Cancer Registry data linked to facility records for patients diagnosed with cancer between 2018 and 2019 (n = 87 472)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reed, Kristine G, Sun, Zhaojun, Yabes, Jonathan G, Drake, Coleman, Ober, Nicole, Jacobs, Bruce, van Londen, G J, Bradley, Cathy J, Sabik, Lindsay M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37788093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad080
_version_ 1785131449449447424
author Reed, Kristine G
Sun, Zhaojun
Yabes, Jonathan G
Drake, Coleman
Ober, Nicole
Jacobs, Bruce
van Londen, G J
Bradley, Cathy J
Sabik, Lindsay M
author_facet Reed, Kristine G
Sun, Zhaojun
Yabes, Jonathan G
Drake, Coleman
Ober, Nicole
Jacobs, Bruce
van Londen, G J
Bradley, Cathy J
Sabik, Lindsay M
author_sort Reed, Kristine G
collection PubMed
description Commission on Cancer (CoC) accreditation certifies facilities provide quality care. We assessed differences among patients who do and do not visit CoC facilities using Pennsylvania Cancer Registry data linked to facility records for patients diagnosed with cancer between 2018 and 2019 (n = 87 472). Predicted probabilities from multivariable logistic regression indicated patients in the most advantaged Area Deprivation Index quartiles were more likely to visit CoC facilities (78.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 77.5% to 78.6%) compared with other quartiles. Urban patients (74.1%, 95% CI = 73.8% to 74.4%) were more likely than rural to be seen at a CoC facility (62.7%, 95% CI = 61.2% to 64.2%) as were Hispanic patients (88.0%, 95% CI = 86.7% to 89.3%) and non-Hispanic Black patients (79.1%, 95% CI = 78.1% to 80.0%) compared with White patients (72.0%, 95% CI = 71.7% to 72.4%). Differences in demographics suggest CoC data may underrepresent some groups, including low-income and rural patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10627003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106270032023-11-07 Assessing characteristics of populations seen at Commission on Cancer facilities using Pennsylvania linked data Reed, Kristine G Sun, Zhaojun Yabes, Jonathan G Drake, Coleman Ober, Nicole Jacobs, Bruce van Londen, G J Bradley, Cathy J Sabik, Lindsay M JNCI Cancer Spectr Brief Communications Commission on Cancer (CoC) accreditation certifies facilities provide quality care. We assessed differences among patients who do and do not visit CoC facilities using Pennsylvania Cancer Registry data linked to facility records for patients diagnosed with cancer between 2018 and 2019 (n = 87 472). Predicted probabilities from multivariable logistic regression indicated patients in the most advantaged Area Deprivation Index quartiles were more likely to visit CoC facilities (78.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 77.5% to 78.6%) compared with other quartiles. Urban patients (74.1%, 95% CI = 73.8% to 74.4%) were more likely than rural to be seen at a CoC facility (62.7%, 95% CI = 61.2% to 64.2%) as were Hispanic patients (88.0%, 95% CI = 86.7% to 89.3%) and non-Hispanic Black patients (79.1%, 95% CI = 78.1% to 80.0%) compared with White patients (72.0%, 95% CI = 71.7% to 72.4%). Differences in demographics suggest CoC data may underrepresent some groups, including low-income and rural patients. Oxford University Press 2023-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10627003/ /pubmed/37788093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad080 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Brief Communications
Reed, Kristine G
Sun, Zhaojun
Yabes, Jonathan G
Drake, Coleman
Ober, Nicole
Jacobs, Bruce
van Londen, G J
Bradley, Cathy J
Sabik, Lindsay M
Assessing characteristics of populations seen at Commission on Cancer facilities using Pennsylvania linked data
title Assessing characteristics of populations seen at Commission on Cancer facilities using Pennsylvania linked data
title_full Assessing characteristics of populations seen at Commission on Cancer facilities using Pennsylvania linked data
title_fullStr Assessing characteristics of populations seen at Commission on Cancer facilities using Pennsylvania linked data
title_full_unstemmed Assessing characteristics of populations seen at Commission on Cancer facilities using Pennsylvania linked data
title_short Assessing characteristics of populations seen at Commission on Cancer facilities using Pennsylvania linked data
title_sort assessing characteristics of populations seen at commission on cancer facilities using pennsylvania linked data
topic Brief Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37788093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad080
work_keys_str_mv AT reedkristineg assessingcharacteristicsofpopulationsseenatcommissiononcancerfacilitiesusingpennsylvanialinkeddata
AT sunzhaojun assessingcharacteristicsofpopulationsseenatcommissiononcancerfacilitiesusingpennsylvanialinkeddata
AT yabesjonathang assessingcharacteristicsofpopulationsseenatcommissiononcancerfacilitiesusingpennsylvanialinkeddata
AT drakecoleman assessingcharacteristicsofpopulationsseenatcommissiononcancerfacilitiesusingpennsylvanialinkeddata
AT obernicole assessingcharacteristicsofpopulationsseenatcommissiononcancerfacilitiesusingpennsylvanialinkeddata
AT jacobsbruce assessingcharacteristicsofpopulationsseenatcommissiononcancerfacilitiesusingpennsylvanialinkeddata
AT vanlondengj assessingcharacteristicsofpopulationsseenatcommissiononcancerfacilitiesusingpennsylvanialinkeddata
AT bradleycathyj assessingcharacteristicsofpopulationsseenatcommissiononcancerfacilitiesusingpennsylvanialinkeddata
AT sabiklindsaym assessingcharacteristicsofpopulationsseenatcommissiononcancerfacilitiesusingpennsylvanialinkeddata