Cargando…

Phytochemical and biological investigations on Centranthus kellereri (Stoj., Stef. & T. Georgiev) Stoj. & Stef. and C. ruber (L.) DC. and their potential as new medicinal and ornamental plants

INTRODUCTION: Centranthus kellereri is a Bulgarian endemic plant species, found only in two locations in the world: The Balkans Mountains (Stara Planina), above the town of Vratsa, and The Pirin Mountains, above the town of Bansko, Bulgaria. Being endemic and endangered species precluded any signifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheljazkov, Valtcho D., Semerdjieva, Ivanka B., Borisova, Daniela, Yankova-Tsvetkova, Elina, Koleva-Valkova, Lyubka H., Petrova, Galya, Dincheva, Ivayla, Stevens, Fred, Wu, Wenbin, Astatkie, Tess, Ivanova, Tanya, Stoyanova, Albena, Dzhurmanski, Anatoli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37934763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293877
_version_ 1785132004347478016
author Zheljazkov, Valtcho D.
Semerdjieva, Ivanka B.
Borisova, Daniela
Yankova-Tsvetkova, Elina
Koleva-Valkova, Lyubka H.
Petrova, Galya
Dincheva, Ivayla
Stevens, Fred
Wu, Wenbin
Astatkie, Tess
Ivanova, Tanya
Stoyanova, Albena
Dzhurmanski, Anatoli
author_facet Zheljazkov, Valtcho D.
Semerdjieva, Ivanka B.
Borisova, Daniela
Yankova-Tsvetkova, Elina
Koleva-Valkova, Lyubka H.
Petrova, Galya
Dincheva, Ivayla
Stevens, Fred
Wu, Wenbin
Astatkie, Tess
Ivanova, Tanya
Stoyanova, Albena
Dzhurmanski, Anatoli
author_sort Zheljazkov, Valtcho D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Centranthus kellereri is a Bulgarian endemic plant species, found only in two locations in the world: The Balkans Mountains (Stara Planina), above the town of Vratsa, and The Pirin Mountains, above the town of Bansko, Bulgaria. Being endemic and endangered species precluded any significant research on it. The hypothesis of this study was that the populations of C. kellereri may represent genetically, phytochemically, and morphologically distinct forms and these will differentiate from C. ruber. Furthermore, C. kellereri possibly imperfect embryology may preclude its more widespread distribution under natural conditions. RESULTS: This study revealed the phytochemical profile, antioxidant activity, embryology, surface microstructural morphological traits, and genetic differences between the C. kellereri plants from the only two natural populations and compares them to the ones of the related and better-known plant C. ruber. The essential oil (EO) content in aboveground plant parts and in roots was generally low and the EO composition varied significantly as a function of plant part, year of sampling, location, and species. Methylvaleric acid was a major EO constituent in the C. kellereri EO, ranging between 60.2% and 71.7% of the total EO. The EO included monoterpenes, sequiterpenes, long-chain alkanes and fatty acids. Phytochemical analyses of plant tissue revealed the occurrence of 32 compounds that were tentatively identified as 6 simple phenolics, 18 flavonoids, 1 quinone, 1 lipid, 1 alkaloid, 2 diterpenes, and 3 triterpenes. There were differences in detected compounds between the C. kellereri plants at the two locations and between the roots and shoots in both species. The total phenols and flavonoids varied between the two species but were also dissimilar between the plants from the two populations of C. kelleri. Free radical scavenging activity, measured with ABTS and DPPH in aqueous and methanol extracts, had similar values; however, overall, C. kellereri from Vratsa showed the highest antioxidant activity while C. ruber had the lowest activity. Genetic analyses showed a clear differentiation between C. kellereri and C. ruber, and between the two populations of C. kellereri. Embryological studies revealed the peculiarities of the male and female generative spheres of the two species that were defined as being sexually reproducing. The pollen had high viability; however, the low viability of seeds demonstrated possible high sensitivity of C. kellereri to the environmental conditions, perhaps the main factor modifying and restricting the population sizes. The SEM analyses exposed differences in surface microstructural traits between the species (C. kellereri and C. ruber) but also between the two populations of C. kellereri. The observed dissimilarities in genetic makeup, micromorphological characteristics, and phytochemical composition strongly indicate that the two populations can be classified as distinct subspecies or varieties of C. kellereri; var. pirinensis and var. balkanensis. Further research is needed to introduce C. kellereri into culture and develop it as a high-value specialty crop or ornamental in order to conserve C. kellereri natural populations. C. kellereri may be utilized as a source for phytochemicals of interest and as an ornamental plant like C. ruber; however, it may have a greater environmental plasticity and adaptation as evidenced by its current locations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10629660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106296602023-11-08 Phytochemical and biological investigations on Centranthus kellereri (Stoj., Stef. & T. Georgiev) Stoj. & Stef. and C. ruber (L.) DC. and their potential as new medicinal and ornamental plants Zheljazkov, Valtcho D. Semerdjieva, Ivanka B. Borisova, Daniela Yankova-Tsvetkova, Elina Koleva-Valkova, Lyubka H. Petrova, Galya Dincheva, Ivayla Stevens, Fred Wu, Wenbin Astatkie, Tess Ivanova, Tanya Stoyanova, Albena Dzhurmanski, Anatoli PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Centranthus kellereri is a Bulgarian endemic plant species, found only in two locations in the world: The Balkans Mountains (Stara Planina), above the town of Vratsa, and The Pirin Mountains, above the town of Bansko, Bulgaria. Being endemic and endangered species precluded any significant research on it. The hypothesis of this study was that the populations of C. kellereri may represent genetically, phytochemically, and morphologically distinct forms and these will differentiate from