Cargando…
Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks
In this study, we asked to what degree hemifields contribute to divided attention effects observed in tasks with object-based judgments. If object recognition processes in the two hemifields were fully independent, then placing stimuli in separate hemifields would eliminate divided attention effects...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37922155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.13.3 |
_version_ | 1785131979178508288 |
---|---|
author | Popovkina, Dina V. Palmer, John Moore, Cathleen M. Boynton, Geoffrey M. |
author_facet | Popovkina, Dina V. Palmer, John Moore, Cathleen M. Boynton, Geoffrey M. |
author_sort | Popovkina, Dina V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we asked to what degree hemifields contribute to divided attention effects observed in tasks with object-based judgments. If object recognition processes in the two hemifields were fully independent, then placing stimuli in separate hemifields would eliminate divided attention effects; in the alternative extreme, if object recognition processes in the two hemifields were fully integrated, then placing stimuli in separate hemifields would not modulate divided attention effects. Using a dual-task paradigm, we compared performance in a semantic categorization task for relevant stimuli arranged in the same hemifield to performance for relevant stimuli arranged in separate left and right hemifields. In two experiments, there was a reliable decrease in divided attention effects when stimuli were shown in separate hemifields compared to the same hemifield. However, the effect of divided attention was not eliminated. These results reject both the independent and integrated hypotheses, and instead support a third alternative – that object recognition processes in the two hemifields are partially dependent. More specifically, the magnitude of modulation by hemifields was closer to the prediction of the integrated hypothesis, suggesting that for dual tasks with objects, dependent processing is mostly shared across the visual field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10629520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106295202023-11-08 Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks Popovkina, Dina V. Palmer, John Moore, Cathleen M. Boynton, Geoffrey M. J Vis Article In this study, we asked to what degree hemifields contribute to divided attention effects observed in tasks with object-based judgments. If object recognition processes in the two hemifields were fully independent, then placing stimuli in separate hemifields would eliminate divided attention effects; in the alternative extreme, if object recognition processes in the two hemifields were fully integrated, then placing stimuli in separate hemifields would not modulate divided attention effects. Using a dual-task paradigm, we compared performance in a semantic categorization task for relevant stimuli arranged in the same hemifield to performance for relevant stimuli arranged in separate left and right hemifields. In two experiments, there was a reliable decrease in divided attention effects when stimuli were shown in separate hemifields compared to the same hemifield. However, the effect of divided attention was not eliminated. These results reject both the independent and integrated hypotheses, and instead support a third alternative – that object recognition processes in the two hemifields are partially dependent. More specifically, the magnitude of modulation by hemifields was closer to the prediction of the integrated hypothesis, suggesting that for dual tasks with objects, dependent processing is mostly shared across the visual field. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10629520/ /pubmed/37922155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.13.3 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Popovkina, Dina V. Palmer, John Moore, Cathleen M. Boynton, Geoffrey M. Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks |
title | Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks |
title_full | Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks |
title_fullStr | Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks |
title_short | Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks |
title_sort | testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37922155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.13.3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT popovkinadinav testinghemifieldindependencefordividedattentioninvisualobjecttasks AT palmerjohn testinghemifieldindependencefordividedattentioninvisualobjecttasks AT moorecathleenm testinghemifieldindependencefordividedattentioninvisualobjecttasks AT boyntongeoffreym testinghemifieldindependencefordividedattentioninvisualobjecttasks |