Cargando…

A shorter distal resection margin is a surrogate marker of nodal metastasis and poor prognosis in distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Although a 3–5 cm surgical margin distance is recommended for advanced gastric cancer (GC) in Japanese guidelines, little is known about the clinical effects of the surgical margin, especially the distal resection margin (DM). This study aims to clarify the clinical significance of DM in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takashima, Yusuke, Komatsu, Shuhei, Nishibeppu, Keiji, Ohashi, Takuma, Kosuga, Toshiyuki, Konishi, Hirotaka, Shiozaki, Atsushi, Kubota, Takeshi, Fujiwara, Hitoshi, Otsuji, Eigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11570-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Although a 3–5 cm surgical margin distance is recommended for advanced gastric cancer (GC) in Japanese guidelines, little is known about the clinical effects of the surgical margin, especially the distal resection margin (DM). This study aims to clarify the clinical significance of DM in GC. METHODS: A total of 415 GC patients who underwent curative distal gastrectomy between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The DM significantly stratified recurrence-free survival (P = 0.002), and a DM < 30 mm was an independent factor of a poor prognosis (P = 0.023, hazard ratio: 1.91). Lymphatic recurrence occurred significantly more frequently in the DM < 30 mm group than in the DM ≥ 30 mm group (P = 0.019, 6.9% vs. 1.9%). Regarding the station No.6 lymph node metastases in advanced GC (DM < 30 mm vs. 30 mm ≤ DM ≤ 50 mm vs. DM > 50 mm), the number (P < 0.001, 1.42 ± 1.69 vs. 1.18 ± 1.80 vs. 0.18 ± 0.64), the positive rate (P < 0.001, 59.0% vs. 46.7% vs. 11.3%) and therapeutic value index (43.3 vs. 14.5 vs. 8.0) were significantly higher in the DM < 30 mm group. By subdivision using the DM distance of 30 mm, more segmented prognostic stratifications were possible (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A DM of less than 30 mm could be a surrogate marker of poor RFS, especially increasing nodal recurrence. More intensive treatment strategies, including lymphadenectomy and chemotherapy, are needed for patients with this condition. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-11570-2.