Cargando…

Head-to-Head Comparison of Nine Assays for the Detection of Anti-Echinococcus Antibodies: A Retrospective Evaluation

BACKGROUND: Echinococcosis is a neglected tropical disease that is severely underdiagnosed in resource-limited settings. In developed countries, diagnosing echinococcosis is challenging, and reliable serological assays are urgently needed. In the Central European Alps, EM is more common than EG; how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mattwich, Carolina, Huber, Kristina, Bretzel, Gisela, Suerbaum, Sebastian, Wieser, Andreas, Dichtl, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.0212
_version_ 1785131828493942784
author Mattwich, Carolina
Huber, Kristina
Bretzel, Gisela
Suerbaum, Sebastian
Wieser, Andreas
Dichtl, Karl
author_facet Mattwich, Carolina
Huber, Kristina
Bretzel, Gisela
Suerbaum, Sebastian
Wieser, Andreas
Dichtl, Karl
author_sort Mattwich, Carolina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Echinococcosis is a neglected tropical disease that is severely underdiagnosed in resource-limited settings. In developed countries, diagnosing echinococcosis is challenging, and reliable serological assays are urgently needed. In the Central European Alps, EM is more common than EG; however, data on the diagnostic performance of assays for EM cases are scarce. We evaluated the suitability of nine antibody assays for routine diagnostics. METHODS: Nine commercially available serological assays for detecting anti-Echinococcus antibodies were compared head-to-head using samples collected from 50 patients with echinococcosis and 50 age- and sex-matched control subjects. The assays are Anti-Echinococcus ELISA (IgG) (Euroimmun), Echinococcus IgG ELISA (DRG), Echinococcus IgG ELISA (IBL International), Echinococcus Western Blot IgG (LDBIO Diagnostics), EUROLINE WB (Euroimmun), Hydatidosis ELISA IgG (VirCell), Hydatidosis VIRCLIA IgG Monotest (VirCell), Ridascreen Echinococcus IgG (R-Biopharm), and Virapid Hydatidosis (VirCell). The cases were ranked according to the WHO-Informal Working Group on Echinococcosis (WHO-IWGE) criteria as confirmed, probable, or possible. RESULTS: The performance of the assays varied greatly, with overall sensitivities ranging between 50% and 88% and specificities between 62% and 100%. We observed a trend toward better performance with cases classified as “confirmed” using the WHO-IWGE criteria. Combined analysis with sequential screening and confirmatory testing resulted in a maximum sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 100%. Differentiation between EG and EM infections is clinically relevant but was found to be unreliable. CONCLUSIONS: Echinococcus serological assays are highly variable in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Knowledge of the pre-test probability in the patient cohort is required to choose a suitable assay. A combined approach with screening and confirmatory assays may be the best diagnostic strategy in many situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10628756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2024
publisher Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106287562023-11-08 Head-to-Head Comparison of Nine Assays for the Detection of Anti-Echinococcus Antibodies: A Retrospective Evaluation Mattwich, Carolina Huber, Kristina Bretzel, Gisela Suerbaum, Sebastian Wieser, Andreas Dichtl, Karl Ann Lab Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Echinococcosis is a neglected tropical disease that is severely underdiagnosed in resource-limited settings. In developed countries, diagnosing echinococcosis is challenging, and reliable serological assays are urgently needed. In the Central European Alps, EM is more common than EG; however, data on the diagnostic performance of assays for EM cases are scarce. We evaluated the suitability of nine antibody assays for routine diagnostics. METHODS: Nine commercially available serological assays for detecting anti-Echinococcus antibodies were compared head-to-head using samples collected from 50 patients with echinococcosis and 50 age- and sex-matched control subjects. The assays are Anti-Echinococcus ELISA (IgG) (Euroimmun), Echinococcus IgG ELISA (DRG), Echinococcus IgG ELISA (IBL International), Echinococcus Western Blot IgG (LDBIO Diagnostics), EUROLINE WB (Euroimmun), Hydatidosis ELISA IgG (VirCell), Hydatidosis VIRCLIA IgG Monotest (VirCell), Ridascreen Echinococcus IgG (R-Biopharm), and Virapid Hydatidosis (VirCell). The cases were ranked according to the WHO-Informal Working Group on Echinococcosis (WHO-IWGE) criteria as confirmed, probable, or possible. RESULTS: The performance of the assays varied greatly, with overall sensitivities ranging between 50% and 88% and specificities between 62% and 100%. We observed a trend toward better performance with cases classified as “confirmed” using the WHO-IWGE criteria. Combined analysis with sequential screening and confirmatory testing resulted in a maximum sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 100%. Differentiation between EG and EM infections is clinically relevant but was found to be unreliable. CONCLUSIONS: Echinococcus serological assays are highly variable in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Knowledge of the pre-test probability in the patient cohort is required to choose a suitable assay. A combined approach with screening and confirmatory assays may be the best diagnostic strategy in many situations. Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2024-03-01 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10628756/ /pubmed/37880992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.0212 Text en © Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mattwich, Carolina
Huber, Kristina
Bretzel, Gisela
Suerbaum, Sebastian
Wieser, Andreas
Dichtl, Karl
Head-to-Head Comparison of Nine Assays for the Detection of Anti-Echinococcus Antibodies: A Retrospective Evaluation
title Head-to-Head Comparison of Nine Assays for the Detection of Anti-Echinococcus Antibodies: A Retrospective Evaluation
title_full Head-to-Head Comparison of Nine Assays for the Detection of Anti-Echinococcus Antibodies: A Retrospective Evaluation
title_fullStr Head-to-Head Comparison of Nine Assays for the Detection of Anti-Echinococcus Antibodies: A Retrospective Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Head-to-Head Comparison of Nine Assays for the Detection of Anti-Echinococcus Antibodies: A Retrospective Evaluation
title_short Head-to-Head Comparison of Nine Assays for the Detection of Anti-Echinococcus Antibodies: A Retrospective Evaluation
title_sort head-to-head comparison of nine assays for the detection of anti-echinococcus antibodies: a retrospective evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.0212
work_keys_str_mv AT mattwichcarolina headtoheadcomparisonofnineassaysforthedetectionofantiechinococcusantibodiesaretrospectiveevaluation
AT huberkristina headtoheadcomparisonofnineassaysforthedetectionofantiechinococcusantibodiesaretrospectiveevaluation
AT bretzelgisela headtoheadcomparisonofnineassaysforthedetectionofantiechinococcusantibodiesaretrospectiveevaluation
AT suerbaumsebastian headtoheadcomparisonofnineassaysforthedetectionofantiechinococcusantibodiesaretrospectiveevaluation
AT wieserandreas headtoheadcomparisonofnineassaysforthedetectionofantiechinococcusantibodiesaretrospectiveevaluation
AT dichtlkarl headtoheadcomparisonofnineassaysforthedetectionofantiechinococcusantibodiesaretrospectiveevaluation