Cargando…

Better safe than sorry?—On the influence of learned safety on pain perception

The experience of threat was found to result—mostly—in increased pain, however it is still unclear whether the exact opposite, namely the feeling of safety may lead to a reduction of pain. To test this hypothesis, we conducted two between-subject experiments (N = 94; N = 87), investigating whether l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zillig, Anna-Lena, Pauli, Paul, Wieser, Matthias, Reicherts, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37934741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289047
_version_ 1785131998244765696
author Zillig, Anna-Lena
Pauli, Paul
Wieser, Matthias
Reicherts, Philipp
author_facet Zillig, Anna-Lena
Pauli, Paul
Wieser, Matthias
Reicherts, Philipp
author_sort Zillig, Anna-Lena
collection PubMed
description The experience of threat was found to result—mostly—in increased pain, however it is still unclear whether the exact opposite, namely the feeling of safety may lead to a reduction of pain. To test this hypothesis, we conducted two between-subject experiments (N = 94; N = 87), investigating whether learned safety relative to a neutral control condition can reduce pain, while threat should lead to increased pain compared to a neutral condition. Therefore, participants first underwent either threat or safety conditioning, before entering an identical test phase, where the previously conditioned threat or safety cue and a newly introduced visual cue were presented simultaneously with heat pain stimuli. Methodological changes were performed in experiment 2 to prevent safety extinction and to facilitate conditioning in the first place: We included additional verbal instructions, increased the maximum length of the ISI and raised CS-US contingency in the threat group from 50% to 75%. In addition to pain ratings and ratings of the visual cues (threat, safety, arousal, valence, and contingency), in both experiments, we collected heart rate and skin conductance. Analysis of the cue ratings during acquisition indicate successful threat and safety induction, however results of the test phase, when also heat pain was administered, demonstrate rapid safety extinction in both experiments. Results suggest rather small modulation of subjective and physiological pain responses following threat or safety cues relative to the neutral condition. However, exploratory analysis revealed reduced pain ratings in later trials of the experiment in the safety group compared to the threat group in both studies, suggesting different temporal dynamics for threat and safety learning and extinction, respectively. Perspective: The present results demonstrate the challenge to maintain safety in the presence of acute pain and suggest more research on the interaction of affective learning mechanism and pain processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10629634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106296342023-11-08 Better safe than sorry?—On the influence of learned safety on pain perception Zillig, Anna-Lena Pauli, Paul Wieser, Matthias Reicherts, Philipp PLoS One Research Article The experience of threat was found to result—mostly—in increased pain, however it is still unclear whether the exact opposite, namely the feeling of safety may lead to a reduction of pain. To test this hypothesis, we conducted two between-subject experiments (N = 94; N = 87), investigating whether learned safety relative to a neutral control condition can reduce pain, while threat should lead to increased pain compared to a neutral condition. Therefore, participants first underwent either threat or safety conditioning, before entering an identical test phase, where the previously conditioned threat or safety cue and a newly introduced visual cue were presented simultaneously with heat pain stimuli. Methodological changes were performed in experiment 2 to prevent safety extinction and to facilitate conditioning in the first place: We included additional verbal instructions, increased the maximum length of the ISI and raised CS-US contingency in the threat group from 50% to 75%. In addition to pain ratings and ratings of the visual cues (threat, safety, arousal, valence, and contingency), in both experiments, we collected heart rate and skin conductance. Analysis of the cue ratings during acquisition indicate successful threat and safety induction, however results of the test phase, when also heat pain was administered, demonstrate rapid safety extinction in both experiments. Results suggest rather small modulation of subjective and physiological pain responses following threat or safety cues relative to the neutral condition. However, exploratory analysis revealed reduced pain ratings in later trials of the experiment in the safety group compared to the threat group in both studies, suggesting different temporal dynamics for threat and safety learning and extinction, respectively. Perspective: The present results demonstrate the challenge to maintain safety in the presence of acute pain and suggest more research on the interaction of affective learning mechanism and pain processing. Public Library of Science 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10629634/ /pubmed/37934741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289047 Text en © 2023 Zillig et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zillig, Anna-Lena
Pauli, Paul
Wieser, Matthias
Reicherts, Philipp
Better safe than sorry?—On the influence of learned safety on pain perception
title Better safe than sorry?—On the influence of learned safety on pain perception
title_full Better safe than sorry?—On the influence of learned safety on pain perception
title_fullStr Better safe than sorry?—On the influence of learned safety on pain perception
title_full_unstemmed Better safe than sorry?—On the influence of learned safety on pain perception
title_short Better safe than sorry?—On the influence of learned safety on pain perception
title_sort better safe than sorry?—on the influence of learned safety on pain perception
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37934741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289047
work_keys_str_mv AT zilligannalena bettersafethansorryontheinfluenceoflearnedsafetyonpainperception
AT paulipaul bettersafethansorryontheinfluenceoflearnedsafetyonpainperception
AT wiesermatthias bettersafethansorryontheinfluenceoflearnedsafetyonpainperception
AT reichertsphilipp bettersafethansorryontheinfluenceoflearnedsafetyonpainperception