Cargando…
Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions
OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is one of the most important diagnostic tools for investigation of suspected pancreatic masses, although the interpretation of the results is controversial. In recent decades, digital image analysis (DIA) has been considered i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37942305 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_61_2022 |
_version_ | 1785131934121197568 |
---|---|
author | Khozeymeh, Farzaneh Ariamanesh, Mona Roshan, Nema Mohamadian Jafarian, Amirhossein Farzanehfar, Mohammadreza Majd, Hassan Mehrad Sedghian, Alireza Dehghani, Mansoureh |
author_facet | Khozeymeh, Farzaneh Ariamanesh, Mona Roshan, Nema Mohamadian Jafarian, Amirhossein Farzanehfar, Mohammadreza Majd, Hassan Mehrad Sedghian, Alireza Dehghani, Mansoureh |
author_sort | Khozeymeh, Farzaneh |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is one of the most important diagnostic tools for investigation of suspected pancreatic masses, although the interpretation of the results is controversial. In recent decades, digital image analysis (DIA) has been considered in pathology. The aim of this study was to assess the DIA in the evaluation of EUS-FNA based cytopathological specimens of pancreatic masses and comparing it with conventional cytology analysis by pathologist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was performed using cytological slides related to EUS-FNA samples of pancreatic lesions. The digital images were prepared and then analyzed by ImageJ software. Factors such as perimeter, circularity, area, minimum, maximum, mean, median of gray value, and integrated chromatin density of cell nucleus were extracted by software ImageJ and sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff point were evaluated in the diagnosis of malignant and benign lesions. RESULTS: In this retrospective study, 115 cytology samples were examined. Each specimen was reviewed by a pathologist and 150 images were prepared from the benign and malignant lesions and then analyzed by ImageJ software and a cut point was established by SPSS 26. The cutoff points for perimeter, integrated density, and the sum of three factors of perimeter, integrated density, and circularity to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions were reported to be 204.56, 131953, and 24643077, respectively. At this cutting point, the accuracy of estimation is based on the factors of perimeter, integrated density, and the sum of the three factors of perimeter, integrated density, and circularity were 92%, 92%, and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that digital analysis of images has a high accuracy in diagnosing malignant and benign lesions in the cytology of EUS-FNA in patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy and by obtaining cutoff points by software output factors; digital imaging can be used to differentiate between benign and malignant pancreatic tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10629281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106292812023-11-08 Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions Khozeymeh, Farzaneh Ariamanesh, Mona Roshan, Nema Mohamadian Jafarian, Amirhossein Farzanehfar, Mohammadreza Majd, Hassan Mehrad Sedghian, Alireza Dehghani, Mansoureh Cytojournal Research Article OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is one of the most important diagnostic tools for investigation of suspected pancreatic masses, although the interpretation of the results is controversial. In recent decades, digital image analysis (DIA) has been considered in pathology. The aim of this study was to assess the DIA in the evaluation of EUS-FNA based cytopathological specimens of pancreatic masses and comparing it with conventional cytology analysis by pathologist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was performed using cytological slides related to EUS-FNA samples of pancreatic lesions. The digital images were prepared and then analyzed by ImageJ software. Factors such as perimeter, circularity, area, minimum, maximum, mean, median of gray value, and integrated chromatin density of cell nucleus were extracted by software ImageJ and sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff point were evaluated in the diagnosis of malignant and benign lesions. RESULTS: In this retrospective study, 115 cytology samples were examined. Each specimen was reviewed by a pathologist and 150 images were prepared from the benign and malignant lesions and then analyzed by ImageJ software and a cut point was established by SPSS 26. The cutoff points for perimeter, integrated density, and the sum of three factors of perimeter, integrated density, and circularity to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions were reported to be 204.56, 131953, and 24643077, respectively. At this cutting point, the accuracy of estimation is based on the factors of perimeter, integrated density, and the sum of the three factors of perimeter, integrated density, and circularity were 92%, 92%, and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that digital analysis of images has a high accuracy in diagnosing malignant and benign lesions in the cytology of EUS-FNA in patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy and by obtaining cutoff points by software output factors; digital imaging can be used to differentiate between benign and malignant pancreatic tumors. Scientific Scholar 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10629281/ /pubmed/37942305 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_61_2022 Text en © 2023 Cytopathology Foundation Inc, Published by Scientific Scholar https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Khozeymeh, Farzaneh Ariamanesh, Mona Roshan, Nema Mohamadian Jafarian, Amirhossein Farzanehfar, Mohammadreza Majd, Hassan Mehrad Sedghian, Alireza Dehghani, Mansoureh Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions |
title | Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions |
title_full | Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions |
title_fullStr | Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions |
title_short | Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions |
title_sort | comparison of fna-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37942305 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_61_2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khozeymehfarzaneh comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions AT ariamaneshmona comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions AT roshannemamohamadian comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions AT jafarianamirhossein comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions AT farzanehfarmohammadreza comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions AT majdhassanmehrad comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions AT sedghianalireza comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions AT dehghanimansoureh comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions |