Cargando…

Diagnostic performance of CT scan–based radiomics for prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) scan–based radiomics in prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in gastric cancer (GC) patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for ori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HajiEsmailPoor, Zanyar, Tabnak, Peyman, Baradaran, Behzad, Pashazadeh, Fariba, Aghebati-Maleki, Leili
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1185663
_version_ 1785131498905534464
author HajiEsmailPoor, Zanyar
Tabnak, Peyman
Baradaran, Behzad
Pashazadeh, Fariba
Aghebati-Maleki, Leili
author_facet HajiEsmailPoor, Zanyar
Tabnak, Peyman
Baradaran, Behzad
Pashazadeh, Fariba
Aghebati-Maleki, Leili
author_sort HajiEsmailPoor, Zanyar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) scan–based radiomics in prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in gastric cancer (GC) patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for original studies published until 10 November 2022, and the studies satisfying the inclusion criteria were included. Characteristics of included studies and radiomics approach and data for constructing 2 × 2 tables were extracted. The radiomics quality score (RQS) and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) were utilized for the quality assessment of included studies. Overall sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to assess diagnostic accuracy. The subgroup analysis and Spearman’s correlation coefficient was done for exploration of heterogeneity sources. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with 7,010 GC patients were included. We conducted analyses on both radiomics signature and combined (based on signature and clinical features) models. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC of radiomics models compared to combined models were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67–0.82) versus 0.81 (95% CI, 0.75–0.86), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73–0.86) versus 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79–0.89), 13 (95% CI, 7–23) versus 23 (95% CI, 13–42), and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81–0.86) versus 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87–0.92), respectively. The meta-analysis indicated a significant heterogeneity among studies. The subgroup analysis revealed that arterial phase CT scan, tumoral and nodal regions of interest (ROIs), automatic segmentation, and two-dimensional (2D) ROI could improve diagnostic accuracy compared to venous phase CT scan, tumoral-only ROI, manual segmentation, and 3D ROI, respectively. Overall, the quality of studies was quite acceptable based on both QUADAS-2 and RQS tools. CONCLUSION: CT scan–based radiomics approach has a promising potential for the prediction of LNM in GC patients preoperatively as a non-invasive diagnostic tool. Methodological heterogeneity is the main limitation of the included studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/Prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=287676, identifier CRD42022287676.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10627242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106272422023-11-07 Diagnostic performance of CT scan–based radiomics for prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis HajiEsmailPoor, Zanyar Tabnak, Peyman Baradaran, Behzad Pashazadeh, Fariba Aghebati-Maleki, Leili Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) scan–based radiomics in prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in gastric cancer (GC) patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for original studies published until 10 November 2022, and the studies satisfying the inclusion criteria were included. Characteristics of included studies and radiomics approach and data for constructing 2 × 2 tables were extracted. The radiomics quality score (RQS) and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) were utilized for the quality assessment of included studies. Overall sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to assess diagnostic accuracy. The subgroup analysis and Spearman’s correlation coefficient was done for exploration of heterogeneity sources. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with 7,010 GC patients were included. We conducted analyses on both radiomics signature and combined (based on signature and clinical features) models. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC of radiomics models compared to combined models were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67–0.82) versus 0.81 (95% CI, 0.75–0.86), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73–0.86) versus 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79–0.89), 13 (95% CI, 7–23) versus 23 (95% CI, 13–42), and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81–0.86) versus 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87–0.92), respectively. The meta-analysis indicated a significant heterogeneity among studies. The subgroup analysis revealed that arterial phase CT scan, tumoral and nodal regions of interest (ROIs), automatic segmentation, and two-dimensional (2D) ROI could improve diagnostic accuracy compared to venous phase CT scan, tumoral-only ROI, manual segmentation, and 3D ROI, respectively. Overall, the quality of studies was quite acceptable based on both QUADAS-2 and RQS tools. CONCLUSION: CT scan–based radiomics approach has a promising potential for the prediction of LNM in GC patients preoperatively as a non-invasive diagnostic tool. Methodological heterogeneity is the main limitation of the included studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/Prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=287676, identifier CRD42022287676. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10627242/ /pubmed/37936604 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1185663 Text en Copyright © 2023 HajiEsmailPoor, Tabnak, Baradaran, Pashazadeh and Aghebati-Maleki https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
HajiEsmailPoor, Zanyar
Tabnak, Peyman
Baradaran, Behzad
Pashazadeh, Fariba
Aghebati-Maleki, Leili
Diagnostic performance of CT scan–based radiomics for prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnostic performance of CT scan–based radiomics for prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic performance of CT scan–based radiomics for prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of CT scan–based radiomics for prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of CT scan–based radiomics for prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic performance of CT scan–based radiomics for prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic performance of ct scan–based radiomics for prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1185663
work_keys_str_mv AT hajiesmailpoorzanyar diagnosticperformanceofctscanbasedradiomicsforpredictionoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tabnakpeyman diagnosticperformanceofctscanbasedradiomicsforpredictionoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baradaranbehzad diagnosticperformanceofctscanbasedradiomicsforpredictionoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pashazadehfariba diagnosticperformanceofctscanbasedradiomicsforpredictionoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aghebatimalekileili diagnosticperformanceofctscanbasedradiomicsforpredictionoflymphnodemetastasisingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis