Cargando…

Oritavancin vs Standard of Care for Treatment of Nonendovascular Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections

BACKGROUND: Data is limited comparing oritavancin (ORT) to the standard-of-care (SOC) for the treatment gram-positive blood stream infections (BSI). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all patients in the Veteran's Affairs Health Care System treated with at least 1 dose of oritavancin or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moenster, Ryan P, Wallace-Lacey, Ashleigh, Western, Hannah, Tiefenaur, Seth, Abdulbasir, Anosha, Alberts, Justin, Doty, Jonathan, Abner, Hartley, Skouby, Danielle, Lorenz, Michael, Fong, Rebecca, Arora, Jyoti, Linneman, Travis W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad411
_version_ 1785131512986861568
author Moenster, Ryan P
Wallace-Lacey, Ashleigh
Western, Hannah
Tiefenaur, Seth
Abdulbasir, Anosha
Alberts, Justin
Doty, Jonathan
Abner, Hartley
Skouby, Danielle
Lorenz, Michael
Fong, Rebecca
Arora, Jyoti
Linneman, Travis W
author_facet Moenster, Ryan P
Wallace-Lacey, Ashleigh
Western, Hannah
Tiefenaur, Seth
Abdulbasir, Anosha
Alberts, Justin
Doty, Jonathan
Abner, Hartley
Skouby, Danielle
Lorenz, Michael
Fong, Rebecca
Arora, Jyoti
Linneman, Travis W
author_sort Moenster, Ryan P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data is limited comparing oritavancin (ORT) to the standard-of-care (SOC) for the treatment gram-positive blood stream infections (BSI). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all patients in the Veteran's Affairs Health Care System treated with at least 1 dose of oritavancin or at least 5 days of vancomycin, daptomycin, ceftaroline, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, nafcillin, oxacillin, or cefazolin for a documented gram-positive BSI from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2021. Patients with polymicrobial blood cultures or positive cultures from other sites were included if the organisms were sensitive to the incident antimicrobial; no concomitant antimicrobials could be used once the incident agent was started. Individuals were also excluded if they were diagnosed with endocarditis, had a neutrophil count 96-hours of treatment before the incident antimicrobial was started. The primary composite outcome was clinical failure, defined as all-cause mortality within 30-days from the end of therapy, or blood cultures positive for the incident organisms ≥72 hours after administration of the first dose and ≤30 days after the administration of the final dose of the study antimicrobial, or any drug or line-related readmissions within 30-days of hospital discharge. RESULTS: Two hundred-forty patients were identified for screening with 96 meeting criteria (27 in ORT and 69 in SOC groups). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between groups except more patients in the ORT group received >96-hours of treatment before the incident antimicrobial was started (70.3% (19/27) vs 13.04% 9/69); P < .001). The pathogen most prevalent was methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (ORT 33.3% (9/27) vs SOC 46.4% (32/69)). Clinical failure occurred in 7.4% (2/27) in the ORT group and 17.4% (12/69) in SOC (P = .34). No components of the primary outcome were significantly different between groups, but AKI did occur more commonly in the SOC group (27.5% (19/69) vs 3.7% (1/27); P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: ORT appears to be a safe and effective option when directly compared to the SOC for non-endocarditis BSIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10627338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106273382023-11-07 Oritavancin vs Standard of Care for Treatment of Nonendovascular Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections Moenster, Ryan P Wallace-Lacey, Ashleigh Western, Hannah Tiefenaur, Seth Abdulbasir, Anosha Alberts, Justin Doty, Jonathan Abner, Hartley Skouby, Danielle Lorenz, Michael Fong, Rebecca Arora, Jyoti Linneman, Travis W Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Data is limited comparing oritavancin (ORT) to the standard-of-care (SOC) for the treatment gram-positive blood stream infections (BSI). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all patients in the Veteran's Affairs Health Care System treated with at least 1 dose of oritavancin or at least 5 days of vancomycin, daptomycin, ceftaroline, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, nafcillin, oxacillin, or cefazolin for a documented gram-positive BSI from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2021. Patients with polymicrobial blood cultures or positive cultures from other sites were included if the organisms were sensitive to the incident antimicrobial; no concomitant antimicrobials could be used once the incident agent was started. Individuals were also excluded if they were diagnosed with endocarditis, had a neutrophil count 96-hours of treatment before the incident antimicrobial was started. The primary composite outcome was clinical failure, defined as all-cause mortality within 30-days from the end of therapy, or blood cultures positive for the incident organisms ≥72 hours after administration of the first dose and ≤30 days after the administration of the final dose of the study antimicrobial, or any drug or line-related readmissions within 30-days of hospital discharge. RESULTS: Two hundred-forty patients were identified for screening with 96 meeting criteria (27 in ORT and 69 in SOC groups). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between groups except more patients in the ORT group received >96-hours of treatment before the incident antimicrobial was started (70.3% (19/27) vs 13.04% 9/69); P < .001). The pathogen most prevalent was methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (ORT 33.3% (9/27) vs SOC 46.4% (32/69)). Clinical failure occurred in 7.4% (2/27) in the ORT group and 17.4% (12/69) in SOC (P = .34). No components of the primary outcome were significantly different between groups, but AKI did occur more commonly in the SOC group (27.5% (19/69) vs 3.7% (1/27); P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: ORT appears to be a safe and effective option when directly compared to the SOC for non-endocarditis BSIs. Oxford University Press 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10627338/ /pubmed/37937043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad411 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Article
Moenster, Ryan P
Wallace-Lacey, Ashleigh
Western, Hannah
Tiefenaur, Seth
Abdulbasir, Anosha
Alberts, Justin
Doty, Jonathan
Abner, Hartley
Skouby, Danielle
Lorenz, Michael
Fong, Rebecca
Arora, Jyoti
Linneman, Travis W
Oritavancin vs Standard of Care for Treatment of Nonendovascular Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections
title Oritavancin vs Standard of Care for Treatment of Nonendovascular Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections
title_full Oritavancin vs Standard of Care for Treatment of Nonendovascular Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections
title_fullStr Oritavancin vs Standard of Care for Treatment of Nonendovascular Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections
title_full_unstemmed Oritavancin vs Standard of Care for Treatment of Nonendovascular Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections
title_short Oritavancin vs Standard of Care for Treatment of Nonendovascular Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections
title_sort oritavancin vs standard of care for treatment of nonendovascular gram-positive bloodstream infections
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad411
work_keys_str_mv AT moensterryanp oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections
AT wallacelaceyashleigh oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections
AT westernhannah oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections
AT tiefenaurseth oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections
AT abdulbasiranosha oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections
AT albertsjustin oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections
AT dotyjonathan oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections
AT abnerhartley oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections
AT skoubydanielle oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections
AT lorenzmichael oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections
AT fongrebecca oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections
AT arorajyoti oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections
AT linnemantravisw oritavancinvsstandardofcarefortreatmentofnonendovasculargrampositivebloodstreaminfections