Cargando…
Exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Making high-quality health and care information available to members of the general public is crucial to support populations with self-care and improve health outcomes. While attention has been paid to how the public accesses and uses health information generally (including personal reco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16918-8 |
_version_ | 1785131905371340800 |
---|---|
author | Heaton-Shrestha, Celayne Hanson, Kristin Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia Delaney, Nancy Vandrevala, Tushna Bearne, Lindsay |
author_facet | Heaton-Shrestha, Celayne Hanson, Kristin Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia Delaney, Nancy Vandrevala, Tushna Bearne, Lindsay |
author_sort | Heaton-Shrestha, Celayne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Making high-quality health and care information available to members of the general public is crucial to support populations with self-care and improve health outcomes. While attention has been paid to how the public accesses and uses health information generally (including personal records, commercial product information or reviews on healthcare practitioners and organisations) and how practitioners and policy-makers access health research evidence, no overview exists of the way that the public accesses and uses high quality health and care information. PURPOSE: This scoping review aimed to map research evidence on how the public accesses and uses a specific type of health information, namely health research and information that does not include personal, product and organisational information. METHODS: Electronic database searches [CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Social Sciences Full Text, Web of Science and SCOPUS] for English language studies of any research design published between 2010–2022 on the public’s access and use of health research or information (as defined above). Data extraction and analysis was informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute protocol for scoping reviews, and reported in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. RESULTS: The search identified 4410 records. Following screening of 234 full text studies, 130 studies were included. One-hundred-and-twenty-nine studies reported on the public’s sources of health-research or information; 56 reported the reasons for accessing health research or information and 14 reported on the use of this research and information. The scoping exercise identified a substantial literature on the broader concept of ‘health information’ but a lack of reporting of the general public’s access to and use of health research. It found that ‘traditional’ sources of information are still relevant alongside newer sources; knowledge of barriers to accessing information focused on personal barriers and on independent searching, while less attention had been paid to barriers to access through other people and settings, people’s lived experiences, and the cultural knowledge required. CONCLUSIONS: The review identified areas where future primary and secondary research would enhance current understanding of how the public accesses and utilises health research or information, and contribute to emerging areas of research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16918-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10629152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106291522023-11-08 Exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: a scoping review Heaton-Shrestha, Celayne Hanson, Kristin Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia Delaney, Nancy Vandrevala, Tushna Bearne, Lindsay BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Making high-quality health and care information available to members of the general public is crucial to support populations with self-care and improve health outcomes. While attention has been paid to how the public accesses and uses health information generally (including personal records, commercial product information or reviews on healthcare practitioners and organisations) and how practitioners and policy-makers access health research evidence, no overview exists of the way that the public accesses and uses high quality health and care information. PURPOSE: This scoping review aimed to map research evidence on how the public accesses and uses a specific type of health information, namely health research and information that does not include personal, product and organisational information. METHODS: Electronic database searches [CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Social Sciences Full Text, Web of Science and SCOPUS] for English language studies of any research design published between 2010–2022 on the public’s access and use of health research or information (as defined above). Data extraction and analysis was informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute protocol for scoping reviews, and reported in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. RESULTS: The search identified 4410 records. Following screening of 234 full text studies, 130 studies were included. One-hundred-and-twenty-nine studies reported on the public’s sources of health-research or information; 56 reported the reasons for accessing health research or information and 14 reported on the use of this research and information. The scoping exercise identified a substantial literature on the broader concept of ‘health information’ but a lack of reporting of the general public’s access to and use of health research. It found that ‘traditional’ sources of information are still relevant alongside newer sources; knowledge of barriers to accessing information focused on personal barriers and on independent searching, while less attention had been paid to barriers to access through other people and settings, people’s lived experiences, and the cultural knowledge required. CONCLUSIONS: The review identified areas where future primary and secondary research would enhance current understanding of how the public accesses and utilises health research or information, and contribute to emerging areas of research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16918-8. BioMed Central 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10629152/ /pubmed/37936117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16918-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Heaton-Shrestha, Celayne Hanson, Kristin Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia Delaney, Nancy Vandrevala, Tushna Bearne, Lindsay Exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: a scoping review |
title | Exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: a scoping review |
title_full | Exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: a scoping review |
title_short | Exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: a scoping review |
title_sort | exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: a scoping review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16918-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heatonshresthacelayne exploringhowmembersofthepublicaccessandusehealthresearchandinformationascopingreview AT hansonkristin exploringhowmembersofthepublicaccessandusehealthresearchandinformationascopingreview AT quirkemcfarlanesophia exploringhowmembersofthepublicaccessandusehealthresearchandinformationascopingreview AT delaneynancy exploringhowmembersofthepublicaccessandusehealthresearchandinformationascopingreview AT vandrevalatushna exploringhowmembersofthepublicaccessandusehealthresearchandinformationascopingreview AT bearnelindsay exploringhowmembersofthepublicaccessandusehealthresearchandinformationascopingreview |