Cargando…

Identifying the severity of diabetic retinopathy by visual function measures using both traditional statistical methods and interpretable machine learning: a cross-sectional study

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the extent to which diabetic retinopathy severity stage may be classified using machine learning (ML) and commonly used clinical measures of visual function together with age and sex. METHODS: We measured the visual function of 1901 eyes from 1032 participants in the No...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wright, David M., Chakravarthy, Usha, Das, Radha, Graham, Katie W., Naskas, Timos T., Perais, Jennifer, Kee, Frank, Peto, Tunde, Hogg, Ruth E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37725107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-06005-3
_version_ 1785131631936274432
author Wright, David M.
Chakravarthy, Usha
Das, Radha
Graham, Katie W.
Naskas, Timos T.
Perais, Jennifer
Kee, Frank
Peto, Tunde
Hogg, Ruth E.
author_facet Wright, David M.
Chakravarthy, Usha
Das, Radha
Graham, Katie W.
Naskas, Timos T.
Perais, Jennifer
Kee, Frank
Peto, Tunde
Hogg, Ruth E.
author_sort Wright, David M.
collection PubMed
description AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the extent to which diabetic retinopathy severity stage may be classified using machine learning (ML) and commonly used clinical measures of visual function together with age and sex. METHODS: We measured the visual function of 1901 eyes from 1032 participants in the Northern Ireland Sensory Ageing Study, deriving 12 variables from nine visual function tests. Missing values were imputed using chained equations. Participants were divided into four groups using clinical measures and grading of ophthalmic images: no diabetes mellitus (no DM), diabetes but no diabetic retinopathy (DM no DR), diabetic retinopathy without diabetic macular oedema (DR no DMO) and diabetic retinopathy with DMO (DR with DMO). Ensemble ML models were fitted to classify group membership for three tasks, distinguishing (A) the DM no DR group from the no DM group; (B) the DR no DMO group from the DM no DR group; and (C) the DR with DMO group from the DR no DMO group. More conventional multiple logistic regression models were also fitted for comparison. An interpretable ML technique was used to rank the contribution of visual function variables to predictions and to disentangle associations between diabetic eye disease and visual function from artefacts of the data collection process. RESULTS: The performance of the ensemble ML models was good across all three classification tasks, with accuracies of 0.92, 1.00 and 0.84, respectively, for tasks A–C, substantially exceeding the accuracies for logistic regression (0.84, 0.61 and 0.80, respectively). Reading index was highly ranked for tasks A and B, whereas near visual acuity and Moorfields chart acuity were important for task C. Microperimetry variables ranked highly for all three tasks, but this was partly due to a data artefact (a large proportion of missing values). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Ensemble ML models predicted status of diabetic eye disease with high accuracy using just age, sex and measures of visual function. Interpretable ML methods enabled us to identify profiles of visual function associated with different stages of diabetic eye disease, and to disentangle associations from artefacts of the data collection process. Together, these two techniques have great potential for developing prediction models using untidy real-world clinical data. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00125-023-06005-3) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10627908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106279082023-11-08 Identifying the severity of diabetic retinopathy by visual function measures using both traditional statistical methods and interpretable machine learning: a cross-sectional study Wright, David M. Chakravarthy, Usha Das, Radha Graham, Katie W. Naskas, Timos T. Perais, Jennifer Kee, Frank Peto, Tunde Hogg, Ruth E. Diabetologia Article AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the extent to which diabetic retinopathy severity stage may be classified using machine learning (ML) and commonly used clinical measures of visual function together with age and sex. METHODS: We measured the visual function of 1901 eyes from 1032 participants in the Northern Ireland Sensory Ageing Study, deriving 12 variables from nine visual function tests. Missing values were imputed using chained equations. Participants were divided into four groups using clinical measures and grading of ophthalmic images: no diabetes mellitus (no DM), diabetes but no diabetic retinopathy (DM no DR), diabetic retinopathy without diabetic macular oedema (DR no DMO) and diabetic retinopathy with DMO (DR with DMO). Ensemble ML models were fitted to classify group membership for three tasks, distinguishing (A) the DM no DR group from the no DM group; (B) the DR no DMO group from the DM no DR group; and (C) the DR with DMO group from the DR no DMO group. More conventional multiple logistic regression models were also fitted for comparison. An interpretable ML technique was used to rank the contribution of visual function variables to predictions and to disentangle associations between diabetic eye disease and visual function from artefacts of the data collection process. RESULTS: The performance of the ensemble ML models was good across all three classification tasks, with accuracies of 0.92, 1.00 and 0.84, respectively, for tasks A–C, substantially exceeding the accuracies for logistic regression (0.84, 0.61 and 0.80, respectively). Reading index was highly ranked for tasks A and B, whereas near visual acuity and Moorfields chart acuity were important for task C. Microperimetry variables ranked highly for all three tasks, but this was partly due to a data artefact (a large proportion of missing values). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Ensemble ML models predicted status of diabetic eye disease with high accuracy using just age, sex and measures of visual function. Interpretable ML methods enabled us to identify profiles of visual function associated with different stages of diabetic eye disease, and to disentangle associations from artefacts of the data collection process. Together, these two techniques have great potential for developing prediction models using untidy real-world clinical data. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00125-023-06005-3) contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-19 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10627908/ /pubmed/37725107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-06005-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wright, David M.
