Cargando…

Observational study on the evolution of systemic treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Southwest Finland between 2010 and 2021

BACKGROUND: Novel receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced to the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) during the past decade. However, the adoption of novel treatments into clinical practice has been unknown in Finland. OBJECTIVES: Our a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hölsä, Olivia, Teittinen, Kaisa, Anttalainen, Anna, Ukkola-Vuoti, Liisa, Summanen, Milla, Mattila, Kalle E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231206243
_version_ 1785131939735273472
author Hölsä, Olivia
Teittinen, Kaisa
Anttalainen, Anna
Ukkola-Vuoti, Liisa
Summanen, Milla
Mattila, Kalle E
author_facet Hölsä, Olivia
Teittinen, Kaisa
Anttalainen, Anna
Ukkola-Vuoti, Liisa
Summanen, Milla
Mattila, Kalle E
author_sort Hölsä, Olivia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Novel receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced to the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) during the past decade. However, the adoption of novel treatments into clinical practice has been unknown in Finland. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the use of systemic treatments and treatment outcomes of aRCC patients in Southwest Finland during 2010–2021. DESIGN AND METHODS: Clinical characteristics, treatments for aRCC, healthcare resource utilization, and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively obtained from electronic medical records. Patients were stratified using the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk classification. RESULTS: In total, 1112 RCC patients were identified, 336 (30%) patients presented with aRCC, and 57% of them (n = 191) had received systemic treatment. Pre-2018, sunitinib (79%) was the most common first-line treatment, and pazopanib (17%), axitinib (17%), and cabozantinib (5%) were frequently used in the second-line. Post-2018, sunitinib (52%), cabozantinib (31%), and the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (10%) were most commonly used in the first-line, and cabozantinib (23%) in the second-line. Median OS for patients with favorable, intermediate, and poor risk were 61.9, 28.6, and 8.1 months, respectively. A total of 73%, 74%, and 35% of the patients with favorable, intermediate, and poor risk had received second-line systemic treatment. In poor-risk patients, the number of hospital inpatient days was twofold higher compared to intermediate and fourfold higher compared to favorable-risk patients. CONCLUSION: New treatment options were readily adopted into routine clinical practice after becoming reimbursed in Finland. OS and the need for hospitalization depended significantly on the IMDC risk category. Upfront combination treatments are warranted for poor-risk patients as the proportion of patients receiving second-line treatment is low. REGISTRATION: Clinical trial identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05363072.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10629305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106293052023-11-08 Observational study on the evolution of systemic treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Southwest Finland between 2010 and 2021 Hölsä, Olivia Teittinen, Kaisa Anttalainen, Anna Ukkola-Vuoti, Liisa Summanen, Milla Mattila, Kalle E Ther Adv Urol Future Perspectives in Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Promise of Advanced Therapeutics BACKGROUND: Novel receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced to the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) during the past decade. However, the adoption of novel treatments into clinical practice has been unknown in Finland. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the use of systemic treatments and treatment outcomes of aRCC patients in Southwest Finland during 2010–2021. DESIGN AND METHODS: Clinical characteristics, treatments for aRCC, healthcare resource utilization, and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively obtained from electronic medical records. Patients were stratified using the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk classification. RESULTS: In total, 1112 RCC patients were identified, 336 (30%) patients presented with aRCC, and 57% of them (n = 191) had received systemic treatment. Pre-2018, sunitinib (79%) was the most common first-line treatment, and pazopanib (17%), axitinib (17%), and cabozantinib (5%) were frequently used in the second-line. Post-2018, sunitinib (52%), cabozantinib (31%), and the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (10%) were most commonly used in the first-line, and cabozantinib (23%) in the second-line. Median OS for patients with favorable, intermediate, and poor risk were 61.9, 28.6, and 8.1 months, respectively. A total of 73%, 74%, and 35% of the patients with favorable, intermediate, and poor risk had received second-line systemic treatment. In poor-risk patients, the number of hospital inpatient days was twofold higher compared to intermediate and fourfold higher compared to favorable-risk patients. CONCLUSION: New treatment options were readily adopted into routine clinical practice after becoming reimbursed in Finland. OS and the need for hospitalization depended significantly on the IMDC risk category. Upfront combination treatments are warranted for poor-risk patients as the proportion of patients receiving second-line treatment is low. REGISTRATION: Clinical trial identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05363072. SAGE Publications 2023-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10629305/ /pubmed/37941979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231206243 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Future Perspectives in Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Promise of Advanced Therapeutics
Hölsä, Olivia
Teittinen, Kaisa
Anttalainen, Anna
Ukkola-Vuoti, Liisa
Summanen, Milla
Mattila, Kalle E
Observational study on the evolution of systemic treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Southwest Finland between 2010 and 2021
title Observational study on the evolution of systemic treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Southwest Finland between 2010 and 2021
title_full Observational study on the evolution of systemic treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Southwest Finland between 2010 and 2021
title_fullStr Observational study on the evolution of systemic treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Southwest Finland between 2010 and 2021
title_full_unstemmed Observational study on the evolution of systemic treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Southwest Finland between 2010 and 2021
title_short Observational study on the evolution of systemic treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Southwest Finland between 2010 and 2021
title_sort observational study on the evolution of systemic treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma in southwest finland between 2010 and 2021
topic Future Perspectives in Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Promise of Advanced Therapeutics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231206243
work_keys_str_mv AT holsaolivia observationalstudyontheevolutionofsystemictreatmentsforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomainsouthwestfinlandbetween2010and2021
AT teittinenkaisa observationalstudyontheevolutionofsystemictreatmentsforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomainsouthwestfinlandbetween2010and2021
AT anttalainenanna observationalstudyontheevolutionofsystemictreatmentsforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomainsouthwestfinlandbetween2010and2021
AT ukkolavuotiliisa observationalstudyontheevolutionofsystemictreatmentsforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomainsouthwestfinlandbetween2010and2021
AT summanenmilla observationalstudyontheevolutionofsystemictreatmentsforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomainsouthwestfinlandbetween2010and2021
AT mattilakallee observationalstudyontheevolutionofsystemictreatmentsforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomainsouthwestfinlandbetween2010and2021