Cargando…
Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series
AIM: Bone transport is a beneficial reconstructive method for bone defects caused by infected non-unions or bone tumours. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is a three-dimensional corrective external fixator that can be used to achieve bone transport and correct any residual deformities easily at any ti...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37942427 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1594 |
_version_ | 1785131796815413248 |
---|---|
author | Shimokawa, Kanu Matsubara, Hidenori Hikichi, Toshifumi Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki |
author_facet | Shimokawa, Kanu Matsubara, Hidenori Hikichi, Toshifumi Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki |
author_sort | Shimokawa, Kanu |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Bone transport is a beneficial reconstructive method for bone defects caused by infected non-unions or bone tumours. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is a three-dimensional corrective external fixator that can be used to achieve bone transport and correct any residual deformities easily at any time. This study reports the results of bone transport using TSF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of ten patients who underwent bone transport using the TSF. The mean age was 32.3 years; the femur was affected in one case and the lower leg in nine. Bone defects were due to infected non-unions in seven cases and bone tumours in three. The duration of external fixation, bone transport distance, distraction index (DI), alignment at the end of correction, leg length discrepancy, and complications were investigated. RESULTS: The average bone transport distance was 76.0 mm. The external fixation period averaged 367 days with the DI at 20.8 days/cm. Deformity at the docking site was assessed to have an average 2.6° deformity and 2.0 mm translation in the frontal view, as well as 3.3° deformity and 3.7 mm translation in the lateral view. The mean leg length discrepancy was 10.9 mm and the percentage of the mechanical axis (%MA) was 40.6%. Four patients underwent plate conversion after correction and two required additional surgery for non-union at the docking site. Bone union was achieved in all patients and there was no reaggravation of infection or tumour recurrence. CONCLUSION: The TSF allowed for the correction of deformities and translations that occurred during bone transport giving excellent results. However, as with bone transport using this or other devices, additional procedures are often needed to obtain consolidation or docking site union. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Shimokawa K, Matsubara H, Hikichi T, et al. Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):117–122. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10628609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106286092023-11-08 Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series Shimokawa, Kanu Matsubara, Hidenori Hikichi, Toshifumi Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Original Research AIM: Bone transport is a beneficial reconstructive method for bone defects caused by infected non-unions or bone tumours. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is a three-dimensional corrective external fixator that can be used to achieve bone transport and correct any residual deformities easily at any time. This study reports the results of bone transport using TSF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of ten patients who underwent bone transport using the TSF. The mean age was 32.3 years; the femur was affected in one case and the lower leg in nine. Bone defects were due to infected non-unions in seven cases and bone tumours in three. The duration of external fixation, bone transport distance, distraction index (DI), alignment at the end of correction, leg length discrepancy, and complications were investigated. RESULTS: The average bone transport distance was 76.0 mm. The external fixation period averaged 367 days with the DI at 20.8 days/cm. Deformity at the docking site was assessed to have an average 2.6° deformity and 2.0 mm translation in the frontal view, as well as 3.3° deformity and 3.7 mm translation in the lateral view. The mean leg length discrepancy was 10.9 mm and the percentage of the mechanical axis (%MA) was 40.6%. Four patients underwent plate conversion after correction and two required additional surgery for non-union at the docking site. Bone union was achieved in all patients and there was no reaggravation of infection or tumour recurrence. CONCLUSION: The TSF allowed for the correction of deformities and translations that occurred during bone transport giving excellent results. However, as with bone transport using this or other devices, additional procedures are often needed to obtain consolidation or docking site union. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Shimokawa K, Matsubara H, Hikichi T, et al. Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):117–122. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10628609/ /pubmed/37942427 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1594 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-share alike license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as original. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Shimokawa, Kanu Matsubara, Hidenori Hikichi, Toshifumi Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series |
title | Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series |
title_full | Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series |
title_fullStr | Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series |
title_short | Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series |
title_sort | bone transport with the taylor spatial frame technique: a case series |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37942427 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shimokawakanu bonetransportwiththetaylorspatialframetechniqueacaseseries AT matsubarahidenori bonetransportwiththetaylorspatialframetechniqueacaseseries AT hikichitoshifumi bonetransportwiththetaylorspatialframetechniqueacaseseries AT tsuchiyahiroyuki bonetransportwiththetaylorspatialframetechniqueacaseseries |