Chakravarthy, Usha
Das, Radha
Graham, Katie W.
Naskas, Timos T.
Perais, Jennifer
Kee, Frank
Peto, Tunde
Hogg, Ruth E.
Identifying the severity of diabetic retinopathy by visual function measures using both traditional statistical methods and interpretable machine learning: a cross-sectional study
title Identifying the severity of diabetic retinopathy by visual function measures using both traditional statistical methods and interpretable machine learning: a cross-sectional study
title_full Identifying the severity of diabetic retinopathy by visual function measures using both traditional statistical methods and interpretable machine learning: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Identifying the severity of diabetic retinopathy by visual function measures using both traditional statistical methods and interpretable machine learning: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Identifying the severity of diabetic retinopathy by visual function measures using both traditional statistical methods and interpretable machine learning: a cross-sectional study
title_short Identifying the severity of diabetic retinopathy by visual function measures using both traditional statistical methods and interpretable machine learning: a cross-sectional study
title_sort identifying the severity of diabetic retinopathy by visual function measures using both traditional statistical methods and interpretable machine learning: a cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37725107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-06005-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wrightdavidm identifyingtheseverityofdiabeticretinopathybyvisualfunctionmeasuresusingbothtraditionalstatisticalmethodsandinterpretablemachinelearningacrosssectionalstudy
AT chakravarthyusha identifyingtheseverityofdiabeticretinopathybyvisualfunctionmeasuresusingbothtraditionalstatisticalmethodsandinterpretablemachinelearningacrosssectionalstudy
AT dasradha identifyingtheseverityofdiabeticretinopathybyvisualfunctionmeasuresusingbothtraditionalstatisticalmethodsandinterpretablemachinelearningacrosssectionalstudy
AT grahamkatiew identifyingtheseverityofdiabeticretinopathybyvisualfunctionmeasuresusingbothtraditionalstatisticalmethodsandinterpretablemachinelearningacrosssectionalstudy
AT naskastimost identifyingtheseverityofdiabeticretinopathybyvisualfunctionmeasuresusingbothtraditionalstatisticalmethodsandinterpretablemachinelearningacrosssectionalstudy
AT peraisjennifer identifyingtheseverityofdiabeticretinopathybyvisualfunctionmeasuresusingbothtraditionalstatisticalmethodsandinterpretablemachinelearningacrosssectionalstudy
AT keefrank identifyingtheseverityofdiabeticretinopathybyvisualfunctionmeasuresusingbothtraditionalstatisticalmethodsandinterpretablemachinelearningacrosssectionalstudy
AT petotunde identifyingtheseverityofdiabeticretinopathybyvisualfunctionmeasuresusingbothtraditionalstatisticalmethodsandinterpretablemachinelearningacrosssectionalstudy
AT hoggruthe identifyingtheseverityofdiabeticretinopathybyvisualfunctionmeasuresusingbothtraditionalstatisticalmethodsandinterpretablemachinelearningacrosssectionalstudy