Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of child health care in China using multicriteria decision analysis methods

Child health is an important public health issue in China and the Chinese government always attached great importance to child health care. With the implementation of a series of medical and health reforms in China in recent decades, the status of child health improved year by year. Objectives This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Miao, Liu, Qian, Wang, Zhengye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10204-4
_version_ 1785131898998095872
author Wu, Miao
Liu, Qian
Wang, Zhengye
author_facet Wu, Miao
Liu, Qian
Wang, Zhengye
author_sort Wu, Miao
collection PubMed
description Child health is an important public health issue in China and the Chinese government always attached great importance to child health care. With the implementation of a series of medical and health reforms in China in recent decades, the status of child health improved year by year. Objectives This study aims to comprehensively evaluate if the measures implemented in the medical and health reforms effectively promoted the development of Chinese child health care in recent years and provide theoretical support for future decision-making on the policies of child health care in China. Methods A total of six indicators were selected from the China Health Statistics Yearbook. Based on the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) algorithm, three different evaluation methods were applied in the study, which are the weighted technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method, the weighted rank-sum ratio (RSR) method, and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE). Each indicator's weight was calculated by the entropy weight methods objectively. The sensitivity analysis was conducted to validate the stability and accuracy of the rank results. Results The results indicated that the rank values of each year’s child health care calculated by the different evaluation methods were not exactly the same, but the overall trend is consistent which is that child health care in China improved year by year from 2000 to 2020. The top 5 were ranked from 2016-2020 and the bottom 5 were ranked from 2000-2004. Conclusions The results indicated that the policies and measures implemented in the medical and health reforms, as well as improved sanitation conditions, availability of healthy food and water, etc., have jointly promoted the development of child health care in China in the past 20 years, providing a scientific theoretical basis for future policy-making to promote child health care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10629125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106291252023-11-08 A comparative evaluation of child health care in China using multicriteria decision analysis methods Wu, Miao Liu, Qian Wang, Zhengye BMC Health Serv Res Research Child health is an important public health issue in China and the Chinese government always attached great importance to child health care. With the implementation of a series of medical and health reforms in China in recent decades, the status of child health improved year by year. Objectives This study aims to comprehensively evaluate if the measures implemented in the medical and health reforms effectively promoted the development of Chinese child health care in recent years and provide theoretical support for future decision-making on the policies of child health care in China. Methods A total of six indicators were selected from the China Health Statistics Yearbook. Based on the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) algorithm, three different evaluation methods were applied in the study, which are the weighted technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method, the weighted rank-sum ratio (RSR) method, and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE). Each indicator's weight was calculated by the entropy weight methods objectively. The sensitivity analysis was conducted to validate the stability and accuracy of the rank results. Results The results indicated that the rank values of each year’s child health care calculated by the different evaluation methods were not exactly the same, but the overall trend is consistent which is that child health care in China improved year by year from 2000 to 2020. The top 5 were ranked from 2016-2020 and the bottom 5 were ranked from 2000-2004. Conclusions The results indicated that the policies and measures implemented in the medical and health reforms, as well as improved sanitation conditions, availability of healthy food and water, etc., have jointly promoted the development of child health care in China in the past 20 years, providing a scientific theoretical basis for future policy-making to promote child health care. BioMed Central 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10629125/ /pubmed/37932716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10204-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wu, Miao
Liu, Qian
Wang, Zhengye
A comparative evaluation of child health care in China using multicriteria decision analysis methods
title A comparative evaluation of child health care in China using multicriteria decision analysis methods
title_full A comparative evaluation of child health care in China using multicriteria decision analysis methods
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of child health care in China using multicriteria decision analysis methods
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of child health care in China using multicriteria decision analysis methods
title_short A comparative evaluation of child health care in China using multicriteria decision analysis methods
title_sort comparative evaluation of child health care in china using multicriteria decision analysis methods
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10204-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wumiao acomparativeevaluationofchildhealthcareinchinausingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismethods
AT liuqian acomparativeevaluationofchildhealthcareinchinausingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismethods
AT wangzhengye acomparativeevaluationofchildhealthcareinchinausingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismethods
AT wumiao comparativeevaluationofchildhealthcareinchinausingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismethods
AT liuqian comparativeevaluationofchildhealthcareinchinausingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismethods
AT wangzhengye comparativeevaluationofchildhealthcareinchinausingmulticriteriadecisionanalysismethods