Cargando…

The risk of lymph node metastasis in the new FIGO 2018 stage IA cervical cancer with >7 mm diameter

OBJECTIVE: In the 2018 FIGO staging system, cervical cancers with ≤5 mm depth of invasion (DOI) and a diameter of >7 mm, first classified as stage IB, are classified as stage IA. In this group, it is unclear what the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is. This retrospective cohort study aims to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Nicolai, Laure, Yigit, Refika, Bleeker, Maaike C.G., Bart, Joost, van der Velden, Jacobus, Mom, Constantijne H.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37477098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e75

Ejemplares similares

The prognostic value of the number of positive lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio in early‐stage cervical cancer
por: Olthof, Ester P., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Tailoring radicality in early cervical cancer: how far can we go?
por: van der Velden, Jacobus, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reviewing FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging
por: Soares, Leila Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Treatment of bulky lymph nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer: boosting versus debulking
por: Olthof, Ester Paulien, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes on Prognosis in FIGO Stage IA1-IIA2 Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Primary Radical Surgery
por: Jiang, Shan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

자궁경부암: 개정된 2018 FIGO 병기와 자기공명영상을 중심으로
Publicado: (2021)

Critical analysis of the FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging
por: Soares, Leila Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Data from small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: FIGO 2018 staging is more accurate than FIGO 2009
por: Zhang, Yunqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Should the Number of Metastatic Pelvic Lymph Nodes Be Integrated into the 2018 Figo Staging Classification of Early Stage Cervical Cancer?
por: Pedone Anchora, Luigi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Survival Outcomes in Patients With 2018 FIGO Stage IA2–IIA2 Cervical Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy: A Propensity Score-Weighting Analysis
por: Zhao, Wancheng, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Fertility-Sparing Approach in Patients with Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer Grade 2 Stage IA (FIGO): A Qualitative Systematic Review
por: Giampaolino, Pierluigi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A 39 mm Diameter Jejunal Artery Aneurysm
por: Gogeneata, Ioan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Multidisciplinary perspectives on newly revised 2018 FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri
por: Berek, Jonathan S., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A comprehensive analysis of the factors of positive pelvic lymph nodes on survival of cervical cancer patients with 2018 FIGO stage IIIC1p
por: Yan, Ding-Ding, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Manufacture of 195 mm and 250 mm diameter finish machined vacuum flanges for the PS machine
Publicado: (1985)

Non-invasive detection of endometrial cancer by DNA methylation analysis in urine
por: van den Helder, Rianne, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Five-year disease-free survival in FIGO IA stage endometrial cancer patients: Tertiary institution experience in a developing country
por: Radojević, Marija Živković, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Technical specification for the supply of 195 mm and 250 mm diameter vacuum flange blanks for the PS machine
Publicado: (1985)

Differences in the clinical characteristics of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma located in the isthmus ≤5 mm and >5mm in diameter
por: Zhu, Feng, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Longitudinal impedance of the 100 mm diameter vacuum valve in EPA
por: Caspers, F, et al.
Publicado: (1986)

Imaging in Carcinoma Cervix and Revised 2018 FIGO Staging System: Implications in Radiology Reporting
por: Dhamija, Ekta, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018)
por: Chen, Xiaolin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors
por: Ye, Yanna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prognostic effect of different PD-L1 expression patterns in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix
por: Heeren, A Marijne, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How Well Can We Collect Antiprotons with a Big Horn(60mm in Diameter) and a Small Lithium Lens(20mm in Diameter) in the ACOL Dogleg?
por: Maury, S
Publicado: (1985)

How well can we collect antiprotons with a big horn (60 MM in diameter) and a small lithium lens (20 MM in diameter) in the ACOL dogleg ?
por: Maury, S
Publicado: (1985)

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Vaginal Radical Trachelectomy as Fertility‐Preserving Treatment for Patients with FIGO 2018 Stage 1B2 Cervical Cancer
por: Zusterzeel, Petra L.M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with FIGO II to III Squamous Cell Cervical Carcinoma Under Radical Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis Based on 2018 FIGO Staging
por: Zang, Lele, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors
por: Yan, Ding-Ding, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review
por: Qin, Fengying, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer
por: Long, Xingtao, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Sealing vessels up to 7 mm in diameter solely with ultrasonic technology
por: Timm, Richard W, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Indications and outcomes of keratoplasty ≤ 5.5 mm diameter (“mini-keratoplasty”)
por: Fathai, Hila, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

FDG uptake heterogeneity in FIGO IIb cervical carcinoma does not predict pelvic lymph node involvement
por: Brooks, Frank J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Risk Factor Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer
por: Xu, Mu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System
por: Liu, Xiaoliang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
por: Li, Zhiqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
por: Wagner-Larsen, Kari S., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Does the New FIGO 2018 Staging System Allow Better Prognostic Differentiation in Early Stage Cervical Cancer? A Dutch Nationwide Cohort Study
por: Ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Retrospective clinical study of ultrawide implants more than 6 mm in diameter
por: Ku, Jeong-Kui, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_jbjchs3evfnc0vkkude1blt1dr