Cargando…
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples
This study sought to validate the psychometric properties of the Health Regulatory Focus Scale (HRFS), emphasizing its manifestation and association with personality traits in a Chinese context. Originally developed by Ferrer, the HRFS gauges individuals’ inclinations either to avoid negative health...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1215209 |
_version_ | 1785131678200496128 |
---|---|
author | Lyu, Xiaokang Yang, Tingting Fan, Yanqin Hong, Haijuan Fu, Chunye |
author_facet | Lyu, Xiaokang Yang, Tingting Fan, Yanqin Hong, Haijuan Fu, Chunye |
author_sort | Lyu, Xiaokang |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study sought to validate the psychometric properties of the Health Regulatory Focus Scale (HRFS), emphasizing its manifestation and association with personality traits in a Chinese context. Originally developed by Ferrer, the HRFS gauges individuals’ inclinations either to avoid negative health outcomes (prevention focus) or achieve positive health outcomes (promotion focus). Our cross-sectional analysis involved a diverse sample of 652 Chinese participants, averaging 39.6 years in age (SD = 9.39). Data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS, and both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were employed to assess the HRFS’s factor structure. Additionally, we evaluated convergent and discriminant validity, criterion-related validity, internal consistency reliability, and test–retest reliability. The CFA results (CFI = 0.985, TLI = 0.971, RMSEA = 0.059, and SRMR = 0.047), combined with McDonald’s omega value (0.916) and the test–retest correlation coefficient (0.78) for the HRFS, underscore its robust construct validity and reliability. Furthermore, the promotion dimension of the HRFS exhibited significant positive correlations with all dimensions of the Chinese Adjectives Short Scale of Big-Five Factor Personality (BFFP-CAS-S). In conclusion, the HRFS’s Chinese adaptation offers a reliable and valid instrument for assessing health regulatory focus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10628087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106280872023-11-08 Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples Lyu, Xiaokang Yang, Tingting Fan, Yanqin Hong, Haijuan Fu, Chunye Front Psychol Psychology This study sought to validate the psychometric properties of the Health Regulatory Focus Scale (HRFS), emphasizing its manifestation and association with personality traits in a Chinese context. Originally developed by Ferrer, the HRFS gauges individuals’ inclinations either to avoid negative health outcomes (prevention focus) or achieve positive health outcomes (promotion focus). Our cross-sectional analysis involved a diverse sample of 652 Chinese participants, averaging 39.6 years in age (SD = 9.39). Data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS, and both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were employed to assess the HRFS’s factor structure. Additionally, we evaluated convergent and discriminant validity, criterion-related validity, internal consistency reliability, and test–retest reliability. The CFA results (CFI = 0.985, TLI = 0.971, RMSEA = 0.059, and SRMR = 0.047), combined with McDonald’s omega value (0.916) and the test–retest correlation coefficient (0.78) for the HRFS, underscore its robust construct validity and reliability. Furthermore, the promotion dimension of the HRFS exhibited significant positive correlations with all dimensions of the Chinese Adjectives Short Scale of Big-Five Factor Personality (BFFP-CAS-S). In conclusion, the HRFS’s Chinese adaptation offers a reliable and valid instrument for assessing health regulatory focus. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10628087/ /pubmed/37941753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1215209 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lyu, Yang, Fan, Hong and Fu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Lyu, Xiaokang Yang, Tingting Fan, Yanqin Hong, Haijuan Fu, Chunye Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples |
title | Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples |
title_full | Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples |
title_short | Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in Chinese samples |
title_sort | evaluation of the reliability and validity of the health regulatory focus scale in chinese samples |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1215209 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lyuxiaokang evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityofthehealthregulatoryfocusscaleinchinesesamples AT yangtingting evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityofthehealthregulatoryfocusscaleinchinesesamples AT fanyanqin evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityofthehealthregulatoryfocusscaleinchinesesamples AT honghaijuan evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityofthehealthregulatoryfocusscaleinchinesesamples AT fuchunye evaluationofthereliabilityandvalidityofthehealthregulatoryfocusscaleinchinesesamples |