Cargando…

Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples

This study sought to validate the psychometric properties of the Health Regulatory Focus Scale (HRFS), emphasizing its manifestation and association with personality traits in a Chinese context. Originally developed by Ferrer, the HRFS gauges individuals’ inclinations either to avoid negative health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyu, Xiaokang, Yang, Tingting, Fan, Yanqin, Hong, Haijuan, Fu, Chunye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1215209
_version_ 1785131678200496128
author Lyu, Xiaokang
Yang, Tingting
Fan, Yanqin
Hong, Haijuan
Fu, Chunye
author_facet Lyu, Xiaokang
Yang, Tingting
Fan, Yanqin
Hong, Haijuan
Fu, Chunye
author_sort Lyu, Xiaokang
collection PubMed
description This study sought to validate the psychometric properties of the Health Regulatory Focus Scale (HRFS), emphasizing its manifestation and association with personality traits in a Chinese context. Originally developed by Ferrer, the HRFS gauges individuals’ inclinations either to avoid negative health outcomes (prevention focus) or achieve positive health outcomes (promotion focus). Our cross-sectional analysis involved a diverse sample of 652 Chinese participants, averaging 39.6 years in age (SD = 9.39). Data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS, and both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were employed to assess the HRFS’s factor structure. Additionally, we evaluated convergent and discriminant validity, criterion-related validity, internal consistency reliability, and test–retest reliability. The CFA results (CFI = 0.985, TLI = 0.971, RMSEA = 0.059, and SRMR = 0.047), combined with McDonald’s omega value (0.916) and the test–retest correlation coefficient (0.78) for the HRFS, underscore its robust construct validity and reliability. Furthermore, the promotion dimension of the HRFS exhibited significant positive correlations with all dimensions of the Chinese Adjectives Short Scale of Big-Five Factor Personality (BFFP-CAS-S). In conclusion, the HRFS’s Chinese adaptation offers a reliable and valid instrument for assessing health regulatory focus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10628087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106280872023-11-08 Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples Lyu, Xiaokang Yang, Tingting Fan, Yanqin Hong, Haijuan Fu, Chunye Front Psychol Psychology This study sought to validate the psychometric properties of the Health Regulatory Focus Scale (HRFS), emphasizing its manifestation and association with personality traits in a Chinese context. Originally developed by Ferrer, the HRFS gauges individuals’ inclinations either to avoid negative health outcomes (prevention focus) or achieve positive health outcomes (promotion focus). Our cross-sectional analysis involved a diverse sample of 652 Chinese participants, averaging 39.6 years in age (SD = 9.39). Data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS, and both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were employed to assess the HRFS’s factor structure. Additionally, we evaluated convergent and discriminant validity, criterion-related validity, internal consistency reliability, and test–retest reliability. The CFA results (CFI = 0.985, TLI = 0.971, RMSEA = 0.059, and SRMR = 0.047), combined with McDonald’s omega value (0.916) and the test–retest correlation coefficient (0.78) for the HRFS, underscore its robust construct validity and reliability. Furthermore, the promotion dimension of the HRFS exhibited significant positive correlations with all dimensions of the Chinese Adjectives Short Scale of Big-Five Factor Personality (BFFP-CAS-S). In conclusion, the HRFS’s Chinese adaptation offers a reliable and valid instrument for assessing health regulatory focus. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10628087/ /pubmed/37941753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1215209 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lyu, Yang, Fan, Hong and Fu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lyu, Xiaokang
Yang, Tingting
Fan, Yanqin
Hong, Haijuan
Fu, Chunye
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples
title Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples
title_full Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples
title_fullStr Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples
title_short Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples
title_sort evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in chinese samples
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1215209
work_keys_str_mv AT lyuxiaokang evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityofthehealthregulatoryfocusscaleinchinesesamples
AT yangtingting evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityofthehealthregulatoryfocusscaleinchinesesamples
AT fanyanqin evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityofthehealthregulatoryfocusscaleinchinesesamples
AT honghaijuan evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityofthehealthregulatoryfocusscaleinchinesesamples
AT fuchunye evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityofthehealthregulatoryfocusscaleinchinesesamples