Cargando…

Endometriosis and IVF treatment outcomes: unpacking the process

Advanced endometriosis is associated with a reduction of IVF success. Surgical damage to the ovarian reserve following the excision of endometriomas has been claimed as a critical factor in the explanation of this detrimental effect. However, it is generally inferred that other mechanisms might also...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Somigliana, Edgardo, Piani, Letizia Li, Paffoni, Alessio, Salmeri, Noemi, Orsi, Michele, Benaglia, Laura, Vercellini, Paolo, Vigano’, Paola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01157-8
_version_ 1785131890763628544
author Somigliana, Edgardo
Piani, Letizia Li
Paffoni, Alessio
Salmeri, Noemi
Orsi, Michele
Benaglia, Laura
Vercellini, Paolo
Vigano’, Paola
author_facet Somigliana, Edgardo
Piani, Letizia Li
Paffoni, Alessio
Salmeri, Noemi
Orsi, Michele
Benaglia, Laura
Vercellini, Paolo
Vigano’, Paola
author_sort Somigliana, Edgardo
collection PubMed
description Advanced endometriosis is associated with a reduction of IVF success. Surgical damage to the ovarian reserve following the excision of endometriomas has been claimed as a critical factor in the explanation of this detrimental effect. However, it is generally inferred that other mechanisms might also hamper IVF success in affected women. They include diminished responsiveness to ovarian stimulation, altered steroidogenesis, a decline in oocyte quality, reduced fertilization and embryo development, and impaired implantation. To navigate these limitations, we scrutinized available literature for studies specifically designed to address distinct phases of the IVF process. Utmost consideration was given to intra-patient ovarian response comparisons in women with unilateral endometriomas and to studies applying a meticulous matching to control confounders. The following observations have been drawn: 1) endometriosis has a negligible impact on ovarian response. A slight reduction in stimulation response can only be observed for endometriomas larger than 4 cm. Follicular steroidogenesis is unaffected; 2) oocyte quality is not hampered. Fertilization rates are similar, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is not justified. Embryonic development is uncompromised, with no increase in aneuploidy rate; 3) endometrial receptivity is either unaffected or only slightly impacted. In conclusion, our study suggests that, aside from the well-known negative effect on ovarian reserve from excisional endometrioma surgeries, endometriosis does not significantly affect IVF outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10629090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106290902023-11-08 Endometriosis and IVF treatment outcomes: unpacking the process Somigliana, Edgardo Piani, Letizia Li Paffoni, Alessio Salmeri, Noemi Orsi, Michele Benaglia, Laura Vercellini, Paolo Vigano’, Paola Reprod Biol Endocrinol Review Advanced endometriosis is associated with a reduction of IVF success. Surgical damage to the ovarian reserve following the excision of endometriomas has been claimed as a critical factor in the explanation of this detrimental effect. However, it is generally inferred that other mechanisms might also hamper IVF success in affected women. They include diminished responsiveness to ovarian stimulation, altered steroidogenesis, a decline in oocyte quality, reduced fertilization and embryo development, and impaired implantation. To navigate these limitations, we scrutinized available literature for studies specifically designed to address distinct phases of the IVF process. Utmost consideration was given to intra-patient ovarian response comparisons in women with unilateral endometriomas and to studies applying a meticulous matching to control confounders. The following observations have been drawn: 1) endometriosis has a negligible impact on ovarian response. A slight reduction in stimulation response can only be observed for endometriomas larger than 4 cm. Follicular steroidogenesis is unaffected; 2) oocyte quality is not hampered. Fertilization rates are similar, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is not justified. Embryonic development is uncompromised, with no increase in aneuploidy rate; 3) endometrial receptivity is either unaffected or only slightly impacted. In conclusion, our study suggests that, aside from the well-known negative effect on ovarian reserve from excisional endometrioma surgeries, endometriosis does not significantly affect IVF outcomes. BioMed Central 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10629090/ /pubmed/37936154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01157-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Somigliana, Edgardo
Piani, Letizia Li
Paffoni, Alessio
Salmeri, Noemi
Orsi, Michele
Benaglia, Laura
Vercellini, Paolo
Vigano’, Paola
Endometriosis and IVF treatment outcomes: unpacking the process
title Endometriosis and IVF treatment outcomes: unpacking the process
title_full Endometriosis and IVF treatment outcomes: unpacking the process
title_fullStr Endometriosis and IVF treatment outcomes: unpacking the process
title_full_unstemmed Endometriosis and IVF treatment outcomes: unpacking the process
title_short Endometriosis and IVF treatment outcomes: unpacking the process
title_sort endometriosis and ivf treatment outcomes: unpacking the process
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01157-8
work_keys_str_mv AT somiglianaedgardo endometriosisandivftreatmentoutcomesunpackingtheprocess
AT pianiletiziali endometriosisandivftreatmentoutcomesunpackingtheprocess
AT paffonialessio endometriosisandivftreatmentoutcomesunpackingtheprocess
AT salmerinoemi endometriosisandivftreatmentoutcomesunpackingtheprocess
AT orsimichele endometriosisandivftreatmentoutcomesunpackingtheprocess
AT benaglialaura endometriosisandivftreatmentoutcomesunpackingtheprocess
AT vercellinipaolo endometriosisandivftreatmentoutcomesunpackingtheprocess
AT viganopaola endometriosisandivftreatmentoutcomesunpackingtheprocess