Cargando…

Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models

BACKGROUND: Manual analysis of (mini-)rhizotron (MR) images is tedious. Several methods have been proposed for semantic root segmentation based on homogeneous, single-source MR datasets. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) have enabled automated feature extraction, but comparisons of segmentation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baykalov, Pavel, Bussmann, Bart, Nair, Richard, Smith, Abraham George, Bodner, Gernot, Hadar, Ofer, Lazarovitch, Naftali, Rewald, Boris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01101-2
_version_ 1785131899223539712
author Baykalov, Pavel
Bussmann, Bart
Nair, Richard
Smith, Abraham George
Bodner, Gernot
Hadar, Ofer
Lazarovitch, Naftali
Rewald, Boris
author_facet Baykalov, Pavel
Bussmann, Bart
Nair, Richard
Smith, Abraham George
Bodner, Gernot
Hadar, Ofer
Lazarovitch, Naftali
Rewald, Boris
author_sort Baykalov, Pavel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Manual analysis of (mini-)rhizotron (MR) images is tedious. Several methods have been proposed for semantic root segmentation based on homogeneous, single-source MR datasets. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) have enabled automated feature extraction, but comparisons of segmentation accuracy, false positives and transferability are virtually lacking. Here we compare six state-of-the-art methods and propose two improved DL models for semantic root segmentation using a large MR dataset with and without augmented data. We determine the performance of the methods on a homogeneous maize dataset, and a mixed dataset of > 8 species (mixtures), 6 soil types and 4 imaging systems. The generalisation potential of the derived DL models is determined on a distinct, unseen dataset. RESULTS: The best performance was achieved by the U-Net models; the more complex the encoder the better the accuracy and generalisation of the model. The heterogeneous mixed MR dataset was a particularly challenging for the non-U-Net techniques. Data augmentation enhanced model performance. We demonstrated the improved performance of deep meta-architectures and feature extractors, and a reduction in the number of false positives. CONCLUSIONS: Although correction factors are still required to match human labelled root lengths, neural network architectures greatly reduce the time required to compute the root length. The more complex architectures illustrate how future improvements in root segmentation within MR images can be achieved, particularly reaching higher segmentation accuracies and model generalisation when analysing real-world datasets with artefacts—limiting the need for model retraining. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13007-023-01101-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10629126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106291262023-11-08 Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models Baykalov, Pavel Bussmann, Bart Nair, Richard Smith, Abraham George Bodner, Gernot Hadar, Ofer Lazarovitch, Naftali Rewald, Boris Plant Methods Methodology BACKGROUND: Manual analysis of (mini-)rhizotron (MR) images is tedious. Several methods have been proposed for semantic root segmentation based on homogeneous, single-source MR datasets. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) have enabled automated feature extraction, but comparisons of segmentation accuracy, false positives and transferability are virtually lacking. Here we compare six state-of-the-art methods and propose two improved DL models for semantic root segmentation using a large MR dataset with and without augmented data. We determine the performance of the methods on a homogeneous maize dataset, and a mixed dataset of > 8 species (mixtures), 6 soil types and 4 imaging systems. The generalisation potential of the derived DL models is determined on a distinct, unseen dataset. RESULTS: The best performance was achieved by the U-Net models; the more complex the encoder the better the accuracy and generalisation of the model. The heterogeneous mixed MR dataset was a particularly challenging for the non-U-Net techniques. Data augmentation enhanced model performance. We demonstrated the improved performance of deep meta-architectures and feature extractors, and a reduction in the number of false positives. CONCLUSIONS: Although correction factors are still required to match human labelled root lengths, neural network architectures greatly reduce the time required to compute the root length. The more complex architectures illustrate how future improvements in root segmentation within MR images can be achieved, particularly reaching higher segmentation accuracies and model generalisation when analysing real-world datasets with artefacts—limiting the need for model retraining. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13007-023-01101-2. BioMed Central 2023-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10629126/ /pubmed/37932745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01101-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Baykalov, Pavel
Bussmann, Bart
Nair, Richard
Smith, Abraham George
Bodner, Gernot
Hadar, Ofer
Lazarovitch, Naftali
Rewald, Boris
Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models
title Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models
title_full Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models
title_fullStr Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models
title_full_unstemmed Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models
title_short Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models
title_sort semantic segmentation of plant roots from rgb (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01101-2
work_keys_str_mv AT baykalovpavel semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels
AT bussmannbart semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels
AT nairrichard semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels
AT smithabrahamgeorge semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels
AT bodnergernot semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels
AT hadarofer semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels
AT lazarovitchnaftali semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels
AT rewaldboris semanticsegmentationofplantrootsfromrgbminirhizotronimagesgeneralisationpotentialandfalsepositivesofestablishedmethodsandadvanceddeeplearningmodels