Cargando…

Time for change: compliance with RCS green theatre checklist—facilitators and barriers on the journey to net zero

BACKGROUND: Climate change is an era-defining health concern, with healthcare related emissions paradoxically compounding negative impacts. The NHS produces 5% of the UK's carbon footprint, with operating theatres a recognised carbon hotspot. NHS England aims to become Net Zero by 2045. Consequ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westwood, Elizabeth, Walshaw, Josephine, Boag, Katie, Chua, WeiYing, Dimashki, Safaa, Khalid, Hammaad, Lathan, Ross, Wellington, Jack, Lockwood, Sonia, Yiasemidou, Marina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37942001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1260301
_version_ 1785131771734523904
author Westwood, Elizabeth
Walshaw, Josephine
Boag, Katie
Chua, WeiYing
Dimashki, Safaa
Khalid, Hammaad
Lathan, Ross
Wellington, Jack
Lockwood, Sonia
Yiasemidou, Marina
author_facet Westwood, Elizabeth
Walshaw, Josephine
Boag, Katie
Chua, WeiYing
Dimashki, Safaa
Khalid, Hammaad
Lathan, Ross
Wellington, Jack
Lockwood, Sonia
Yiasemidou, Marina
author_sort Westwood, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Climate change is an era-defining health concern, with healthcare related emissions paradoxically compounding negative impacts. The NHS produces 5% of the UK's carbon footprint, with operating theatres a recognised carbon hotspot. NHS England aims to become Net Zero by 2045. Consequently, UK Royal Colleges of Surgery have published guidance to foster an evidence-based sustainable transformation in surgical practice. METHODS: A single-centre quality improvement project was undertaken, aiming to provide an overview of sustainable practice locally. The Intercollegiate “Green Theatre Checklist” was taken as an audit standard, focusing on “preparing for surgery” and “intraoperative equipment” subsections. Any general surgical procedure was eligible for inclusion. Usage of reusable textiles, non-sterile gloves, catheters, antibiotics, alcohol vs. water-based scrub techniques, skin sterilisation choices, and skin closure materials were recorded. Baseline data collection occurred over a 3 week period, followed by dissemination of results locally via clinical governance meetings and poster displays. A re-audit of practice was conducted using the same methodology and duration. RESULTS: Datasets 1 (n = 23) and 2 (n = 23) included open (n = 22), laparoscopic (n = 24), elective (n = 22) and non-elective (n = 24) cases. Good practice was demonstrated in reusable textiles (trolley covers 96%, 78%, drapes 100%, 92%) however procurement issues reduced otherwise good reusable gown use in Dataset 2 in (90%, 46%). No unnecessary catheter use was identified, and loose skin preparations were used unanimously. Uptake of alcohol-based scrubbing techniques was low (15%, 17%) and unnecessary non-sterile glove use was observed in >30% of procedures. All laparoscopic ports and scissors were single use. Carbon footprints were 128.27 kgCO2e and 117.71 kgCO2e in datasets 1 and 2 respectively. CONCLUSION: This project evidences good practice alongside future local focus areas for improved sustainability. Adoption of hybrid laparoscopic instruments, avoiding unnecessary equipment opening, and standardising reusable materials could reduce carbon and environmental impact considerably. Successful implementation requires considered procurement practices, improved awareness and education, clear leadership, and a sustained cultural shift within the healthcare community. Collaboration among professional institutions and access to supporting evidence is crucial in driving engagement and empowering clinicians to make locally relevant changes a reality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10628494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106284942023-11-08 Time for change: compliance with RCS green theatre checklist—facilitators and barriers on the journey to net zero Westwood, Elizabeth Walshaw, Josephine Boag, Katie Chua, WeiYing Dimashki, Safaa Khalid, Hammaad Lathan, Ross Wellington, Jack Lockwood, Sonia Yiasemidou, Marina Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Climate change is an era-defining health concern, with healthcare related emissions paradoxically compounding negative impacts. The NHS produces 5% of the UK's carbon footprint, with operating theatres a recognised carbon hotspot. NHS England aims to become Net Zero by 2045. Consequently, UK Royal Colleges of Surgery have published guidance to foster an evidence-based sustainable transformation in surgical practice. METHODS: A single-centre quality improvement