Cargando…
Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study
INTRODUCTION: Transformations in the work–nonwork interface highlight the importance of effectively managing the boundaries between life domains. However, do the ways individuals manage the boundaries between work and nonwork life change from one day to the next? If so, which antecedents may explain...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149969 |
_version_ | 1785131666922012672 |
---|---|
author | Mueller, Nicolas Loeffelsend, Sophia Vater, Elke Kempen, Regina |
author_facet | Mueller, Nicolas Loeffelsend, Sophia Vater, Elke Kempen, Regina |
author_sort | Mueller, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Transformations in the work–nonwork interface highlight the importance of effectively managing the boundaries between life domains. However, do the ways individuals manage the boundaries between work and nonwork life change from one day to the next? If so, which antecedents may explain these intra-individual fluctuations in boundary management? Drawing on boundary management, spillover, and resource theories, we investigate daily changes in segmentation preferences and integration enactments as a function of experiencing strain in work and nonwork life. Assuming that changes in segmentation preferences reflect an individual’s strategy to regulate negative cross-role spillover, we suppose that strain increases individuals’ segmentation preferences; at the same time, however, it could force individuals to enact more integration. METHODS: We test our assumptions with data from two studies with different methodological approaches. The first study uses a daily diary research design (Study 1, 425 participants with 3,238 daily observations) in which full-time professionals rated strain in work and nonwork life, segmentation preferences, and integration enactments every evening for 10 workdays. The second study uses an experimental vignette research design (Study 2, 181 participants), where we experimentally manipulated strain in work and nonwork life and investigated causal effects on participants’ hypothetical segmentation preferences. RESULTS: The results of multilevel modeling analyses in Study 1 show that segmentation preferences and integration enactments fluctuate from day to day as a function of strain. More specifically, strain is related to preferring more segmentation but enacting more integration. Study 2 replicates the results of Study 1, showing that strain causally affects segmentation preferences. DISCUSSION: This two-study paper is one of the first to address daily fluctuations in segmentation preferences and integration enactments, extending our knowledge of temporal dynamics in boundary management. Furthermore, it demonstrates that strain is an antecedent of these daily fluctuations, offering starting points for practical interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10628038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106280382023-11-08 Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study Mueller, Nicolas Loeffelsend, Sophia Vater, Elke Kempen, Regina Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: Transformations in the work–nonwork interface highlight the importance of effectively managing the boundaries between life domains. However, do the ways individuals manage the boundaries between work and nonwork life change from one day to the next? If so, which antecedents may explain these intra-individual fluctuations in boundary management? Drawing on boundary management, spillover, and resource theories, we investigate daily changes in segmentation preferences and integration enactments as a function of experiencing strain in work and nonwork life. Assuming that changes in segmentation preferences reflect an individual’s strategy to regulate negative cross-role spillover, we suppose that strain increases individuals’ segmentation preferences; at the same time, however, it could force individuals to enact more integration. METHODS: We test our assumptions with data from two studies with different methodological approaches. The first study uses a daily diary research design (Study 1, 425 participants with 3,238 daily observations) in which full-time professionals rated strain in work and nonwork life, segmentation preferences, and integration enactments every evening for 10 workdays. The second study uses an experimental vignette research design (Study 2, 181 participants), where we experimentally manipulated strain in work and nonwork life and investigated causal effects on participants’ hypothetical segmentation preferences. RESULTS: The results of multilevel modeling analyses in Study 1 show that segmentation preferences and integration enactments fluctuate from day to day as a function of strain. More specifically, strain is related to preferring more segmentation but enacting more integration. Study 2 replicates the results of Study 1, showing that strain causally affects segmentation preferences. DISCUSSION: This two-study paper is one of the first to address daily fluctuations in segmentation preferences and integration enactments, extending our knowledge of temporal dynamics in boundary management. Furthermore, it demonstrates that strain is an antecedent of these daily fluctuations, offering starting points for practical interventions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10628038/ /pubmed/37941752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149969 Text en Copyright © 2023 Mueller, Loeffelsend, Vater and Kempen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Mueller, Nicolas Loeffelsend, Sophia Vater, Elke Kempen, Regina Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study |
title | Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study |
title_full | Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study |
title_fullStr | Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study |
title_short | Effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study |
title_sort | effects of strain on boundary management: findings from a daily diary study and an experimental vignette study |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149969 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muellernicolas effectsofstrainonboundarymanagementfindingsfromadailydiarystudyandanexperimentalvignettestudy AT loeffelsendsophia effectsofstrainonboundarymanagementfindingsfromadailydiarystudyandanexperimentalvignettestudy AT vaterelke effectsofstrainonboundarymanagementfindingsfromadailydiarystudyandanexperimentalvignettestudy AT kempenregina effectsofstrainonboundarymanagementfindingsfromadailydiarystudyandanexperimentalvignettestudy |