Cargando…

Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series

AIM: Bone transport is a beneficial reconstructive method for bone defects caused by infected non-unions or bone tumours. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is a three-dimensional corrective external fixator that can be used to achieve bone transport and correct any residual deformities easily at any ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shimokawa, Kanu, Matsubara, Hidenori, Hikichi, Toshifumi, Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37942427
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1594
_version_ 1785131796815413248
author Shimokawa, Kanu
Matsubara, Hidenori
Hikichi, Toshifumi
Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
author_facet Shimokawa, Kanu
Matsubara, Hidenori
Hikichi, Toshifumi
Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
author_sort Shimokawa, Kanu
collection PubMed
description AIM: Bone transport is a beneficial reconstructive method for bone defects caused by infected non-unions or bone tumours. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is a three-dimensional corrective external fixator that can be used to achieve bone transport and correct any residual deformities easily at any time. This study reports the results of bone transport using TSF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of ten patients who underwent bone transport using the TSF. The mean age was 32.3 years; the femur was affected in one case and the lower leg in nine. Bone defects were due to infected non-unions in seven cases and bone tumours in three. The duration of external fixation, bone transport distance, distraction index (DI), alignment at the end of correction, leg length discrepancy, and complications were investigated. RESULTS: The average bone transport distance was 76.0 mm. The external fixation period averaged 367 days with the DI at 20.8 days/cm. Deformity at the docking site was assessed to have an average 2.6° deformity and 2.0 mm translation in the frontal view, as well as 3.3° deformity and 3.7 mm translation in the lateral view. The mean leg length discrepancy was 10.9 mm and the percentage of the mechanical axis (%MA) was 40.6%. Four patients underwent plate conversion after correction and two required additional surgery for non-union at the docking site. Bone union was achieved in all patients and there was no reaggravation of infection or tumour recurrence. CONCLUSION: The TSF allowed for the correction of deformities and translations that occurred during bone transport giving excellent results. However, as with bone transport using this or other devices, additional procedures are often needed to obtain consolidation or docking site union. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Shimokawa K, Matsubara H, Hikichi T, et al. Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):117–122.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10628609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106286092023-11-08 Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series Shimokawa, Kanu Matsubara, Hidenori Hikichi, Toshifumi Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Original Research AIM: Bone transport is a beneficial reconstructive method for bone defects caused by infected non-unions or bone tumours. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is a three-dimensional corrective external fixator that can be used to achieve bone transport and correct any residual deformities easily at any time. This study reports the results of bone transport using TSF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of ten patients who underwent bone transport using the TSF. The mean age was 32.3 years; the femur was affected in one case and the lower leg in nine. Bone defects were due to infected non-unions in seven cases and bone tumours in three. The duration of external fixation, bone transport distance, distraction index (DI), alignment at the end of correction, leg length discrepancy, and complications were investigated. RESULTS: The average bone transport distance was 76.0 mm. The external fixation period averaged 367 days with the DI at 20.8 days/cm. Deformity at the docking site was assessed to have an average 2.6° deformity and 2.0 mm translation in the frontal view, as well as 3.3° deformity and 3.7 mm translation in the lateral view. The mean leg length discrepancy was 10.9 mm and the percentage of the mechanical axis (%MA) was 40.6%. Four patients underwent plate conversion after correction and two required additional surgery for non-union at the docking site. Bone union was achieved in all patients and there was no reaggravation of infection or tumour recurrence. CONCLUSION: The TSF allowed for the correction of deformities and translations that occurred during bone transport giving excellent results. However, as with bone transport using this or other devices, additional procedures are often needed to obtain consolidation or docking site union. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Shimokawa K, Matsubara H, Hikichi T, et al. Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):117–122. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10628609/ /pubmed/37942427 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1594 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-share alike license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as original. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shimokawa, Kanu
Matsubara, Hidenori
Hikichi, Toshifumi
Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series
title Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series
title_full Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series
title_fullStr Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series
title_short Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series
title_sort bone transport with the taylor spatial frame technique: a case series
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37942427
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1594
work_keys_str_mv AT shimokawakanu bonetransportwiththetaylorspatialframetechniqueacaseseries
AT matsubarahidenori bonetransportwiththetaylorspatialframetechniqueacaseseries
AT hikichitoshifumi bonetransportwiththetaylorspatialframetechniqueacaseseries
AT tsuchiyahiroyuki bonetransportwiththetaylorspatialframetechniqueacaseseries