project was undertaken, aiming to provide an overview of sustainable practice locally. The Intercollegiate “Green Theatre Checklist” was taken as an audit standard, focusing on “preparing for surgery” and “intraoperative equipment” subsections. Any general surgical procedure was eligible for inclusion. Usage of reusable textiles, non-sterile gloves, catheters, antibiotics, alcohol vs. water-based scrub techniques, skin sterilisation choices, and skin closure materials were recorded. Baseline data collection occurred over a 3 week period, followed by dissemination of results locally via clinical governance meetings and poster displays. A re-audit of practice was conducted using the same methodology and duration. RESULTS: Datasets 1 (n = 23) and 2 (n = 23) included open (n = 22), laparoscopic (n = 24), elective (n = 22) and non-elective (n = 24) cases. Good practice was demonstrated in reusable textiles (trolley covers 96%, 78%, drapes 100%, 92%) however procurement issues reduced otherwise good reusable gown use in Dataset 2 in (90%, 46%). No unnecessary catheter use was identified, and loose skin preparations were used unanimously. Uptake of alcohol-based scrubbing techniques was low (15%, 17%) and unnecessary non-sterile glove use was observed in >30% of procedures. All laparoscopic ports and scissors were single use. Carbon footprints were 128.27 kgCO2e and 117.71 kgCO2e in datasets 1 and 2 respectively. CONCLUSION: This project evidences good practice alongside future local focus areas for improved sustainability. Adoption of hybrid laparoscopic instruments, avoiding unnecessary equipment opening, and standardising reusable materials could reduce carbon and environmental impact considerably. Successful implementation requires considered procurement practices, improved awareness and education, clear leadership, and a sustained cultural shift within the healthcare community. Collaboration among professional institutions and access to supporting evidence is crucial in driving engagement and empowering clinicians to make locally relevant changes a reality. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10628494/ /pubmed/37942001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1260301 Text en © 2023 Westwood, Walshaw, Boag, Chua, Dimashki, Khalid, Lathan, Wellington, Lockwood and Yiasemidou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Westwood, Elizabeth
Walshaw, Josephine
Boag, Katie
Chua, WeiYing
Dimashki, Safaa
Khalid, Hammaad
Lathan, Ross
Wellington, Jack
Lockwood, Sonia
Yiasemidou, Marina
Time for change: compliance with RCS green theatre checklist—facilitators and barriers on the journey to net zero
title Time for change: compliance with RCS green theatre checklist—facilitators and barriers on the journey to net zero
title_full Time for change: compliance with RCS green theatre checklist—facilitators and barriers on the journey to net zero
title_fullStr Time for change: compliance with RCS green theatre checklist—facilitators and barriers on the journey to net zero
title_full_unstemmed Time for change: compliance with RCS green theatre checklist—facilitators and barriers on the journey to net zero
title_short Time for change: compliance with RCS green theatre checklist—facilitators and barriers on the journey to net zero
title_sort time for change: compliance with rcs green theatre checklist—facilitators and barriers on the journey to net zero
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37942001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1260301
work_keys_str_mv AT westwoodelizabeth timeforchangecompliancewithrcsgreentheatrechecklistfacilitatorsandbarriersonthejourneytonetzero
AT walshawjosephine timeforchangecompliancewithrcsgreentheatrechecklistfacilitatorsandbarriersonthejourneytonetzero
AT boagkatie timeforchangecompliancewithrcsgreentheatrechecklistfacilitatorsandbarriersonthejourneytonetzero
AT chuaweiying timeforchangecompliancewithrcsgreentheatrechecklistfacilitatorsandbarriersonthejourneytonetzero
AT dimashkisafaa timeforchangecompliancewithrcsgreentheatrechecklistfacilitatorsandbarriersonthejourneytonetzero
AT khalidhammaad timeforchangecompliancewithrcsgreentheatrechecklistfacilitatorsandbarriersonthejourneytonetzero
AT lathanross timeforchangecompliancewithrcsgreentheatrechecklistfacilitatorsandbarriersonthejourneytonetzero
AT wellingtonjack timeforchangecompliancewithrcsgreentheatrechecklistfacilitatorsandbarriersonthejourneytonetzero
AT lockwoodsonia timeforchangecompliancewithrcsgreentheatrechecklistfacilitatorsandbarriersonthejourneytonetzero
AT yiasemidoumarina timeforchangecompliancewithrcsgreentheatrechecklistfacilitatorsandbarriersonthejourneytonetzero