Cargando…

Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study

INTRODUCTION: Transformations in the work–nonwork interface highlight the importance of effectively managing the boundaries between life domains. However, do the ways individuals manage the boundaries between work and nonwork life change from one day to the next? If so, which antecedents may explain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mueller, Nicolas, Loeffelsend, Sophia, Vater, Elke, Kempen, Regina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941752
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149969
_version_ 1785131666922012672
author Mueller, Nicolas
Loeffelsend, Sophia
Vater, Elke
Kempen, Regina
author_facet Mueller, Nicolas
Loeffelsend, Sophia
Vater, Elke
Kempen, Regina
author_sort Mueller, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Transformations in the work–nonwork interface highlight the importance of effectively managing the boundaries between life domains. However, do the ways individuals manage the boundaries between work and nonwork life change from one day to the next? If so, which antecedents may explain these intra-individual fluctuations in boundary management? Drawing on boundary management, spillover, and resource theories, we investigate daily changes in segmentation preferences and integration enactments as a function of experiencing strain in work and nonwork life. Assuming that changes in segmentation preferences reflect an individual’s strategy to regulate negative cross-role spillover, we suppose that strain increases individuals’ segmentation preferences; at the same time, however, it could force individuals to enact more integration. METHODS: We test our assumptions with data from two studies with different methodological approaches. The first study uses a daily diary research design (Study 1, 425 participants with 3,238 daily observations) in which full-time professionals rated strain in work and nonwork life, segmentation preferences, and integration enactments every evening for 10 workdays. The second study uses an experimental vignette research design (Study 2, 181 participants), where we experimentally manipulated strain in work and nonwork life and investigated causal effects on participants’ hypothetical segmentation preferences. RESULTS: The results of multilevel modeling analyses in Study 1 show that segmentation preferences and integration enactments fluctuate from day to day as a function of strain. More specifically, strain is related to preferring more segmentation but enacting more integration. Study 2 replicates the results of Study 1, showing that strain causally affects segmentation preferences. DISCUSSION: This two-study paper is one of the first to address daily fluctuations in segmentation preferences and integration enactments, extending our knowledge of temporal dynamics in boundary management. Furthermore, it demonstrates that strain is an antecedent of these daily fluctuations, offering starting points for practical interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10628038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106280382023-11-08 Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study Mueller, Nicolas Loeffelsend, Sophia Vater, Elke Kempen, Regina Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: Transformations in the work–nonwork interface highlight the importance of effectively managing the boundaries between life domains. However, do the ways individuals manage the boundaries between work and nonwork life change from one day to the next? If so, which antecedents may explain these intra-individual fluctuations in boundary management? Drawing on boundary management, spillover, and resource theories, we investigate daily changes in segmentation preferences and integration enactments as a function of experiencing strain in work and nonwork life. Assuming that changes in segmentation preferences reflect an individual’s strategy to regulate negative cross-role spillover, we suppose that strain increases individuals’ segmentation preferences; at the same time, however, it could force individuals to enact more integration. METHODS: We test our assumptions with data from two studies with different methodological approaches. The first study uses a daily diary research design (Study 1, 425 participants with 3,238 daily observations) in which full-time professionals rated strain in work and nonwork life, segmentation preferences, and integration enactments every evening for 10 workdays. The second study uses an experimental vignette research design (Study 2, 181 participants), where we experimentally manipulated strain in work and nonwork life and investigated causal effects on participants’ hypothetical segmentation preferences. RESULTS: The results of multilevel modeling analyses in Study 1 show that segmentation preferences and integration enactments fluctuate from day to day as a function of strain. More specifically, strain is related to preferring more segmentation but enacting more integration. Study 2 replicates the results of Study 1, showing that strain causally affects segmentation preferences. DISCUSSION: This two-study paper is one of the first to address daily fluctuations in segmentation preferences and integration enactments, extending our knowledge of temporal dynamics in boundary management. Furthermore, it demonstrates that strain is an antecedent of these daily fluctuations, offering starting points for practical interventions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10628038/ /pubmed/37941752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149969 Text en Copyright © 2023 Mueller, Loeffelsend, Vater and Kempen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Mueller, Nicolas
Loeffelsend, Sophia
Vater, Elke
Kempen, Regina
Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study
title Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study
title_full Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study
title_fullStr Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study
title_short Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study
title_sort effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941752
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149969
work_keys_str_mv AT muellernicolas effectsofstrainonboundarymanagementfindingsfromadailydiarystudyandanexperimentalvignettestudy
AT loeffelsendsophia effectsofstrainonboundarymanagementfindingsfromadailydiarystudyandanexperimentalvignettestudy
AT vaterelke effectsofstrainonboundarymanagementfindingsfromadailydiarystudyandanexperimentalvignettestudy
AT kempenregina effectsofstrainonboundarymanagementfindingsfromadailydiarystudyandanexperimentalvignettestudy