C. ruber. Furthermore, C. kellereri possibly imperfect embryology may preclude its more widespread distribution under natural conditions. RESULTS: This study revealed the phytochemical profile, antioxidant activity, embryology, surface microstructural morphological traits, and genetic differences between the C. kellereri plants from the only two natural populations and compares them to the ones of the related and better-known plant C. ruber. The essential oil (EO) content in aboveground plant parts and in roots was generally low and the EO composition varied significantly as a function of plant part, year of sampling, location, and species. Methylvaleric acid was a major EO constituent in the C. kellereri EO, ranging between 60.2% and 71.7% of the total EO. The EO included monoterpenes, sequiterpenes, long-chain alkanes and fatty acids. Phytochemical analyses of plant tissue revealed the occurrence of 32 compounds that were tentatively identified as 6 simple phenolics, 18 flavonoids, 1 quinone, 1 lipid, 1 alkaloid, 2 diterpenes, and 3 triterpenes. There were differences in detected compounds between the C. kellereri plants at the two locations and between the roots and shoots in both species. The total phenols and flavonoids varied between the two species but were also dissimilar between the plants from the two populations of C. kelleri. Free radical scavenging activity, measured with ABTS and DPPH in aqueous and methanol extracts, had similar values; however, overall, C. kellereri from Vratsa showed the highest antioxidant activity while C. ruber had the lowest activity. Genetic analyses showed a clear differentiation between C. kellereri and C. ruber, and between the two populations of C. kellereri. Embryological studies revealed the peculiarities of the male and female generative spheres of the two species that were defined as being sexually reproducing. The pollen had high viability; however, the low viability of seeds demonstrated possible high sensitivity of C. kellereri to the environmental conditions, perhaps the main factor modifying and restricting the population sizes. The SEM analyses exposed differences in surface microstructural traits between the species (C. kellereri and C. ruber) but also between the two populations of C. kellereri. The observed dissimilarities in genetic makeup, micromorphological characteristics, and phytochemical composition strongly indicate that the two populations can be classified as distinct subspecies or varieties of C. kellereri; var. pirinensis and var. balkanensis. Further research is needed to introduce C. kellereri into culture and develop it as a high-value specialty crop or ornamental in order to conserve C. kellereri natural populations. C. kellereri may be utilized as a source for phytochemicals of interest and as an ornamental plant like C. ruber; however, it may have a greater environmental plasticity and adaptation as evidenced by its current locations. Public Library of Science 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10629660/ /pubmed/37934763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293877 Text en © 2023 Zheljazkov et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zheljazkov, Valtcho D.
Semerdjieva, Ivanka B.
Borisova, Daniela
Yankova-Tsvetkova, Elina
Koleva-Valkova, Lyubka H.
Petrova, Galya
Dincheva, Ivayla
Stevens, Fred
Wu, Wenbin
Astatkie, Tess
Ivanova, Tanya
Stoyanova, Albena
Dzhurmanski, Anatoli
Phytochemical and biological investigations on Centranthus kellereri (Stoj., Stef. & T. Georgiev) Stoj. & Stef. and C. ruber (L.) DC. and their potential as new medicinal and ornamental plants
title Phytochemical and biological investigations on Centranthus kellereri (Stoj., Stef. & T. Georgiev) Stoj. & Stef. and C. ruber (L.) DC. and their potential as new medicinal and ornamental plants
title_full Phytochemical and biological investigations on Centranthus kellereri (Stoj., Stef. & T. Georgiev) Stoj. & Stef. and C. ruber (L.) DC. and their potential as new medicinal and ornamental plants
title_fullStr Phytochemical and biological investigations on Centranthus kellereri (Stoj., Stef. & T. Georgiev) Stoj. & Stef. and C. ruber (L.) DC. and their potential as new medicinal and ornamental plants
title_full_unstemmed Phytochemical and biological investigations on Centranthus kellereri (Stoj., Stef. & T. Georgiev) Stoj. & Stef. and C. ruber (L.) DC. and their potential as new medicinal and ornamental plants
title_short Phytochemical and biological investigations on Centranthus kellereri (Stoj., Stef. & T. Georgiev) Stoj. & Stef. and C. ruber (L.) DC. and their potential as new medicinal and ornamental plants
title_sort phytochemical and biological investigations on centranthus kellereri (stoj., stef. & t. georgiev) stoj. & stef. and c. ruber (l.) dc. and their potential as new medicinal and ornamental plants
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37934763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293877
work_keys_str_mv AT zheljazkovvaltchod phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants
AT semerdjievaivankab phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants
AT borisovadaniela phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants
AT yankovatsvetkovaelina phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants
AT kolevavalkovalyubkah phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants
AT petrovagalya phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants
AT dinchevaivayla phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants
AT stevensfred phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants
AT wuwenbin phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants
AT astatkietess phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants
AT ivanovatanya phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants
AT stoyanovaalbena phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants
AT dzhurmanskianatoli phytochemicalandbiologicalinvestigationsoncentranthuskellereristojsteftgeorgievstojstefandcruberldcandtheirpotentialasnewmedicinalandornamentalplants