Cargando…

Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is one of the most important diagnostic tools for investigation of suspected pancreatic masses, although the interpretation of the results is controversial. In recent decades, digital image analysis (DIA) has been considered i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khozeymeh, Farzaneh, Ariamanesh, Mona, Roshan, Nema Mohamadian, Jafarian, Amirhossein, Farzanehfar, Mohammadreza, Majd, Hassan Mehrad, Sedghian, Alireza, Dehghani, Mansoureh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37942305
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_61_2022
_version_ 1785131934121197568
author Khozeymeh, Farzaneh
Ariamanesh, Mona
Roshan, Nema Mohamadian
Jafarian, Amirhossein
Farzanehfar, Mohammadreza
Majd, Hassan Mehrad
Sedghian, Alireza
Dehghani, Mansoureh
author_facet Khozeymeh, Farzaneh
Ariamanesh, Mona
Roshan, Nema Mohamadian
Jafarian, Amirhossein
Farzanehfar, Mohammadreza
Majd, Hassan Mehrad
Sedghian, Alireza
Dehghani, Mansoureh
author_sort Khozeymeh, Farzaneh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is one of the most important diagnostic tools for investigation of suspected pancreatic masses, although the interpretation of the results is controversial. In recent decades, digital image analysis (DIA) has been considered in pathology. The aim of this study was to assess the DIA in the evaluation of EUS-FNA based cytopathological specimens of pancreatic masses and comparing it with conventional cytology analysis by pathologist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was performed using cytological slides related to EUS-FNA samples of pancreatic lesions. The digital images were prepared and then analyzed by ImageJ software. Factors such as perimeter, circularity, area, minimum, maximum, mean, median of gray value, and integrated chromatin density of cell nucleus were extracted by software ImageJ and sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff point were evaluated in the diagnosis of malignant and benign lesions. RESULTS: In this retrospective study, 115 cytology samples were examined. Each specimen was reviewed by a pathologist and 150 images were prepared from the benign and malignant lesions and then analyzed by ImageJ software and a cut point was established by SPSS 26. The cutoff points for perimeter, integrated density, and the sum of three factors of perimeter, integrated density, and circularity to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions were reported to be 204.56, 131953, and 24643077, respectively. At this cutting point, the accuracy of estimation is based on the factors of perimeter, integrated density, and the sum of the three factors of perimeter, integrated density, and circularity were 92%, 92%, and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that digital analysis of images has a high accuracy in diagnosing malignant and benign lesions in the cytology of EUS-FNA in patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy and by obtaining cutoff points by software output factors; digital imaging can be used to differentiate between benign and malignant pancreatic tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10629281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106292812023-11-08 Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions Khozeymeh, Farzaneh Ariamanesh, Mona Roshan, Nema Mohamadian Jafarian, Amirhossein Farzanehfar, Mohammadreza Majd, Hassan Mehrad Sedghian, Alireza Dehghani, Mansoureh Cytojournal Research Article OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is one of the most important diagnostic tools for investigation of suspected pancreatic masses, although the interpretation of the results is controversial. In recent decades, digital image analysis (DIA) has been considered in pathology. The aim of this study was to assess the DIA in the evaluation of EUS-FNA based cytopathological specimens of pancreatic masses and comparing it with conventional cytology analysis by pathologist. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was performed using cytological slides related to EUS-FNA samples of pancreatic lesions. The digital images were prepared and then analyzed by ImageJ software. Factors such as perimeter, circularity, area, minimum, maximum, mean, median of gray value, and integrated chromatin density of cell nucleus were extracted by software ImageJ and sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff point were evaluated in the diagnosis of malignant and benign lesions. RESULTS: In this retrospective study, 115 cytology samples were examined. Each specimen was reviewed by a pathologist and 150 images were prepared from the benign and malignant lesions and then analyzed by ImageJ software and a cut point was established by SPSS 26. The cutoff points for perimeter, integrated density, and the sum of three factors of perimeter, integrated density, and circularity to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions were reported to be 204.56, 131953, and 24643077, respectively. At this cutting point, the accuracy of estimation is based on the factors of perimeter, integrated density, and the sum of the three factors of perimeter, integrated density, and circularity were 92%, 92%, and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that digital analysis of images has a high accuracy in diagnosing malignant and benign lesions in the cytology of EUS-FNA in patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy and by obtaining cutoff points by software output factors; digital imaging can be used to differentiate between benign and malignant pancreatic tumors. Scientific Scholar 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10629281/ /pubmed/37942305 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_61_2022 Text en © 2023 Cytopathology Foundation Inc, Published by Scientific Scholar https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khozeymeh, Farzaneh
Ariamanesh, Mona
Roshan, Nema Mohamadian
Jafarian, Amirhossein
Farzanehfar, Mohammadreza
Majd, Hassan Mehrad
Sedghian, Alireza
Dehghani, Mansoureh
Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions
title Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions
title_full Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions
title_fullStr Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions
title_short Comparison of FNA-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions
title_sort comparison of fna-based conventional cytology specimens and digital image analysis in assessment of pancreatic lesions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37942305
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_61_2022
work_keys_str_mv AT khozeymehfarzaneh comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions
AT ariamaneshmona comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions
AT roshannemamohamadian comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions
AT jafarianamirhossein comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions
AT farzanehfarmohammadreza comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions
AT majdhassanmehrad comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions
AT sedghianalireza comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions
AT dehghanimansoureh comparisonoffnabasedconventionalcytologyspecimensanddigitalimageanalysisinassessmentofpancreaticlesions