Cargando…
Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review
Amputation is an irreversible, last-line treatment indicated for a multitude of medical problems. Delaying amputation in favor of limb-sparing treatment may lead to increased risk of morbidity and mortality. This systematic review aims to synthesize the literature on how ML is being applied to predi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37934767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293684 |
_version_ | 1785131998711382016 |
---|---|
author | Yao, Patrick Fangping Diao, Yi David McMullen, Eric P. Manka, Marlin Murphy, Jessica Lin, Celina |
author_facet | Yao, Patrick Fangping Diao, Yi David McMullen, Eric P. Manka, Marlin Murphy, Jessica Lin, Celina |
author_sort | Yao, Patrick Fangping |
collection | PubMed |
description | Amputation is an irreversible, last-line treatment indicated for a multitude of medical problems. Delaying amputation in favor of limb-sparing treatment may lead to increased risk of morbidity and mortality. This systematic review aims to synthesize the literature on how ML is being applied to predict amputation as an outcome. OVID Embase, OVID Medline, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore were searched from inception to March 5, 2023. 1376 studies were screened; 15 articles were included. In the diabetic population, models ranged from sub-optimal to excellent performance (AUC: 0.6–0.94). In trauma patients, models had strong to excellent performance (AUC: 0.88–0.95). In patients who received amputation secondary to other etiologies (e.g.: burns and peripheral vascular disease), models had similar performance (AUC: 0.81–1.0). Many studies were found to have a high PROBAST risk of bias, most often due to small sample sizes. In conclusion, multiple machine learning models have been successfully developed that have the potential to be superior to traditional modeling techniques and prospective clinical judgment in predicting amputation. Further research is needed to overcome the limitations of current studies and to bring applicability to a clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10629636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106296362023-11-08 Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review Yao, Patrick Fangping Diao, Yi David McMullen, Eric P. Manka, Marlin Murphy, Jessica Lin, Celina PLoS One Research Article Amputation is an irreversible, last-line treatment indicated for a multitude of medical problems. Delaying amputation in favor of limb-sparing treatment may lead to increased risk of morbidity and mortality. This systematic review aims to synthesize the literature on how ML is being applied to predict amputation as an outcome. OVID Embase, OVID Medline, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore were searched from inception to March 5, 2023. 1376 studies were screened; 15 articles were included. In the diabetic population, models ranged from sub-optimal to excellent performance (AUC: 0.6–0.94). In trauma patients, models had strong to excellent performance (AUC: 0.88–0.95). In patients who received amputation secondary to other etiologies (e.g.: burns and peripheral vascular disease), models had similar performance (AUC: 0.81–1.0). Many studies were found to have a high PROBAST risk of bias, most often due to small sample sizes. In conclusion, multiple machine learning models have been successfully developed that have the potential to be superior to traditional modeling techniques and prospective clinical judgment in predicting amputation. Further research is needed to overcome the limitations of current studies and to bring applicability to a clinical setting. Public Library of Science 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10629636/ /pubmed/37934767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293684 Text en © 2023 Yao et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yao, Patrick Fangping Diao, Yi David McMullen, Eric P. Manka, Marlin Murphy, Jessica Lin, Celina Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review |
title | Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review |
title_full | Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review |
title_short | Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review |
title_sort | predicting amputation using machine learning: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37934767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yaopatrickfangping predictingamputationusingmachinelearningasystematicreview AT diaoyidavid predictingamputationusingmachinelearningasystematicreview AT mcmullenericp predictingamputationusingmachinelearningasystematicreview AT mankamarlin predictingamputationusingmachinelearningasystematicreview AT murphyjessica predictingamputationusingmachinelearningasystematicreview AT lincelina predictingamputationusingmachinelearningasystematicreview |