Cargando…
Evidence quality assessment of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection intervention coronary heart disease angina pectoris: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
BACKGROUND: Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection (STS) is widely used in the clinical treatment of coronary heart disease angina pectoris (CHDAP). This article systematically summarizes and evaluates the available evidence for STS in the treatment of AP, and assess its quality. METHODS: Two res...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37933033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035509 |
_version_ | 1785131573934292992 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Lufeng Fan, Maoxia Li, Junhai Chen, Wenqiang |
author_facet | Peng, Lufeng Fan, Maoxia Li, Junhai Chen, Wenqiang |
author_sort | Peng, Lufeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection (STS) is widely used in the clinical treatment of coronary heart disease angina pectoris (CHDAP). This article systematically summarizes and evaluates the available evidence for STS in the treatment of AP, and assess its quality. METHODS: Two researchers searched and extracted 8 databases for systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs), and independently assessed the methodological quality, risk of bias, reporting quality, and quality of evidence of SRs/MAs included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Tools used included the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), the risk of bias in systematic (ROBIS) scale, the list of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: This overview includes 11 SRs/MAs that use quantitative calculations to comprehensively evaluate various efficacies of STS in AP intervention. The methodological quality, reporting quality, risk of bias, and quality of evidence for outcome measures of SRs/MAs were all unsatisfactory. All SRs/MAs are of low quality according to the results of the AMSTAR-2 assessment, and only a small number of SRs/MAs were assessed as low risk of bias based on the results of the ROBIS assessment, and none of the SRs/MAs has been fully reported on the checklist. According to GRADE system, 33 outcomes were extracted from the included SRs/MAs for evaluation, of which 12 were rated as moderate-quality evidence, 7 as low-quality evidence, and 14 as very low-quality evidence. Limitations included the lack of essential items such as protocol registration, screening of duplicate studies, provision of a list of excluded studies and assessment of publication bias. CONCLUSION: Tanshinone IIA Sulfonate Sodium Injection may be an effective and safe treatment method. However, further standardized, comprehensive SRs/MAs and RCTs are needed to provide evidence-based medical support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10627678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106276782023-11-07 Evidence quality assessment of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection intervention coronary heart disease angina pectoris: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses Peng, Lufeng Fan, Maoxia Li, Junhai Chen, Wenqiang Medicine (Baltimore) 3400 BACKGROUND: Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection (STS) is widely used in the clinical treatment of coronary heart disease angina pectoris (CHDAP). This article systematically summarizes and evaluates the available evidence for STS in the treatment of AP, and assess its quality. METHODS: Two researchers searched and extracted 8 databases for systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs), and independently assessed the methodological quality, risk of bias, reporting quality, and quality of evidence of SRs/MAs included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Tools used included the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), the risk of bias in systematic (ROBIS) scale, the list of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: This overview includes 11 SRs/MAs that use quantitative calculations to comprehensively evaluate various efficacies of STS in AP intervention. The methodological quality, reporting quality, risk of bias, and quality of evidence for outcome measures of SRs/MAs were all unsatisfactory. All SRs/MAs are of low quality according to the results of the AMSTAR-2 assessment, and only a small number of SRs/MAs were assessed as low risk of bias based on the results of the ROBIS assessment, and none of the SRs/MAs has been fully reported on the checklist. According to GRADE system, 33 outcomes were extracted from the included SRs/MAs for evaluation, of which 12 were rated as moderate-quality evidence, 7 as low-quality evidence, and 14 as very low-quality evidence. Limitations included the lack of essential items such as protocol registration, screening of duplicate studies, provision of a list of excluded studies and assessment of publication bias. CONCLUSION: Tanshinone IIA Sulfonate Sodium Injection may be an effective and safe treatment method. However, further standardized, comprehensive SRs/MAs and RCTs are needed to provide evidence-based medical support. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10627678/ /pubmed/37933033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035509 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 3400 Peng, Lufeng Fan, Maoxia Li, Junhai Chen, Wenqiang Evidence quality assessment of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection intervention coronary heart disease angina pectoris: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
title | Evidence quality assessment of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection intervention coronary heart disease angina pectoris: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
title_full | Evidence quality assessment of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection intervention coronary heart disease angina pectoris: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
title_fullStr | Evidence quality assessment of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection intervention coronary heart disease angina pectoris: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence quality assessment of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection intervention coronary heart disease angina pectoris: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
title_short | Evidence quality assessment of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate injection intervention coronary heart disease angina pectoris: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
title_sort | evidence quality assessment of sodium tanshinone iia sulfonate injection intervention coronary heart disease angina pectoris: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
topic | 3400 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37933033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penglufeng evidencequalityassessmentofsodiumtanshinoneiiasulfonateinjectioninterventioncoronaryheartdiseaseanginapectorisanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses AT fanmaoxia evidencequalityassessmentofsodiumtanshinoneiiasulfonateinjectioninterventioncoronaryheartdiseaseanginapectorisanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses AT lijunhai evidencequalityassessmentofsodiumtanshinoneiiasulfonateinjectioninterventioncoronaryheartdiseaseanginapectorisanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses AT chenwenqiang evidencequalityassessmentofsodiumtanshinoneiiasulfonateinjectioninterventioncoronaryheartdiseaseanginapectorisanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses |