Cargando…
Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models
BACKGROUND: Manual analysis of (mini-)rhizotron (MR) images is tedious. Several methods have been proposed for semantic root segmentation based on homogeneous, single-source MR datasets. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) have enabled automated feature extraction, but comparisons of segmentation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01101-2 |
_version_ | 1785131899223539712 |
---|---|
author | Baykalov, Pavel Bussmann, Bart Nair, Richard Smith, Abraham George Bodner, Gernot Hadar, Ofer Lazarovitch, Naftali Rewald, Boris |
author_facet | Baykalov, Pavel Bussmann, Bart Nair, Richard Smith, Abraham George Bodner, Gernot Hadar, Ofer Lazarovitch, Naftali Rewald, Boris |
author_sort | Baykalov, Pavel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Manual analysis of (mini-)rhizotron (MR) images is tedious. Several methods have been proposed for semantic root segmentation based on homogeneous, single-source MR datasets. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) have enabled automated feature extraction, but comparisons of segmentation accuracy, false positives and transferability are virtually lacking. Here we compare six state-of-the-art methods and propose two improved DL models for semantic root segmentation using a large MR dataset with and without augmented data. We determine the performance of the methods on a homogeneous maize dataset, and a mixed dataset of > 8 species (mixtures), 6 soil types and 4 imaging systems. The generalisation potential of the derived DL models is determined on a distinct, unseen dataset. RESULTS: The best performance was achieved by the U-Net models; the more complex the encoder the better the accuracy and generalisation of the model. The heterogeneous mixed MR dataset was a particularly challenging for the non-U-Net techniques. Data augmentation enhanced model performance. We demonstrated the improved performance of deep meta-architectures and feature extractors, and a reduction in the number of false positives. CONCLUSIONS: Although correction factors are still required to match human labelled root lengths, neural network architectures greatly reduce the time required to compute the root length. The more complex architectures illustrate how future improvements in root segmentation within MR images can be achieved, particularly reaching higher segmentation accuracies and model generalisation when analysing real-world datasets with artefacts—limiting the need for model retraining. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13007-023-01101-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10629126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106291262023-11-08 Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models Baykalov, Pavel Bussmann, Bart Nair, Richard Smith, Abraham George Bodner, Gernot Hadar, Ofer Lazarovitch, Naftali Rewald, Boris Plant Methods Methodology BACKGROUND: Manual analysis of (mini-)rhizotron (MR) images is tedious. Several methods have been proposed for semantic root segmentation based on homogeneous, single-source MR datasets. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) have enabled automated feature extraction, but comparisons of segmentation accuracy, false positives and transferability are virtually lacking. Here we compare six state-of-the-art methods and propose two improved DL models for semantic root segmentation using a large MR dataset with and without augmented data. We determine the performance of the methods on a homogeneous maize dataset, and a mixed dataset of > 8 species (mixtures), 6 soil types and 4 imaging systems. The generalisation potential of the derived DL models is determined on a distinct, unseen dataset. RESULTS: The best performance was achieved by the U-Net models; the more complex the encoder the better the accuracy and generalisation of the model. The heterogeneous mixed MR dataset was a particularly challenging for the non-U-Net techniques. Data augmentation enhanced model performance. We demonstrated the improved performance of deep meta-architectures and feature extractors, and a reduction in the number of false positives. CONCLUSIONS: Although correction factors are still required to match human labelled root lengths, neural network architectures greatly reduce the time required to compute the root length. The more complex architectures illustrate how future improvements in root segmentation within MR images can be achieved, particularly reaching higher segmentation accuracies and model generalisation when analysing real-world datasets with artefacts—limiting the need for model retraining. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13007-023-01101-2. BioMed Central 2023-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10629126/ /pubmed/37932745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01101-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Baykalov, Pavel Bussmann, Bart Nair, Richard Smith, Abraham George Bodner, Gernot Hadar, Ofer Lazarovitch, Naftali Rewald, Boris Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models |
title | Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models |
title_full | Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models |
title_fullStr | Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models |
title_full_unstemmed | Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models |
title_short | Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models |
title_sort | semantic segmentation of plant roots from rgb (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01101-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baykalovpavel semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels AT bussmannbart semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels AT nairrichard semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels AT smithabrahamgeorge semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels AT bodnergernot semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels AT hadarofer semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels AT lazarovitchnaftali semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels AT rewaldboris semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels |