Cargando…

Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks

In this study, we asked to what degree hemifields contribute to divided attention effects observed in tasks with object-based judgments. If object recognition processes in the two hemifields were fully independent, then placing stimuli in separate hemifields would eliminate divided attention effects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Popovkina, Dina V., Palmer, John, Moore, Cathleen M., Boynton, Geoffrey M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37922155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.13.3
_version_ 1785131979178508288
author Popovkina, Dina V.
Palmer, John
Moore, Cathleen M.
Boynton, Geoffrey M.
author_facet Popovkina, Dina V.
Palmer, John
Moore, Cathleen M.
Boynton, Geoffrey M.
author_sort Popovkina, Dina V.
collection PubMed
description In this study, we asked to what degree hemifields contribute to divided attention effects observed in tasks with object-based judgments. If object recognition processes in the two hemifields were fully independent, then placing stimuli in separate hemifields would eliminate divided attention effects; in the alternative extreme, if object recognition processes in the two hemifields were fully integrated, then placing stimuli in separate hemifields would not modulate divided attention effects. Using a dual-task paradigm, we compared performance in a semantic categorization task for relevant stimuli arranged in the same hemifield to performance for relevant stimuli arranged in separate left and right hemifields. In two experiments, there was a reliable decrease in divided attention effects when stimuli were shown in separate hemifields compared to the same hemifield. However, the effect of divided attention was not eliminated. These results reject both the independent and integrated hypotheses, and instead support a third alternative – that object recognition processes in the two hemifields are partially dependent. More specifically, the magnitude of modulation by hemifields was closer to the prediction of the integrated hypothesis, suggesting that for dual tasks with objects, dependent processing is mostly shared across the visual field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10629520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106295202023-11-08 Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks Popovkina, Dina V. Palmer, John Moore, Cathleen M. Boynton, Geoffrey M. J Vis Article In this study, we asked to what degree hemifields contribute to divided attention effects observed in tasks with object-based judgments. If object recognition processes in the two hemifields were fully independent, then placing stimuli in separate hemifields would eliminate divided attention effects; in the alternative extreme, if object recognition processes in the two hemifields were fully integrated, then placing stimuli in separate hemifields would not modulate divided attention effects. Using a dual-task paradigm, we compared performance in a semantic categorization task for relevant stimuli arranged in the same hemifield to performance for relevant stimuli arranged in separate left and right hemifields. In two experiments, there was a reliable decrease in divided attention effects when stimuli were shown in separate hemifields compared to the same hemifield. However, the effect of divided attention was not eliminated. These results reject both the independent and integrated hypotheses, and instead support a third alternative – that object recognition processes in the two hemifields are partially dependent. More specifically, the magnitude of modulation by hemifields was closer to the prediction of the integrated hypothesis, suggesting that for dual tasks with objects, dependent processing is mostly shared across the visual field. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10629520/ /pubmed/37922155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.13.3 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Popovkina, Dina V.
Palmer, John
Moore, Cathleen M.
Boynton, Geoffrey M.
Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks
title Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks
title_full Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks
title_fullStr Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks
title_full_unstemmed Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks
title_short Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks
title_sort testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37922155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.13.3
work_keys_str_mv AT popovkinadinav testinghemifieldindependencefordividedattentioninvisualobjecttasks
AT palmerjohn testinghemifieldindependencefordividedattentioninvisualobjecttasks
AT moorecathleenm testinghemifieldindependencefordividedattentioninvisualobjecttasks
AT boyntongeoffreym testinghemifieldindependencefordividedattentioninvisualobjecttasks