Cargando…

Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review

Amputation is an irreversible, last-line treatment indicated for a multitude of medical problems. Delaying amputation in favor of limb-sparing treatment may lead to increased risk of morbidity and mortality. This systematic review aims to synthesize the literature on how ML is being applied to predi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao, Patrick Fangping, Diao, Yi David, McMullen, Eric P., Manka, Marlin, Murphy, Jessica, Lin, Celina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37934767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293684
_version_ 1785131998711382016
author Yao, Patrick Fangping
Diao, Yi David
McMullen, Eric P.
Manka, Marlin
Murphy, Jessica
Lin, Celina
author_facet Yao, Patrick Fangping
Diao, Yi David
McMullen, Eric P.
Manka, Marlin
Murphy, Jessica
Lin, Celina
author_sort Yao, Patrick Fangping
collection PubMed
description Amputation is an irreversible, last-line treatment indicated for a multitude of medical problems. Delaying amputation in favor of limb-sparing treatment may lead to increased risk of morbidity and mortality. This systematic review aims to synthesize the literature on how ML is being applied to predict amputation as an outcome. OVID Embase, OVID Medline, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore were searched from inception to March 5, 2023. 1376 studies were screened; 15 articles were included. In the diabetic population, models ranged from sub-optimal to excellent performance (AUC: 0.6–0.94). In trauma patients, models had strong to excellent performance (AUC: 0.88–0.95). In patients who received amputation secondary to other etiologies (e.g.: burns and peripheral vascular disease), models had similar performance (AUC: 0.81–1.0). Many studies were found to have a high PROBAST risk of bias, most often due to small sample sizes. In conclusion, multiple machine learning models have been successfully developed that have the potential to be superior to traditional modeling techniques and prospective clinical judgment in predicting amputation. Further research is needed to overcome the limitations of current studies and to bring applicability to a clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10629636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106296362023-11-08 Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review Yao, Patrick Fangping Diao, Yi David McMullen, Eric P. Manka, Marlin Murphy, Jessica Lin, Celina PLoS One Research Article Amputation is an irreversible, last-line treatment indicated for a multitude of medical problems. Delaying amputation in favor of limb-sparing treatment may lead to increased risk of morbidity and mortality. This systematic review aims to synthesize the literature on how ML is being applied to predict amputation as an outcome. OVID Embase, OVID Medline, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore were searched from inception to March 5, 2023. 1376 studies were screened; 15 articles were included. In the diabetic population, models ranged from sub-optimal to excellent performance (AUC: 0.6–0.94). In trauma patients, models had strong to excellent performance (AUC: 0.88–0.95). In patients who received amputation secondary to other etiologies (e.g.: burns and peripheral vascular disease), models had similar performance (AUC: 0.81–1.0). Many studies were found to have a high PROBAST risk of bias, most often due to small sample sizes. In conclusion, multiple machine learning models have been successfully developed that have the potential to be superior to traditional modeling techniques and prospective clinical judgment in predicting amputation. Further research is needed to overcome the limitations of current studies and to bring applicability to a clinical setting. Public Library of Science 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10629636/ /pubmed/37934767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293684 Text en © 2023 Yao et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yao, Patrick Fangping
Diao, Yi David
McMullen, Eric P.
Manka, Marlin
Murphy, Jessica
Lin, Celina
Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review
title Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review
title_full Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review
title_fullStr Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review
title_short Predicting amputation using machine learning: A systematic review
title_sort predicting amputation using machine learning: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37934767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293684
work_keys_str_mv AT yaopatrickfangping predictingamputationusingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT diaoyidavid predictingamputationusingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT mcmullenericp predictingamputationusingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT mankamarlin predictingamputationusingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT murphyjessica predictingamputationusingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT lincelina predictingamputationusingmachinelearningasystematicreview