Cargando…

Betting on Australian Rules Football: Can Expert Tipsters beat Randomness?

Betting on the various codes of football in Australia accounts for the majority of sports betting, with Australian rules football (AFL) by far the most popular sport in Australia. Several studies have revealed the heavy presence of gambling advertising during AFL broadcasts, and a frequently used ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riley, Ben J., Li, Lee, Plevin, David, Baigent, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37544961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-023-10244-9
_version_ 1785131625055518720
author Riley, Ben J.
Li, Lee
Plevin, David
Baigent, Michael
author_facet Riley, Ben J.
Li, Lee
Plevin, David
Baigent, Michael
author_sort Riley, Ben J.
collection PubMed
description Betting on the various codes of football in Australia accounts for the majority of sports betting, with Australian rules football (AFL) by far the most popular sport in Australia. Several studies have revealed the heavy presence of gambling advertising during AFL broadcasts, and a frequently used advertising strategy involves the use of well-known AFL commentators outlining their tips and betting suggestions. To date, no research has examined the hypotheses that skill may help in predicting AFL matches and monetary outcomes from AFL betting. Rather than merely discounting such ideas, it is important to test them empirically. The aims of this study were therefore, to examine if (1) expert AFL tipsters made better predictions than random picks, (2) expert AFL tipsters gained greater monetary reward than random selection, and (3) expert tipsters’ prediction accuracy improved with betting experience. To this end, six seasons of AFL matches, odds data, and expert tipster data were analysed retrospectively, totalling 1141 matches. Random selections were calculated for each match using an inbuilt random number generator within Microsoft Excel and a $2 simulated wager was applied for each AFL match. The results of mixed-effects modelling showed that experts picked more correct outcomes than random selection; experts’ correct predictions were partially mediated by home-game selections; no difference in monetary outcome was observed for experts compared to random selection; experts’ predictions did not improve over time. The results of this study may be used to inform both psychological interventions that target gamblers’ illusions of control, and public health gambling harm prevention messaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10627876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106278762023-11-08 Betting on Australian Rules Football: Can Expert Tipsters beat Randomness? Riley, Ben J. Li, Lee Plevin, David Baigent, Michael J Gambl Stud Original Paper Betting on the various codes of football in Australia accounts for the majority of sports betting, with Australian rules football (AFL) by far the most popular sport in Australia. Several studies have revealed the heavy presence of gambling advertising during AFL broadcasts, and a frequently used advertising strategy involves the use of well-known AFL commentators outlining their tips and betting suggestions. To date, no research has examined the hypotheses that skill may help in predicting AFL matches and monetary outcomes from AFL betting. Rather than merely discounting such ideas, it is important to test them empirically. The aims of this study were therefore, to examine if (1) expert AFL tipsters made better predictions than random picks, (2) expert AFL tipsters gained greater monetary reward than random selection, and (3) expert tipsters’ prediction accuracy improved with betting experience. To this end, six seasons of AFL matches, odds data, and expert tipster data were analysed retrospectively, totalling 1141 matches. Random selections were calculated for each match using an inbuilt random number generator within Microsoft Excel and a $2 simulated wager was applied for each AFL match. The results of mixed-effects modelling showed that experts picked more correct outcomes than random selection; experts’ correct predictions were partially mediated by home-game selections; no difference in monetary outcome was observed for experts compared to random selection; experts’ predictions did not improve over time. The results of this study may be used to inform both psychological interventions that target gamblers’ illusions of control, and public health gambling harm prevention messaging. Springer US 2023-08-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10627876/ /pubmed/37544961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-023-10244-9 Text en © Crown 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Riley, Ben J.
Li, Lee
Plevin, David
Baigent, Michael
Betting on Australian Rules Football: Can Expert Tipsters beat Randomness?
title Betting on Australian Rules Football: Can Expert Tipsters beat Randomness?
title_full Betting on Australian Rules Football: Can Expert Tipsters beat Randomness?
title_fullStr Betting on Australian Rules Football: Can Expert Tipsters beat Randomness?
title_full_unstemmed Betting on Australian Rules Football: Can Expert Tipsters beat Randomness?
title_short Betting on Australian Rules Football: Can Expert Tipsters beat Randomness?
title_sort betting on australian rules football: can expert tipsters beat randomness?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37544961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-023-10244-9
work_keys_str_mv AT rileybenj bettingonaustralianrulesfootballcanexperttipstersbeatrandomness
AT lilee bettingonaustralianrulesfootballcanexperttipstersbeatrandomness
AT plevindavid bettingonaustralianrulesfootballcanexperttipstersbeatrandomness
AT baigentmichael bettingonaustralianrulesfootballcanexperttipstersbeatrandomness